Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of realism in literature
Importance of realism in literature
The impact of realism in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of realism in literature
In my essay, I will be comparing and contrasting the Disney Pocahontas movie to the Pocahontas documentary. The topics that I will cover will be the setting, characters, and events. Both movies explain about the story of Pocahontas’s life, although there are some differences between the two movies. I will discuss how the characters are different in the two movies. In the Pocahontas documentary, the characters are realistic Powhatan, John Smith, and of course Pocahontas. Another real character that is not mentioned in the documentary is Kocoum. In the Disney movie of Pocahontas, the characters are animated John Smith, Pocahontas, Governor Ratcliffe, and Powhatan. Also in the Disney movie, Pocahontas has a friend named Nakoma. A few standby characters are Thomas, John’s friend, Wiggins, Kekata, Ben, and Lon. Some examples that prove the Disney Pocahontas is make-believe are Pocahontas’s animal friend’s, Meeko and Flit, & Pocahontas grandmother that shows up as a willow tree. However, both movies do have Pocahontas, John Smith, and Powhatan as main characters. …show more content…
In the documentary, the setting takes place in historical sites such as; the old Jamestown, Powhatan's tribe’s location, and Virginia. Also, most of the setting takes place in the Virginia forest where Powhatan’s house was located and many other sites. In the Disney Pocahontas, the setting takes place in the real Jamestown and where Pocahontas was during her entire time in the movie. Some of the places where Pocahontas was are; the waterfall where Smith and her meet, the tribe’s cornfield, the place where the willow tree is located, and the tribe’s location. Unlike the documentary, the Disney movie gives an idea of what Jamestown and Powhatan's tribe looked like before it faded away. However, some of the similarities in the setting would be Jamestown and
These pieces are both very similar, but the movie has its own twist, therefore transforming The Odyssey into a movie about a prisoner’s epic journey. The movie really has a good way in trasforming the book. They are not exactly the same, which makes the movie very interesting and fun to compare all of the events of The
As a young child many of us are raised to be familiar with the Pocahontas and John Smith story. Whether it was in a Disney movie or at a school play that one first learned of Jamestown, students want to believe that this romantic relationship really did occur. As one ages, one becomes aware of the dichotomy between fact and fiction. This is brilliantly explained in David A. Price's, Love and Hate in Jamestown. Price describes a more robust account of events that really did take place in the poorly run, miserable, yet evolving settlement of Jamestown, Virginia; and engulfs and edifies the story marketed by Disney and others for young audiences. Price reveals countless facts from original documents about the history of Jamestown and other fledgling colonies, John Smith, and Smith's relationship with Pocahontas. He develops a more compelling read than does the typical high school text book and writes intriguingly which propels the reader, to continue on to the successive chapters in the early history of Virginia.
To conclude with “The General History of Virginia” and Disney’s version of Pocahontas, the two stories had two different opinions and views. Although, Disney’s portrayal of Pocahontas was perceived as an offense to the Native Americans, no one really knows the actual events that took place during that time. People will continue to think that John Smith’s version was a bit hysterical, while the Native Americans will take the Disney movie Pocahontas to an offense. John Smith and Disney both gave their own versions of their story. Others will continue to do the same.
Sixteen years after premiering as Disney’s thirty-third animated film, Pocahontas still incites excitement and wonder within those who wish for nothing more than to be a Disney princess. As Disney’s most notable attempt at political correctness, Pocahontas was created to entertain while attempting to maintain authenticity in regards to historical accuracy and in its fairness of depicting Native American culture. Jacquelyn Kilpatrick, the author of “Disney’s ‘Politically Correct’ Pocahontas”, feels the movie not only failed at being historically accurate but that it fell far short of being politically correct. The article, which appeared in the Fall, 1995 issue of Cineaste, contends the Disney production was duty bound in preserving the integrity of the Pocahontas legend and being both multiculturally and socially inoffensive. However, if being politically correct and constantly factual within any version of media made for entertainment were the standard, we would be left with documentaries and non-fiction. Artistic license allows for a literal account of events to become an engaging, accessible production.
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
The first difference in the movie was an old boar named Old Major, and his speech before he died. In the movie, the speech was mostly the same except he did not say the seven commandments. Old Major's death was different because he died the night he gave his speech, instead of three days later as in the book. The second difference was that the movie never had a horse named Molly. In the book, Molly runs away for ribbons and sugar which she could not have due to Animal Farm's rules. Molly was later found with a human who fed her sugar and put ribbons in her mane. She was then branded as a traitor by the pigs on Animal Farm. The animals on Animal Farm censure her and never see Molly ever
One of the differences include when Jem and Scout had had decided to sneak out to go over to Boo Radleys. Jem and Scout heard Nathan Radley come out and load a shotgun they then ran back home. Once home, Jem was caught without pants and questioned about it. Later that night Jem ran back to get them and found them folded and crookedly patched up as if someone knew he would be coming back for them. In the movie right after this happened Jem ran back for his pants, but he didn't wait like in the book. Instead in the movie, it shows Jem coming back right after to retrieve his pants, this is when Radley came out with his shotgun. This scene should have been acted out as it was in the book b...
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain is a classic novel about a young boy who struggles to save and free himself from captivity, responsibility, and social injustice. Along his river to freedom, he aids and befriends a runaway slave named Jim. The two travel down the Mississippi, hoping to reach Cairo successfully. However, along the way they run into many obstacles that interrupt their journey. By solving these difficult tasks, they learn life lessons important to survival.
On both the story and the movie “The Cat In The Hat” have a lot of differences, and similarities. The differences is that the fish in the movie has a name, and another difference is that Cat was balancing the fish. The similarity between the two, is that both had the mom leave, and both follow the same story line. Even though they both different, they’re both great stories to listen, or read
The similarities are quite apparent, the movie plot mainly follows the basic plot that the book took, leaving the viewer’s with a sense of accomplishment, as this is sometimes not achieved in the highest degree. Scout still has a brother, Jem. They both still meet Dill and have a few adventures with him throughout the film. Jem and Scout still have a single father, Atticus, having lost their mother many years ago. Calpunia is still their cook. And the whole story still has an overpowering sense of focusing on two main stories, Boo Radley (Arthur Radley) and Tom Robinson’s trial.
Ironically, John Smith and Pocahontas grew up in two different cultures as well as very different social statuses within their cultures. Incidentally, there is a sixteen-year age gap between Pocahontas and John Smith; she was a mere eleven years old when they had their first encounter. John Smith was born in 1580 in Willoughby,
I prefer to read the book because it gave me more imaginations to construct. On the other hand the movie gave us lively and specific scenes. Therefore, both of them have their own advantages.
Second there is more detail in the book than the movie. Well, I think that more detail is better because the more you know the better you understand the movie or
Disney’s intentions were more than to captivate young children. They were ultimately to retell the original story of Pocahontas and the settlers and to address social issues of lifestyle and acceptance depending on race and the way they are being treated, proving that marriage isn’t all that important and addressing familial gender roles in society based on having a mother figure. Since 1995, the story of Pocahontas serves to entertain the young minds of children, but none the less the messages for seen in the movie, are mentioned to stress the issues of a series of systems in which maintain the imbalance of power among society’s social organization.
The first comparisons between mythology and the Disney film are ones pertaining to the nature of Hercules character. In both film and myth Hercules exemplifies the hero myth and goes through what is known as the Hero’s Journey. In both stories eventually Hercules becomes a hero. In the movie Hercules was born