Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Community Policing Partnership
Police organisational structure and culture
History of policing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Community Policing Partnership
History of police Culture The word culture means a group of people sharing the same beliefs, values, knowledge and behavior. The culture of policemen evolved as with the development of policing. Policeman is individuals empowered by the state to enforce law, serve and protect. The word police have a history from a Greek word called politeia. The word politeia in Greek was used to refer to dealings that affected the stability and safety of the Greek State. In the 18 century the word “police” were taken from the French and brought into the English language. King Louis XlV organized the first central police force in 1667 to police Paris, because back then Paris was the largest city in Europe. August “Gus” Vollmer was known as the father of policing because he started the first school, where officers could learn the law of evidence. In 1905 August became the first chief in Berkeley, California. He also was the first chief to tell his department to use the lie detector. August Vollmer was the first American officer to incorporate the use of blood, fiber, and analysis in a criminal investigation. Technology in policing began to advance in the 1800’s. DNA was discovered 1868, and in 1882 Alphonse Bertillon used anthropometrics as a mean of identification. As years past they continue advancing in policing. How policing is run now and how it was ran in the early years are totally different. Strict laws and consequences are put into place, and by then there was any. All these things affect police culture, and that’s what makes culture of policing different then the culture of policing in the early years. (According to Inciardi in 1990, police develop resources in order to deal with their isolation from the community that results from ... ... middle of paper ... ...es have found that often police misconduct is learned behavior from in his organization. Police culture is defined and broken down by artifacts. Artifacts like learning police jargon, how to talk on their radio, how to write a report. I think a counter act to this problem is more community policing. Officers should volunteer a little time reach back out to the community, getting to know the people of the community will help how people view police culture and actually help the culture also. I don’t want to be a cop so I feel this information is not relevant to my field of chose. Works Cited http://www.abuseofpower.info/culture_Brotherhood.htm http://voices.yahoo.com/police-culture-sub-culture-3404808.html http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/38432_4.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/police Criminal Investigations 10th edition By: Christine Hess and Karen Matison Hess
...an also affect the integrity of a department. The book states that “if the police culture influences the level of police misconduct, it is important to change it” (Pollock 208) This culture can lead officers to believe that what others are doing is ok, and, that in turn, makes it okay for them to do it also. These views and actions can be changed by a change in supervision or by taking ethics classes.
It is both a result and a cause of police isolation from the larger society and of police solidarity. Its influence begins early in the new officer’s career when he is told by more experienced officers that the “training given in police academies is irrelevant to ‘real’ police work”. What is relevant, recruits are told, is the experience of senior officers who know the ropes or know how to get around things. Recruits are often told by officers with considerable experience to forget what they learned in the academy and in college and to start learning real police work as soon as they get to their Field Training Officers. Among the first lessons learned are that police officers share secrets among themselves and that those secrets especially when they deal with activities that are questionable in terms of ethics, legality, and departmental policy, are not to be told to others. They also are told that administrators and Internal Affairs officers cannot often be trusted. This emphasis on the police occupational subculture results in many officers regarding themselves as members of a “blue
Policing in the United States has mainly been based and expanded on the ideas of English way of policing. The English way of policing has not only been used as the basis for American policing but it has also been used to commence an era of evolving police agencies. In its early years, policing in the United States was largely regarded as a civic duty or responsibility of community members. The appointed officers were neither trained nor paid for their services to community members. Consequently, the chosen Sheriffs were usually motivated by financial incentives and lost their focus on enforcement of the law, which contributed to the perception that policing was primarily reactive in nature. However, the nature and structure of policing changed significantly following the emergence of urbanization, industrialism, and the society, which resulted in increase in crime. This forced the police or law enforcement officers to adopt a more proactive approach rather than the reactive approach that was traditionally associated with law enforcement. Notably, the history of policing has been characterized by considerable changes from time to time due to several factors like technological advancements and increase in threats to security.
Police misconduct is as rampant as ever in America, and it has become a fixture of the news cycle. Police brutality is the use of any force exceeding that reasonably necessary to accomplish a lawful police purpose. The media is inevitably drawn toward tales of conflict, hence why there are so many crime and police stories on the news. Despite the increasing frequency of misbehaving cops, many Americans still maintain a high respect for the man in uniform. Still, police misconduct is a systemic problem, not just an anecdotal one. Here are some reasons why it is a problem. First, many departments do not provide adequate training in nonviolent solutions. With this, police are unfamiliar with what to
This principle embodies the fundamental premise for the community policing movement in today’s society. In the past, the “police” were viewed in a tradition...
