Mussolini And Stalin Comparison

763 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Stalin's economic program

Stalin and Mussolini Stalin and Mussolini had their differences like Stalin rose to power through communism while Mussolini rose there through fascism. Another difference is that Mussolini was executed while Stalin died of natural causes. Even though Mussolini and Stalin have their differences they had more common occurrences. They both used propaganda and fear to control their people, they also had a secret police. The last two were that they brought economics under control and an purge or act of terror had occurred. Therefor Stalin and Mussolini are more alike rather than different.
Stalin rose to power through communism. The Soviet Union was founded in 1922, with Lenin as its first leader. During these years, Stalin had continued to move up the party ladder, and in 1922 he became secretary general of the Central Committee of the Communist Party, a role that enabled him to appoint his allies to government jobs and grow a base of political support. Mussolini rose to power through fascism. He ruled “in October 1922, Mussolini led the Fascists on a march on Rome, and King Emmanuel III, who had little faith in Italy’s parliamentary government, asked Mussolini to form a new government”(History.com Staff).
Mussolini was executed while Stalin died of natural causes. The reason Mussolini …show more content…

Stalin made an 5 year plan or FYP to help Russia get back to where West is economically. It didn't work the first time but the second FYP worked and the economic percent went up 25%. With the percent going up 25% they benefited from new jobs, electrified. Then Mussolini was in power he kept fascist regime extending and with an good fascist policies like protected the Italian economy from the Great Depression and allowed the modernization of Italy to continue . With the modernizing continuing the number of schools increased 20% and there were new motorways

Show More
Related

  • Italian and German Fascism: Similarities and Differences

    1022 Words  | 3 Pages

    Fascism is one of the great political ideology in the 20th century. It is a kind of authoritarian government that, according to Wikipedia, “considers the individual subordinate to the interests of the state, party or society as a whole.” Two of the most successful and to be in the vanguard of fascism government is Italian fascism – led by Benito Mussolini, and Nazi Germany – led by Adolf Hitler. Fascism in Italy and Germany, though in many regards very similar - have the same political ideologies, still have many aspects to them that make them different from each other. Before analysing the similarities and differences between the fascism that emerged in Italy and Germany since the very first of 20th century, it is better to discover - what is fascism.

    Read More

  • Totalitarian Government: Hitler and Stalin

    1102 Words  | 3 Pages

    Following the beginning of the Second World War, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany and Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union would start what would become two of the worst genocides in world history. These totalitarian governments would “welcome” people all across Europe into a new domain. A domain in which they would learn, in the utmost tragic manner, the astonishing capabilities that mankind possesses. Nazis and Soviets gradually acquired the ability to wipe millions of people from the face of the Earth. Throughout the war they would continue to kill millions of people, from both their home country and Europe. This was an effort to rid the Earth of people seen as unfit to live in their ideal society. These atrocities often went unacknowledged and forgotten by the rest of the world, leaving little hope for those who suffered. Yet optimism was not completely dead in the hearts of the few and the strong. Reading Man is Wolf to Man: Surviving the Gulag by Janusz Bardach and Survival in Auschwitz by Primo Levi help one capture this vivid sense of resistance toward the brutality of the German concentration and Soviet work camps. Both Bardach and Levi provide a commendable account of their long nightmarish experience including the impact it had on their lives and the lives of others. The willingness to survive was what drove these two men to achieve their goals and prevent their oppressors from achieving theirs. Even after surviving the camps, their mission continued on in hopes of spreading their story and preventing any future occurrence of such tragic events. “To have endurance to survive what left millions dead and millions more shattered in spirit is heroic enough. To gather the strength from that experience for a life devoted to caring for oth...

    Read More

  • Comparing Joseph Stalin and Fidel Castro

    1377 Words  | 3 Pages

    There have been many dictators through out history that have shaped the way we look at them now. Sometimes it’s the way that dictators came to power that people judge them on. Sometimes it’s how long they stayed in power, but it’s not just how long they stayed in power. It’s what they did to stay in power. These two men are some of the most infamous dictators for those reasons alone. These men are Joseph Stalin and Fidel Castro, and they played a huge part in shaping the way we look at dictators today.

    Read More

  • Rise Of Fascism And Totalitarianism

    1589 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 1922, Benito Mussolini held leadership in Italy, promising a proficient and militaristic nationalistic state. During his control as prime minister, he gained a large group of followers, banned the disparagement of government, and used extreme violence against his enemies within the parliament. According to Oppenheimer, Adolf Hitler idolized Mussolini’s rise and respected his tactics to gain power. Hitler was a violent leader who brought For example, “corporatism” largely contributed to later policies that we still practice today.

