Variation in the Use of Force Amongst Police Departments
The use of force has been around since policing began, although the rules for its use have changed overtime. In a 1964 survey, the majority of police reported they were to use “good judgement” when deciding whether or not to shoot (Walker 1993, 26). Back then, police also used force for any fleeing felon, which basically meant whenever. Now that rules have changed, the American Law Institute’s Model Penal Code, established in 1962, states that police are to only use force when they feel their life or someone else’s life is in danger (Walker 1993, 27).
In any given setting, police officers are responsible for maintaining order within a, sometimes overly chaotic, society. They are given the responsibility of acting as protectors of the defenseless and upholding justice, at the risk of injury to themselves or even the loss of their own life. In addition, it is inevitable that an officer will eventually come into physical contact with an individual, who may be volatile or avoiding arrest, which nonetheless increases the odds of a physical confrontation. The distressing truth is that, although being assaulted is not a requirement of their profession, it is essentially unavoidable. With that said, police officers realize this fact and readily accept the reality that at any given moment, be
In August 2014, four deaths made big headlines nationwide. Michael Brown, Eric Garner, Ezell Ford, and John Crawford III all tragically died at the hands of the police as a result of the use of deadly force. Perhaps more tragic is the fact that all four men were African American and therefore have drawn attention as examples of racial bias held by the law enforcement community. However, their cases have led to much speculation regarding whether or not police use of deadly force is legal, or even ethical. Based on current United States constitutional law and case law, deadly force is allowed, but is regulated to an extent based upon the circumstances which surround its use. Many people believe that regulations regarding the use of deadly
The second article, Police Use of Deadly force, goes into depth about the leading causes of deadly force used by the police and the steps that are taken by the organization involved after an incident occurs. The article also states the policy that all officers are informed about and expected to follow. That policy is the way that the government and bigger organizations try to control the officer’s behavior by grants of legitimacy. These grants of legitimacy confer the appropriate and legitimate authority upon positions and situations officers get themselves into and that organization will assure them that they are protected from being sanctioned or charged for misconduct if they act accordingly. BUT when that organization withdrawals legitimacy
The use of deadly force by the police is a very controversial and popular topic, as of recent (the last few years or so). Officers who find themselves in a situation where deadly force is needed are put under intense scrutiny of the media and the public. What the news and other media tend to leave out about incidents of deadly force is that nearly impossible decision that officer had to make in only a few short moments. This brigs forth the question "when should the police use deadly force and when should they not?" according to the Model Penal Code, section 307(2)(B), where the rules of law enforcement officers' use of deadly force was adopted, states that the use of deadly force is justifiable only under the following
Purpose: This policy was created to educate police officers on the use and restrictions of force when placed in difficult situations. This policy will also explain how to distinguish lethal from non lethal tactics and weaponry. We want for them to exercise good judgment and caution when apprehending suspects; not only for their own safety, but the safety of others.
The misuse of force by American police officers, is an ‘optimizing force’ that poses a threat to not only civilians and their families but police departments in regards to costs, whether it be monetary or the lives lost by the hands of officers or the officers themselves. The issue of force is heavily present in newspapers, social media, videos depicting excessive force and brutality between police officers and citizens, instigating racial and ethnic tensions in many communities across America. The problem whether police men and women use excessive force lies not only in the actions of the officers but reflects the department’s management and leadership signifying that the department has a greater role in reducing force than individual officers.
Recently in the United States there has been in increase in deaths that have come from police officers using deadly force. The use of force is inevitable as a police officer, many times their own lives or the life’s civilians are at risk when it comes to determine what type of force a officer should use. There are many incidents where police officer have to react in a matter of seconds and has to choose between his own life or that of the individual causing the disturbance. When a Police Officer uses deadly force has caused outraged with the public, stirring up protests and creating a scandal for the police officer and the Police Department. Many do not know when it is right for an officer to use deadly force and what constitutes it, or what happens when the officer does not use the appropriate amount of force that is required to control the situation. There has been many changes in Police Departments around the country to try to reduce the use of deadly force in response to the issues that have occurred because of it.
Every day police must make important decision within society. Decision making encompasses whether to enforce the law or not to enforce the law in certain circumstances. One can observe discretion is situations pertaining to traffic violation or those as a result of a minor or private offence. One may have experienced this when an officer decided to provide a warning instead of issuing a speeding ticket. In certain circumstances, officers consider many variables when exercising their discretionary decision. Such decision may include but are not limited to offender’s demeanor, age, economic status, race, gender, or maybe even an offender’s health. Situational variables can also influence an officer’s decision on the basis of the seriousness of the crime,
The use of deadly force involving police officers has a lot of attention this past year. In today’s news and social media, there have been more reports and videos of police officers using deadly force on their suspects and how the victims of the police where not a threat. There have been people that were killed and that they had no weapons on them, were mentally challenged, or were just running away and most of the time the police officer will say that it was a necessary use of deadly force. According to sites, like theguardian.com “South Carolina Shooting Raises about how the U.S. has more deaths by cops than any other countries, which is a serious problem, and while on CNN, they found out by Friedman, a civil rights attorney and law professor, that in a case of Walter Scott, who was unarmed and running away, that “the use of deadly force is permitted but conditional”. Therefore, this means