We must take actions to reform police behavior! The problem is not the police nor the people of the United States, but the Federal Government system in which we all have to abide by. In order for a police reform to be implemented, the system has to be fixed and reconstructed. The people of the United States want to feel protected by the police, but on the other hand, they receive limited training on how to effectively interact with the people in the community they serve. Police officers are ordained by the power of the government. Police reform should start by giving proper training to new recruits and veterans, enforcing community policing and police accountability.
The Political Era of policing occurred in the early 1800’s and lasted until the 1930’s, and was under the direct influence of the local government and politicians. There were benefits of political influence; police departments began to develop intimate relationships within their communities offering a wide array of services to citizens. For example, the police worked soup kitchens and provided temporary housing for immigrants searching for work (Peak, 2015). In addition to providing an array of services to the community, officers were integrated into neighborhoods, which helped to prevent and contain riots. Typically, officers were assigned to neighborhoods where they lived or had the same ethnic background. Police departments
During the late 1800s the police force standards were the beginning for a new reform. August Vollmer approach was professional policing, demanding education and training. The training consisted of: preventive patrol, quick response time, and follow up investigation. Forty years into professional policing, community policing disagreed that the new era did not reduce crime. “What was emerging was the view that unattended disorderly behavior in neighborhoods—such as unruly groups of youths, prostitution, vandalism, drunk and disorderly vagrants, and aggressive street people” (Bohm & Haley, 2014, p. 150).
Talking about Europe, the Law Enforcement system intrinsically incorporates the notion of police. The word "police" is Greek and originally meant a state, city (Wakefield, 2009). From the XIV century, its value begins to change, and by the police, over time, people began to see only the activities in the field of public order, which were carried out by state coercion. In the modern form the police unit was formed in Europe around the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. During this period of history was finally completed the process of functionally-organized formation of police systems in most of its countries.
The process of change in American, had three eras that played an important role in how citizens around the world would look at police in general. Over a decade the police system would go through many changes. How a police should act, how they should go about their business, and how to deal with the general public. Some citizen look to the police for protection, and many just hate the site of seeing a police officer. The three eras that change and molded what we know as Police was the political Era (1840-1930), The Reform Era (1930-1980), and The Community Problem-Solving Era (1980-1995).
American policing originated from early English law and is profoundly influenced by its history. Early law enforcement in England took on two forms of policing, one of which heavily influenced modern policing and it is known as the watch (Potter, 2013). The watch consisted, at first, of volunteers which had to patrol the streets for any kind of disorder including crime and fire. After men attempted to get out of volunteering by paying others, it became a paid professional position (Walker & Katz, 2012). The three eras of policing in America are shaped by these early ideas and practices of law enforcement. Throughout time, sufficient improvements and advancements have been made from the political era to the professional era and finally the community era which attempts to eliminate corruption, hire qualified officers and create an overall effective law enforcement system.
Both of these articles were focused on the Strategy of Policing, but the author’s approaches to the ‘hot topics,’ couldn’t be more difficult. Williams and Murphy focused on the different eras of policing, and how the racial conflicts have overlapped policing efforts. Whereas, Kelling and Moore focused on how police have evolved with the eras. The articles were dramatically different, however, the policing eras: Political, Reform, and Community Orientated eras were influenced largely as the main focuses for each academic article.
Police academy is pretty much the nerve center for every cop, that’s when each individual is molded to fit the slogan “To Serve and To Protect”. Each cop is suppose to learn to use force as the last option, to approach each situation with a mature mentality, to de escalate any out of control circumstances. “Are you familiar with the work of William J. Lewinski? Unless you are a cop, that name probably doesn’t ring a bell… he is the father, architect and chief defender of the modern police brutality epidemic… he has trained tens of thousands of police officers to shoot first and ask questions later” (Shaun King). Records show that Lewinski has been called to testify on behalf of police officers who have used lethal force. His answers were robotic and predictable. Maybe police reform in America starts with stage 1, training, it needs to be done the right way. We need to be able to give these “soon to be” officers the proper changing them while molding them to protect and serve. That should start with Lewinski, he needs to be removed from any form of training officers. Officers need to be trained to use force as the last means of engagement. American police officers must move in this direction. The training they receive is violent and unethical. One step in the right direction would be to guarantee that every officer in America has at least three other
Cordner, G. W., & Scarborough, K. E. (2010). Police administration (7th ed.). Albany, N.Y.: LexisNexis/Anderson Pub.
Police in a community perform a large scope of public services. Depending on how one perceives the police and the reason why they are interacting with the officers usually decides if one’s experience is either a negative or positive one. For instance, if someone is pulled over for drinking while driving they may not consider their interaction with an officer a positive one. If someone locks their keys in the car and an officer comes to their rescue, then they may view their interaction with the officer as positive. However, no matter which experience someone has with the police, the officers greatest service to their community and to other officers is to have and maintain their integrity, honesty, values, standards, courage, civility, as well as their ethics in the field.