Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contemporary issues with osha
Contemporary issues with osha
Contemporary issues with osha
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contemporary issues with osha
OSHA Violations in the work place dealing on safety hazards have to be practice in the workplace every operational day of the business. Electrical is one of the concerns of all workplace, with electrical issues a major source of violations cited by the U.S.. OSHA is specific in it's electrical standards, and they entail every aspect of electrical safety, from equipment to extension cords. OSHA inspectors , are strict concerning electrical safety , and OSHA standards 1910.303(b) allows them to issue a citation by looking at a piece of electrical equipment and telling you it's unsafe.
https://www.hunker.com (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
2. Yes the safety officer handled the issue very professional and even beyond,because he left the heater with her. There could've been an issue that could've lead to a deadly sitiuation with the heater after he left it with her the 1st time. Example she could've gotten so busy forgot about it and some tripped over the cord. Causing it to knock the heater down under the desk where there's no visual on it and that could've lead to a fire if the floor was carpet and now your out of business , work, and clients have to find another doctor office that will accept them.
…show more content…
The are laws that place rules in an workplace dealing with fire safety and electrical standards. Electrical cords have to be place and certain working place to be non visible and also in most doctors office the temperature has to be a certain degree to keep down the risk of staff infections, bacteria , and disease control. If the officer knows indeed shes in violation int the office he can take both and have her remove from her work
The OSH Act gave OSHA the authority to come into work places and inspect facilities for health and safety risks. Due to shortages in personnel, OSHA inspects accidents and safety complaints that are filed, and those facilities that have a high volume of accident rates. If an individual state has an approved safety and health enforcement plan, than they may be exempt from yearly inspections by OSHA and have their own state personnel conduct the inspections. The Act sets a maximum penalty for safety and health violations, but OSHA has the authority to calculate fines. If an industry objects to the citation or fines, they can go before the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. OSHA has been criticized on both ends, by industries for being too strict, and by unions for not being strict enough. In the 1980s, OSHA had instituted a policy that would exempt some workplaces from a complete inspection if they had a lower than average injury rate. However, that policy was abandoned when an employee died from a workplace that OSHA had not fully inspected. OSHA has implemented new procedures that have set higher penalties and increased the maximum fine for all types of infractions.
Based on the case, I came to conclude that this case is a reckless behavior issue. According to the case, we know that the sonographer knew that the policy is not to leave a patient who has cognitive issues alone while waiting for an escort. However, this sonographer decided to leave because his shift was over after he pages for the escorts. This is a reckless behavior because the sonographer knew that he could not leave a patient unattended or alone until other healthcare professional come and take the patient. He was aware that it was wrong to leave a cognitive patient alone. However, he chose to leave because his shift was over. From my perspective, I strongly agree that his action is not justifiable because he decided to leave the patient
The original employee that observed the incident should follow established local emergency procedures and then contact upper management.
In his essay Occupational Hazards: Why Military Operations Succeed or Fail, David Edelstein makes the case that though there is no perfect recipe for occupation, three factors do increase the likelihood of success. These are ensuring a necessity of occupation, having a commonly perceived threat and establishing credible guarantees, factors that all lend to cooperation from the occupied population, and thus ensure a more agreeable occupation. Thus, recent successful occupations are predominantly found in the post World War II, at the start of the Cold War, era, for at this time both a necessity of occupation was present (the occupied populations maintained hope that the occupying states would help them rebuild their territories) as well as a commonly perceived threat, that being the Soviet Union. However, since the end of the Cold War and the United States’ rise to being the sole great power, successful occupations have been scarce to come by. Edelstein notes that occupying powers need to make more of an effort to...
Safety and OSHA News. Is OSHA really barred from enacting a new ergonomics rule? (2012,
On this date worker visited Princeton East, for the purpose of case planning with Ms. Lynn Hyche. When worker arrived, Ms. Hyche was very upset. She was shaking all over and repeated, "She made me so damn mad." After Ms. Hyche settled down, she stated a bath nurse had recently left her room and during the bath, she was very rude to her. However, she was rude with kindness. She stated the nurse keep telling her how pretty she was and how she was so funny. Ms. Hyche stated she had spoken to another hospital employee and they stated the problem would be looked at. However, Ms. Hyche doesn't believe anything will be done about it. Therefore, she wanted the DHR worker to talk to the hospital staff about the incident.
Following guidelines that OSHA puts in place are put there for a reason; however, some organizations think that OSHA tie their hands on how they run their business. Some have issues with following this because they like taking short cuts to save money, when it could cost them more if they do not follow their guidelines. The dilemma is when they are not following OSHA standards, which is putting their employee’s at risk. An example of this would be organizations such as nuclear power houses that have to keep all their OSHA records. Organizations such as factories need to have a safety personnel on staff at all times to keep the facilities OSHA compliant. When they are not in compliant there will be fines to pay.
