Corporal punishment is a discipline method in which an administering adult inflicts pain upon a student (usually using a paddle) in response to a student's offensive behavior. Nowadays regulations have been created as to how many “swats” can be inflicted, by whom, and with what instrument. It is still used in many U.S. schools as a disciplinary method against disobedient or defiant students. Although corporal punishment is no longer tolerated in the military, prisons, or mental institutions, 21 states still allow corporal punishment in full or in part according to the U.S. Department of Education. Every year, more than 223,190 students are being subjected to this particular form of punishment in public schools, and a disproportionate number are minority students, male students, and students with disabilities. Research has also shown a correlation between the use of corporal punishment and increased school truancy, dropout rates, violence, and vandalism schools. Principal Sid Leonard, from Toledo Ohio states, expresses his feelings against corporal punishment: "The same ones kept coming back for more. It wasn't working. Hitting children did not seem to improve their behavior. It seemed in fact to be reinforcing the very behaviors I was attempting to eliminate." Advocates of corporal punishment view it as a fast and effective procedure as opposed to a time consuming suspension. Father Philip Berrigan, a teacher at St. Augustine High school in New Orleans, expresses how beneficial corporal punishment served him as a teacher: "Sometimes we sent a student to the principal's office for a paddling, and I have seen a marvelous clearing of the air with a simple whack on the butt. The offending student realized without resorting to guilt ...
According to Parenting Without Punishment: A Humanist Perspective part one written by Leaon F Seltzer discusses the scientific evidence against disciplining a child physically is indisputable. In others words, corporal punishment in a child development can affect the child’s growth. Not only is beating a helpless, dependent child morally questionable, it is also repeatedly been shown to be counter-productive. However, corporal punishment leads the child to do the wrong things because its showing harmful to the child’s sense of self and can damage its inflicts on the child. In addition to that, resent surveys were given to many parents about corporal punishment and two thirds of the parents responded saying, they approve on those actions. Also,
The Effects of Corporal Punishment on Children
Corporal punishment is the physical disciplinary method used by parents, teachers, and school administrators in an effort to correct a child’s undesirable behaviors. The use of physical force is one that is often times controversial and usually evokes very strong reactions. These feelings surface, and opposing views clash, when scandals surrounding corporal punishment hit the media and heated arguments in the comments section of articles emerge. While corporal punishment occasionally makes its way into the limelight, it is a decision all parents are faced with eventually and often times daily. For example, when a toddler is sprawled out on the grocery store floor kicking, hitting, and flinging
Corporal punishment is defined as “an infliction of punishment to the body.” My primary reason for not approving corporal punishment would be that corporal punishment creates a negative reaction from the student’s perspective plus additional problems in the end. To discipline students in a way that will harm them into non-misbehavior is not the way to go. I claim that corporal punishment in public schools should not be permitted because it is barbaric, harmful, and in no way a method to solve personal problems.
There have been enormous changes in the attitudes of most parents over the last few years. A large number of parents would agree with using force and physical punishments regularly as a way of dealing with discipline problems in their kids. Some of the parents do not have the knowledge of the tremendous amount of negative effects they can leave on children by using corporal punishments; therefore, they use the wrong way to punish their kids. Studies show that about 50% of families use physical punishment to discipline children (Gershoff, 2008). Many may claim that punishing children is a good way to stop them from committing errors, as children can remember the pain they got in the previous time they did a mistake. However, it is argued that the child should not be hurt physically whatever was the reason because of the physical damage and the emotional problems that might happen to a child.
It gives a synopsis of the history, legality, and practice of corporal punishment in U.S. public schools. It presents approaches that address the challenge of reducing the frequency of corporal punishment, which include utilizing alternative forms of discipline. Importantly, this source addresses the influence of religious and cultural beliefs on opinions about corporal punishment.
Corporal punishment should be used as a last resort when a child breaks the rules, but it should be used when the child maintains the behavior they had been talked to about. So, that the teacher can enforce rules to be followed and show that disruptive behavior will not be allowed in the classroom. If the child than after multiple attempts to fix the problem, still continues with such behavior they should be allowed to use corporal punishment. In a study conducted by “Gordon Central High School found that when teachers used corporal punishment instead of the standard in school detention, or suspensions that students were more willing to take a few paddles on the buttocks than the standard punishment. The school found that when students took the corporal punishment that they were more willing to think before they acted the next time” (Lee and McMahon 3). Therefore, using corporal punishment in school would have a positive behavioral effect later in
Corporal Punishment
Introduction
On a student’s cell phone, a teacher is caught hitting students with a thick stick. He continually hits everywhere from the students’ hips to the head harshly without a hesitation. This video is opened to the public by a student in the class posting it on the Internet. According to the other students, they were punished because they skipped class when the school inspectors came. All the people who looked at it on the Internet were surprised to see this kind of behavior.
Canes. Paddles. Belts. A hand. All of these can be used as weapons. Not weapons of war, however. These are examples of weaponry used against our youth in 19 states. Corporal punishment, or punishment administered by an adult (as a parent or a teacher) to the body of a child ranging in severity from a slap to a spanking. Currently 119 countries have banned corporal punishment in schools, including every European country with addition to Canada. Even with the example being set by countries the United States is closely related to, the movement for a complete ban barely half-way complete. Over time, research has suggested effects from this form of discipline will leave harming, lasting effects upon the student. This combined with the unconstitutional nature of corporal punishment administered to students are why we should finally ban it across the country.
...nishment has been ban since 1999. A lot of countries unlike the United States use corporal punishment, as there main punishment like if you act out of order there is a punishment that goes along with it (Seifred 2010).