    Read More

  • The Three Major Philosophies Established During the 1900s

    1341 Words  | 3 Pages

    While discontent increased during the 1900s three major philosophies were established. The three major philosophies that were established were socialism, communism, and fascism. Socialism was never officially promoted, but the Bolsheviks, the elite group when Lenin was in power in Russia, thought socialism could be achieved by moderate reforms such as higher wages, increased suffrage, and social welfare. Communism was promoted by Lenin, his successor, and Stalin. Lenin developed the New Economic Policy, or NEP. Lenin just saw the New Economic Policy as a temporary retreat from communism. His successor put the Soviet Union back on the road to “pure” communism. Stalin developed Five-Year Plans while the Soviet Union developed a command economy, where the government made all basic economic decisions. A command economy is communist. Fascism was promoted by Mussolini and Hitler. In 1919 Mussolini organized discontent Italians into the Fascist Party. Mussolini quickly gained power, by 1925 he had taken the title II Duce, “The Leader.” Mussolini preserved capitalism and created his “corporate state,” where representatives of business, labor, government, and the Fascist party controlled industry, agriculture, and trade. Hitler made Germany become Europe’s second fascist state. Mussolini and Hitler were allies. Stalin relied on Lenin to further implement communism and the Soviet Union because they both shared the same goal, to generate worldwide revolution that Marx had predicted and Hitler relied on Mussolini to further implement fascism by copying Mussolini’s idea of preserving capitalism.

    Read More

  • Similarities And Differences Between Lenin And Stalin

    2265 Words  | 5 Pages

    Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin were similar in what they claimed to be, but in actuality they were very different people. Although Stalin claimed that he followed Leninism, the philosophy that Lenin developed from Marxism, he often distorted it to follow what he wanted to do. While Lenin wanted to make a unified society without classes, with production in the hands of the people, while Stalin wanted to make Russia into a modern industrial powerhouse by using the government to control production. Lenin accomplished his goals through violence, because he thought achieving Communist revolution was worth using violence, with a ‘The ends justify the means’ mentality. Stalin also used violence to accomplish his goals, however Stalin used much more violence than was often necessary to accomplish his goals. Stalin continued even once he was successful in accomplishing those goals, as he did not stop hurting people, but if anything it gave him more power to hurt people even more. But, at the end of the day, although Lenin ruled for only a very short time, he did raise the standard of living, though there maintained a large amount of hardship. Stalin, however, transformed the USSR from a peasantry to an industrialized nation in less than a decade, he did it on the backs of his millions of victims, who died because of his harsh policies and many purges.

    Read More

  • Influence On Benito Mussolini

    1437 Words  | 3 Pages

    Benito Amilcare Andrea Mussolini was born July 29th, 1883, to a revolutionary father and a Catholic mother. He was raised in Verano di Costa, a violent village near the coast of the Adriatic Sea, alongside his younger siblings, Arnaldo and Edvige. From an early age, he was influenced by his father’s revolutionary views. Alessandro Mussolini was an ardent socialist, often clashing with the local authorities.

    Read More

  • Stalin Vs. Hitler

    2651 Words  | 6 Pages

    These two men were very demanding in obtaining what they thought should be the rule of a nation by their own personal control. Stalin and Hitler were very close in the same way that they had an aggressive vigor to force a type of commanding dictatorship into their respective countries. Each had a special army that they put in high regard politically to where they were considered special police agents. These armies were under different orders, but their main objectives were to stop anyone who opposed, or were thought to be in opposition to the head of state. Also, both Stalin and Hitler had ideas to improve the education levels and economic prosperity of their own countries, each trying to put their own at the top of the world in industry and commerce. Although Hitler and Stalin were opposed to each other’s own strategies and political stance on being a world dominator, they were very similar in the way to which they fought for political power.

