Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Power greed and ambition in julius caesar shakespeare
Power greed and ambition in julius caesar shakespeare
Analysis of Julius Caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Natalie Anne Vargas Vargas 1
Mr. Lyman
English II
20 November 2013
The Plan
In Shakespeare's, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony's persistence, anger towards the conspirators, and powerful words was why the crowd changed its mind so quickly. His persistence started as he imposed himself to Brutus to let him speak in the funeral. Antony finally accepted with the condition that he would speak at the pulpit after Brutus' speech. He also agreed that he should not speak bad of the conspirators. Antony agreed to these terms and patiently waited his turn to speak after Brutus.
The speeches given by both Brutus and Mark Antony in William Shakespeare’s, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar are very persuasive to the audience. Mark Antony delivers a strong funeral oration in Caesar's honor. Antony was a trusted friend of Caesar and he manipulated the conspirators in thinking that he was fine with their deed. Antony uses a kind of mode of persuasion in order to convince the audience that Caesar is worthy kind of man. Antony then must use pathos in order to call the emotion of the audience. He must have to understand the nature of the audience to successfully induce his audience that Caesar really was not an ambitious man. After Brutus's speech ended it was Antony’s turn but Brutus made a big mistake by leaving as Antony started his speech. Antony starts his speech by saying, "friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears! I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him" (3. 2. 70). He immediately starts using rhetoric and calculated dramatic words to incite the crowd into a frenzy.
...
... middle of paper ...
...ulsion and hate. Antony's dramatic speech won the crowd over and resulted in a downfall.
In conclusion, Antony is a far more condescending speaker compared to Brutus in William Shakespeare’s, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Antony was able to persuade the audience into feeling sorrow toward Caesar and anger toward Brutus. Antony's speech carries the pieces of emotion and intellect making it an overall more powerful speech than Brutus. All Antony ever wished for and wanted was to win over the crowd. On the other hand, Brutus does not try to persuade the crowd but only wished to express his reasoning and instead, he actually announces he will kill himself if they wish to. Brutus made a big mistake by letting Antony speak at Caesar's funeral. Finally, Antony shows his superiority by clearly making Brutus look like a trader, a back stabber and a bad friend.
In Julius Caesar two men, Antony and Brutus, make two different speeches but with the same concept of ethos, logos, and pathos at Caesar's funeral. Brutus claims that it is okay that he killed Caesar and makes a speech about it. Antony is the more persuasive speaker than Brutus because he uses ethos, pathos, and logos better than Brutus. Brutus has a way with the people. He is a politician, and he knows how to get the people on his side.
The book Julius Caesar is full of happiness, conspiracy, power, and betrayal. The people of Rome deeply loved julius Caesar and wished to make him their king. A group of senators however were not so fond of this idea and formed a conspiracy. The leader of this group was a man by the name of Cassius. In order to make sure that his scheme of killing Caesar would work and would look honorable he had to convince a senator by the name of Brutus to help. After being convinced that they had to kill Caesar to protect Rome from a tyrant Brutus joined the conspiracy and soon became the principal conspirator.On the day in which Caesar was to be crowned king he was on the way to the senate when he was stabbed by all the conspirators panic ensued and to convince Rome of their honorable intentions Brutus gave a funeral speech. Mark Antony, a very close friend of Caesar, gave his speech after Brutus had given his. Mark Antony’s speech is more persuasive to the Roman people because of his outstanding use of pathos, sarcasm, and logos.
Each ruler of Rome seemed to have made poor decisions, and this is exactly what occurred with Brutus. Brutus became very naïve. All of the conspirators confronted Brutus with the idea of killing Mark Antony. They believed he would continue Caesar’s legacy but Brutus thought differently. Brutus added, “And for Mark Antony, think not of him, for he can do no more than Caesar’s arm” (Shakespeare, 24). He proposed that Antony was too weak for them to worry about while this was actually what brought about his fall. When the murder of Caesar had concluded, Antony wished to speak in honor of Caesar. Brutus agreed with the idea but Cassius was hesitant. Cassius insulted, “You know not what you do. Do not consent that Antony speak in his funeral. Know you how much the people may be moved by that which he will utter” (Shakespeare, 44). Cassius feared that Antony’s persuasive speech would turn the citizens against the conspirators. Brutus continued to ignore Cassius’s warning, but was proven wrong immediately. The locals were influenced by Antony and led an angered march to end the conspirators. Brutus caused their arrangement to fail by lack of
Shakespeare uses dramatic pathos, ethos, repetition and logos in the case of Antony to make his speech memorable in his effectiveness to sway the audience’s opinion. William’s use of Antony having the last word and subterfuge powerfully displayed a moment of literature memorable for the art of persuasion and manipulation. He veiled the true intent. The weaker written speech for Brutus had one effective point. The point that he killed Caesar for Rome. The breakdown of Brutus’s speech makes readers feel the tension and
In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare wrote two different speeches that characters Mark Antony and Brutus delivered. Both had different objectives. Antony and Brutus were both good friends of Julius Caesar. Antony was a Roman and general. Brutus was a senator. After the assassination of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony prepared a speech on the behalf of Caesar's death. Brutus went first, then Antony followed after him, and both of speeches had different reactions from the citizens of Rome. Brutus and Antony's speeches had as to their intentions and its outcome.
