My Cumulative Reflection Letter

707 Words2 Pages

Cumulative Reflection Letter Over the course of the semester, I have learned a lot regarding the process of writing. When comparing my open letter to my DSP, it is very clear how much this process has progressed for me. When writing my DSP, I wrote the initial draft and then edited for grammar, but not really content. When writing my open letter I made quite a few changes to content and had more rounds of revision. My process was as follows: I wrote a brief outline, then I wrote the first draft, then considering the comments that I usually make on my peers’ essays I made structural and content changes, then I sent my essay to my peers for feedback, then I made even more content changes, then I received instructor feedback, then I made even more content changes, and finally I made the final grammatical changes. Clearly, the process for the open letter was significantly longer than the …show more content…

The most notable being that in my DSP, I stuck to a very standardized test structure. Though I didn’t follow the common five paragraph model that you frequently see in high school, I stuck to a structure that basically did the same thing. Rather than have every paragraph push the point further, as I did a much better job with in the open letter, each paragraph in my DSP is a unconnected point. Another huge organizational aspect that differs from my DSP, is that in my open letter I did not force my thesis to be in the first paragraph. The idea of having a thesis in the first paragraph is an idea that was engraved into many brain in high school and most of the time isn’t really effective. In my open letter, the thesis made very little sense without context so it was extremely important that I dedicate my introduction to giving the readers a better idea of what I was writing about. This made it so that the thesis logically fell in the second paragraph. Before this course I wouldn’t have dared to do

More about My Cumulative Reflection Letter

Open Document