Path-Goal Theory And Situational Leadership

1. Choose two of the six frameworks we discussed regarding leadership contingency, and show those two to an experienced leader. Post in the discussion board what you learn from this, first summarizing their reactions.
The two frameworks that I chose regarding leadership contingency are situational leadership and path-goal theories. I chose to discuss these topics with my current manager.
The first framework that I discussed was situational leadership. In describing situational leadership as task-relevant, and that the most successful leaders are those who adapt their leadership style to the maturity ("the capacity to set high but attainable goals, willingness and ability to take responsibility for the task, and relevant education and/or experience

In describing path-goal theories, I said that a leader's behavior is contingent to the satisfaction, motivation and performance of her or his subordinates. My manager said that he had heard of this theory and while he wasn’t that familiar, he felt that at times he did partake in its assumptions. He liked the fact that the path-goal theory assumes that leaders are flexible and that they can change their style, as situations require. He felt that every manager should take notice of this theory and conscientiously choose to practice it. After all, employees interpret their leader's behavior based on their needs, such as the degree of structure they need, affiliation, perceived level of ability, and desire for control. For example, if a leader provides more structure than what they need, they become less motivated. Thus a leader needs to understand their employees so they know how to best motivate

The concept of Fair Trade coffee is great in theory but it was interesting to shin the light on exactly what it entails to be “fair trade certified” and whether or not it is actually beneficial and/or more “fair” to growers. In Starbucks’ “Fiscal 2007 Corporate Social Responsibility Annual Report,” Starbucks defines CSR as conducting business in ways that produce social, environmental and economic benefits for the communities in which we operate and for the company’s stakeholders, including shareholders. Starbucks has taken more steps than simply accepting the full principles of Fair Trade. Besides adhering to the purchase of “Fair Trade” coffee, Starbucks is also committed to building a resilient supply chain through partnerships. Climate change represents significant immediate and long-term risks to coffee farmers around the world, and Starbucks is looking at its potential impacts with organizations such as CI. As a result of this work, Starbucks has incorporated agricultural methods into C.A.F.E. Practices that help reduce emissions, improve carbon storage through shade and conservation areas, and proactively manage climate risks from pests and disease. Also, in 2014, Starbucks made a series of origin community grants, funded by sales of their Ethos Water brand, to support critical infrastructure improvements and agricultural diversification projects. For example, in Tanzania, they’re working with Heifer International