In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, although Marc Antony is allowed to make a speech at Caesar's funeral, he must not speak ill of either the conspirators or Caesar. Antony was infuriated with Caesar's assassination, and wants to seek revenge on his killers as well as gain power for himself in Rome's government. He must persuade the crowd that has gathered that Caesar's murder was unjust, and turn them against Brutus and Cassius. He tries to stir his listeners' anger, rousing them into action and yet say nothing bad about his enemies. Marc Antony uses several persuasive devices in his speech, which allows him to successfully convince the citizens of Rome to turn against the conspirators.
In the wake of Caesars assassination, Marc Antony speaks on behalf of his friend at his funeral. Antony persuades the hostile crowd to listen to his ideas, to disprove Brutus’ claim, and urge them to seek revenge for Caesar. Antony hides his sarcasm under the guise solemnity and appeals to the romans ethics, ideas, and emotions in order to manipulate them into following him.
The Shakespearean play, Julius Caesar, is a complete drama in which the use of rhetoric and the various styles used in famous speeches. One being in Act 3 scene 1, the gloriously spoken Antony’s Lament. In this speech Antony remarks on several bad things that will fall onto Rome because of this bloodshed of Caesar. Those being a civil war, gruesome blood and destruction, and finally Caesar’s spirit seeking revenge with the Goddess Ate. In the passage Antony uses a swift but powerful delivery to tap into the emotions of the audience. This use of pathos really makes it more interesting to examine and break down his statement to the maximum extent.
Dear Fellow Senators, I am present today to share with you that I believe Julius Caesar should live. I support this opinion because Julius was one of the greatest generals and leaders in ancient history. Also, he made many improvements in society. Finally, Julius was considered a military genius. I assure you that after I am finished with this speech, you will support my position that Julius should live.
He reads Caesar’s will and he also shows them the dead body which really wins the crowd over. This then shows the human morals they have and they want to kill Brutus and the conspirators. This happens so much so that the citizens go away to try and find Brutus and the other conspirators and, kill them. Which means that Mark Antony won them over and, that’s because he was very smart using his words. Finally, at the end of his speech he says he is going to get back at them and, the crowd wants to also.
In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Mark Antony—a loyal friend to Julius Caesar, the former emperor of Rome—gives a speech to the Roman commoners in order to persuade them to turn against Brutus, for Brutus and the conspirators had slain Caesar. Antony’s uses rough and sharp diction, a scornful tone, and honest anecdotes in order to achieve his purpose of manipulating the common people to take his side.
After Caesar was killed, Antony and Brutus both gave rhetoric speeches at Caesar’s funeral. Both Antony and Brutus used many different methods of speaking to make their speech persuasive. Antony’s speech definitely won the people over and had the most effect on them. Overall I think that Antony’s speech was better and more persuasive than Brutus’s speech.
Antony utilizes his skill in pathos during his funeral speech. Knowing that the crowd was very emotional following Brutus's speech, he riles them up once more. For example, Antony asks, "You all did love him once, not without cause:/What cause withholds you then to mourn for him?” This rhetorical question makes the mob remember when it loved and celebrated Caesar. Furthermore, Antony creates
Actions at some moments in Julius Caesar speak louder than words. A prime example is when Cassius wants the men to make a pact to follow through with the murder, but Brutus speaks up and says that the pact is unnecessary. Brutus feels as though every man is a true Roman and each man is as trustworthy and noble as he. As for Antony's speech, this is a whole different story. The words Antony spoke to the public helped motivate the people to go against the conspirators. Thought the action of killing Caesar was a publicized one, Antony's speech was far from being unnoticed.
In the play “Julius Caesar”, both Mark Antony and Brutus give compelling and effective arguments after the murder of Julius Caesar. They include similar points in their speeches, but the way they present is very different. Although both give strong performances, Mark Antony’s delivery and content of his speech is more effective than the speech Brutus presents.