Persuasive Essay On Euthanasia

1166 Words3 Pages

Physician-assisted suicide or 'Euthanasia ' is the primary act of laying a sickly person to rest if their suffering exceeds the point of living. In many cases Euthanasia is necessary to cease the pain that a suffering person must live with.

To relieve the suffering of both the patient and the family members. Oftentimes a patient can be under such extreme and severe pain that only they are able to experience, and they may not be able to communicate with a physician to put an end to their suffering; or even speak to their own family members for that matter. Whether the condition is coma induced, a cancer, a severe heart problem, a major stroke, parkinsons etc. Medical conditions are a touchy subject, because a medical dysfunction such as a …show more content…

If a man with Type 2 Neurofibromatosis is in a hospital bed for four months in agonizing pain, knowing there is no cure, and surgeries with almost 0 success rate will make his pain worse; he should not have to wait anxiously for his day of reckoning to come and his pain to be silenced. Occasionally families may hold on to their loved ones longer than they can bare, coming off of the autonomy talk. If a family member that is suffering wants to end their pain with PAD or PAS, their family should not be able to keep them from doing so. One person is entitled to their body and with it the choices they deem liable, so their family should not have the right to withhold a suffering family member from choosing to end their agonizing pain. Stephen Hawking, PhD, cosmologist and theoretical physicist, in a Sep. 17, 2013 interview with the BBC, "I think those who have a terminal illness and are in great pain should have the right to choose to end their lives and those that help them should be free from prosecution. We don’t let animals suffer, so why humans?" Stephen Hawking, a PhD theoretical physicist correlates his subject to animals, explaining how humans don 't let animals such as dogs and cats suffer when they grow old or sick, so why should humans have to stick around to suffer if they are terminally …show more content…

Government officials, mayors, governors, doctors etc. agree with PAD or PAS respectively to aim for a peace of mind and comfort in a boggy situation. ' 'On May 20, 2013, Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin signed a legislative bill making PAD legal in Vermont. ' ' (Terri Hallenbeck) [1] "In 2008, the electorate of the state of Washington voted in favor of Initiative 1000 which made assisted suicide legal in the state through the Washington Death With Dignity Act." [2] In 1999, the state of Texas passed the Advanced Directives Act. Under the law, in some situations, Texas hospitals and physicians have the right to withdraw life support measures, such as mechanical respiration, from terminally ill patients when such treatment is considered to be both futile and inappropriate. [3] In the United States legal and ethical debates about euthanasia became more prominent in the case of Karen Ann Quinlan who went into a coma after allegedly mixing tranquilizers with alcohol, surviving biologically for 9 years in a "persistent vegetative state" even after the New Jersey Supreme Court approval to remove her from a respirator. This case caused a widespread public concern about "lives not worth living" and the possibility of at least voluntary euthanasia if it could be ascertained that the patient

Open Document