Pam Lablanc Case Summary

248 Words1 Page

1. How did Steve Heller define the problem describe in this case? How did Pam LaBlanc define the problem? How did the problem definition affect the way these two people initially solved the problem? Steve define the problem as the Costco cashiers were not being productive. Detailing the cashier process was making the checkout counter moved more slowly according to Costco’s standard. Steve wants ideas in making the checkout move more swiftly. LaBlanc defined the problem as assistance needs to be more involved in the training of the employee. LaBlanc wanted the feeling of contributing as a team or team involvement. LaBlac generated the ideas and Heller implemented those ideas. 2. What advantages and disadvantages of group decision making does

In this essay, the author

  • Analyzes how steve heller and pam lablanc define the problem in this case. steve wants ideas in making the checkout move more swiftly, while pam wants the feeling of contributing as a team.
  • Illustrates the advantages and disadvantages of group decision making. heller can apply what he learned from this experience to improve cashier performance.
Show More

More about Pam Lablanc Case Summary

Open Document