Ralph Anderson Audit Summary

268 Words1 Page

Chief Fortier’s execution of management created disharmony within the department from the onset of his administration. Understanding that the department was loosely managed with “a hands-off approach, preferring to leave matters to the officers and detectives themselves with an appeal to their sense of professional integrity” (Cordner, 2014), the forced implementation of recommendations identified in the Ralph Anderson Audit while initiating change for the better of the department, created an us v. you mentality, where adherence to the changes were made at the onset to gain position only to block and stonewall any further changes. In spite of the gains the officers received as a result of the Ralph Anderson Audit, gains such as updated equipment

Open Document