Power Of Ridicule: An Analysis Of Satire

1246 Words3 Pages

As more works enter the world of literature every year, authors must find ways to uniquely connect with their audience, and set themselves and their piece apart from other stories. Oscar Wilde uses satire throughout his story The Importance of Being Earnest to provide social commentary and lighten the mood in this comedy. The main characters appear foolish and pompous throughout, indicating his perspective on their time period, and how he believes those characters would interact with each other. Emphasized in the article “The Power of Ridicule: An Analysis of Satire” by Megan Leboeuf, the use of satire not only adds depth to a story, but also offers the author a protected voice and a chance to critique the time period they live in as a whole. …show more content…

Megan LaBeouf's article “The Power of Ridicule: An Analysis of Satire” claims that, “Messages that would be ignored or punished if overtly declared are reaching millions of people in satirical form, and making a real difference” (LeBeouf). This idea that a bold and explicit statement made by a writer or speaker could quickly be dismissed as radical or audacious and not analyzed makes satire a way into the reader’s mind. For example, as Wilde commentates on the social hypocrisy and division of class across the Victorian time period, he employs the character of Lady Bracknell to depict the issues with the class system. As the characters begin to become engaged, she immediately judges Cecily based on the fact that Jack is her guardian. However, her views instantly change when Jack tells her that Cecily has a hundred and thirty thousand pounds in funds, as she retracts and states "A hundred and thirty thousand pounds! Miss Cardew seems to me a most attractive young lady, now that I look at her" (Wilde 1474). Emphasis is placed on a person's wealth rather than their personality, sincerity, or compassion for the other. Marriage is viewed as an economic factor, whereby people marry for wealth or to conserve wealth in their families, especially Lady Bracknell who represents the guardian of an upper class society. She is however a hypocrite and uses social morals to her …show more content…

Wilde’s characters engage in foolishness throughout the story, and perform some actions that make the play more enjoyable for his audience. For instance, Algernon scolds Jack ridiculously as he is dressed for mourning of Jack’s fake brother. Algernon claims, “Well, I don't like your clothes. You look perfectly ridiculous in them. Why on earth don't you go up and change? It is perfectly childish to be in deep mourning for a man who is actually staying for a whole week with you in your house as a guest. I call it grotesque” (Wilde 1460). Algernon is the character who foils Jack’s plan, so his ridiculous attack upon Jack’s wardrobe seems both shallow but silly. Even down to the word choices and logic Algernon uses, such as “childish,” and “grotesque” add to the absurdity of this statement, and help the reader not only get a glimpse into the characters true selves, but also enjoy the drama between them as comedy. This is furthermore seen as the two courting gentlemen eat muffins after they have just been exposed as liars to their suitors. During this time of distress, they end up in a trivial argument as Jack accuses Algernon of being heartless for gladly eating during this time, when Algernon responds back “Well, I can't eat muffins in an agitated manner” (Wilde 1469). This laughable response offers slapstick humor to the audience, while continuing to provide satirical elements of the

Open Document