Organizational Determinants In Police Behavior

1242 Words3 Pages

Police behavior has been the focus of much attention over the past few decades in academia and the media due to rising crime rates and growing public dissatisfaction. Researchers have focused on behaviors shaped by a number of individual, situational, and environmental factors. There are four particular types of police behavior often studied: discretion, use of force, arrest, and community policing. Organizational determinants include any characteristics of the police organization as a whole that could influence behavior including administration, different policies, department size, and levels of supervision. Individual determinants include both legal and extra-legal factors. Legal factors typically refer to strength or amount of evidence, …show more content…

Extra-legal factors can be situational such as characteristics of police-citizen encounters that may influence how an officer acts during a situation, or other situational factors that are much more controversial including suspect characteristics like race, age, sex, demeanor, socio-economic status, and the neighborhood context in which the offense has occurred. Other determinants that could also potentially influence officer behavior include public expectations, political expectations and preferences, and any other community factor that may influence officer decision-making.
Organizational determinants are important in explaining police officer behavior, and include administrative rules and regulations, policies, and styles of police behavior. James Q. Wilson (1978) identifies three styles of policing: watchmen style, legalistic style, and service style. These three …show more content…

Intra-organizational determinants include division or labor, nature of supervision, and strategies or police work. “Team policing” an example discussed by Sherman, gave officers complete responsibility for performing all police tasks in one geographic area. The implementation of team policing changed the supervision and patrol strategy for each police organization. Although he found team policing as a strategy increased police calls for service, his results were mixed about the effect the strategy had on arrest and clearance rates. Sherman also examined the Kansas City preventive patrol initiative, and found no measurable difference in crime rates either. Although police enforcement strategies appeared to influence level of violence, there was no discernible difference in arrest and clearance rates. The implementation of new innovations or strategies for improving performance, like that of Team Policing, represent big changes in police departments, and police behavior depends on the reception to these innovations and the changes they bring to each department. Other innovations include CompStat, or literally computer statistics of crime mapping, problem-oriented policing, or solving nuisances before they become a bigger issue, hot-spot policing, or heavy policing in spots known for crime, and community-policing, or that of building a better relationship

Open Document