The carpenter is entitled, under the government law, to have a protected work environment. The business must have a work environment that is wellbeing and security risk free. If the worker does not feel comfortable about anything, he or she is allowed to talk to the business without being rejected. It is illegal to be fired, demoted, or transferred for addressing something that is accepted to be a risk. If the worker has been denied in anyway, he has thirty days to record the incident. The worker does have the right to be trained for the dialect that they talk in, work on machines that have shelter, be given a security design that is needed to perform his job, be protected from any dangerous chemicals, call OSHA to come in and examine or talk with a reviewer, report any wounds or ailment get duplicates of therapeutic records, and get copies of any test results that was done to discover any risks in the work environment. There are all the more, however these rights are the most vital that a worker would need to remember. In the event that the worker believes they are working in unhealthful or dangerous environment, it is their right to get ahold of OSHA and request a review. Whenever possible, they will bring the states of the work circumstances to the business’s
United States Department of Labor (2004) Occupational Safety & Health Administration. In Guidelines for Preventing Workplace Violence for Health Care & Social Service Workers. Retrieved from http://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3148/osha3148.html
In an event of a fire at the hospital, all employees need to protect the patients and move them to a safe location. The first response to a fire drill is for each department to send someone with a fire extinguisher to the area. The fire must be contained so that other staffs can help move the patients to a safety area. Once the fire is being contained, the nurses should move the patients out one by one. Once the patient is completely removed from the room, a placard will be placed on the closed door alerting all other staff that there is no longer a patient in that room. If the patient has an airborne sickness, then the nurses trained to care for the patient must do all the necessary precaution before removing the patient. Usually these patients
The patients under Sarah’s care have the right and expect safe and effective care. The superiors have the right to a competent employee who will not cause harm to the patients and/or the facility. The facility has the right to expect non-dangerous actions by their employees. As a friend I would want to further investigate and even give my friend a chance to explain their situation. However, as a future professional nurse I know what my duties are. I know that every action has a consequence. If I do not report what I saw I risk my license; if Sarah manages to cause harm to a patient. If I report her I risk losing the trust of a friend. I would risk a reputation of tattling. I would ultimately risk my friendship with Sarah. According to the American Nurses association (ANA, 2015), the code of ethics has 9 major provisions. Specifically, provisions three and five are what a nurse professional would look into for this situation. Provision Three: The nurse promotes, advocates for and strives to protect the health, safety, and rights of the patient (ANA, 2015). This provision clearly states that as a nurse my ethical duty is to provide protection and safety to my patients. If I refused to report
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) were created in 1970 by the United Congress and President Richard Nixon to protect workers from haphazard and dangerous work zone. The national public health agency was dedicated to the basic proposition that no works should have to choose between their life and their job (https://www.osha.gov/Publications/3302-06N-2006-English.html). The principal federal law requiring private sector employees to keep their workplace free from hazards that threaten the safety and health of employees is the Occupational Safety and Health Act. The OSHA law makes it clear that the right to a safe workplace is a basic human right.
As IOM states that, the origin of patient safety problem is classified due to type (error), communication (failure between patient or patient proxy and practitioners, practitioner and non- medical staff or among practitioners), patient management (failure in tracking, wrong referral, or wrong use of resources), and clinical performance (before, during, and after intervention). According to this statement, the accident that was caused by nurse is under patient management. In my opinion, this case happened because she just wanted to finish her report in time. Why I considered this reason for this case because she told me that she has been seven years in this community hospital. And also, after that, she taught me not to be like her and said to me ‘you must check the items not only for this case but also for the other cases as a professional nurse’. So that, I really couldn’t blame on her continually. At that time, I also got shocked so I couldn’t help her to so and get the things. It can be because I was just a very new student nurse so I didn’t realize where things are placed
As it turned out the company releasing poor quality equipment hoping no one would notice, or refusing to put the extra time and money into fixing a bad batch and ship the consignment into the population. More than likely the manufacturer plays a role in the injury to the employee, if the merchandise produced is less than the expectation of quality. In addition, later, caused injury to the employee because the safety guard seems poorly designed graphically and did not function to the full potential. Yes, the company when faced with complaints that the table saw According to the Occupational Safety & Health Administration known as OSHA, safeguards must meet minimum requirements. They must prevent contact with dangerous moving parts. These instruments are safely secured and not easily remove or tamper with. Moreover, they provide protection from falling objects onto moving parts, keeping them away from sharp edges or the blades. The manufactory put on notice about the exposure of their
Furthermore, safety is always required to be ethical in workplaces. An employer should make sure that the safety of his/her employees is number one priority during working. Consequently, the physical and the psychological safety should be taken in consideration between the employers and employees, and among the employees themselves. beside safety, quality and productivity, honesty, and punctuality, privacy of workers, employers, and the work information is a crucial ethic of work that should be built in such a good workplace. Despite all mentioned ethics of work, in some work place ethical issues happen due to different manners. At the beginning of 2013, I was