    Read More

  • Duck Soup: The Fascist Italy Under Mussolini

    541 Words  | 2 Pages

    Fascism was an ideology and government structure that ruled Italy from the 1920s to the 1940s after the end of World War II. There had been many analysis and discussions about the Fascist Italy under Mussolini. The lifestyles of people were largely affected by this extreme ideology. The film, Duck Soup, describes what it was like in Italy during Mussolini’s rule. I will be analyzing different aspects of fascism that were shown in the mythical city, Freedonia.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Fdr And Stalin

    612 Words  | 2 Pages

    Joseph Stalin was the dictator of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics from 1929-1953. Stalin rose to power as General Secretary of the Communist Party, becoming a Soviet dictator after

    Read More

  • Exploring the Similarities and Differences Between the Foreign Policies of Mussolini and Hitler

    527 Words  | 2 Pages

    Exploring the Similarities and Differences Between the Foreign Policies of Mussolini and Hitler Similarities - Both foreign policies geared to achieving great power status o Hitler: lebensraum, wanted to have living space for the expansion of the German race and control over other groups o Mussolini: wanted control over Mara nostrum, Abyssinia, …an empire - fascist states o had anti communist feelings; o both signed anti comintern pact 1937 against USSR o Spanish civil war against communism helping Franco secure power o Signed pact of steel in may 1939, a full military alliance - unhappy with status quo, wanted international prestige o national grievances on Versailles, people wanted to change Versailles o Hitler, product of WW1 who was angry at Versailles and wanted to see Germany achieve great power status o Mussolini; felt that Italy had been treated unfairly at Versailles and also waned to change the status quo o Because of this both built up armies, navies and air forces.. Italian air force to block out the sun + German luftwaffe… - both Hitler and Mussolini, used diplomacy and force as well as aggression to get what they wanted o Mussolini over Greece where it undermined the LofN, used force to take Abyssinia 1935 o Hitler used the threat of force to take Austria and diplomacy as well as force to take Czech and Saarland in 193… - by 1939 both had a common enemy; Britain and France - both were aggressive nationalists and glorified warw - both wanted empires; abysinnia and lebenstraum to distract from problems at home.. Differences - Hitler was more clear in his aims and ideals whereas Mussolini was more vague and opportunistic o Although Hitler did take advantage of opportunities such as Abyssinia crises to remilitarise Rhineland he was more structured in his aims for Lebensraum, unification of all Germans, building up the army and recovering lost territories § Illustrated by Hitler’s success after success ; Rhineland in 36,

    Read More

  • Joseph Stalin Research Paper

    592 Words  | 2 Pages

    Joseph Stalin became leader of the USSR after Lenin’s death in 1924. Lenin had a government of abstemious communist government. When Stalin came into government he moved to a radical communist society. He moved away from the somewhat capitalist/communist economy of Lenin time to “modernize” the USSR. He wanted to industrialize and modernize USSR. He had overworked his workers, his people were dying, and most of them in slave labor camps. In fact by doing this Stalin had hindered the USSR and put them even farther back in time.

    Read More

  • Mussolini Correlates To Propaganda

    142 Words  | 1 Pages

    Mussolini correlates to propaganda because of the way the was able too manipulate the people. Propaganda means to use media, radio, and many other things people use too listen or read. Mussolini used the media to publicize his policies and push is agenda. Hitler used education to teach the youth. The boys about how too preform military tasks while girl's would be groomed for a domestic life or nursing soilders and survivng air raids. Stalin as a political figure had accuried enough name an name from behaving rather modestly in public. Stalin as well used the media an had a tremendously amount of attention. These three dictators were very smart and knew how too get the people's attention with the use of propaganda. Stalin’s quote on the way

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Matalo And Stalin

    1866 Words  | 4 Pages

    They had similarities and differences as to how they were to proceed with their ideas for their country. Their worldviews were not so different than it would seem because they both had some similar plans in order to get to the same desired outcome, which was an industrialized country. As an apology to Mao, they “signed a treaty of mutual assistance and economic aid” (Wood, 8, 15). There were some trust issues between the two of them, but “Stalin trusted Mao more than he trusted Chiang” since there were ties between the CCP and the Soviets which ensured they would protect each other as the Chinese communists would be there to defend them (Sheng 182).

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Mussolini And Hitler

    1031 Words  | 3 Pages

    Both men are known for the change in history, and their change in the views of political parties. Mussolini came into power in 1922 and sought to make Fascism the only party in Italy, because he believed it was superior to all other parties. Both Mussolini and Hitler wanted to create a better economy for their countries, and had big plans to change the way their countries viewed things. Mussolini abolished democracy, and would not listen and shun any ideas or citizens who opposed his political views. Although the men were quite similar in the ways they set goals for their countries, Hitler was extreme in his plans for future Germany.

    Read More

More about Mussolini And Stalin Comparison

Open Document