Monroe Doctrine 1823

268 Words1 Page

The Monroe Doctrine of 1823 is the quintessential document that is in regards to affairs between the U.S. and South America. This document directly states that the U.S. will prevent European powers from forming additional colonies in South America. However in 1904, the Roosevelt Corollary was added to the Monroe Doctrine. This addition to the doctrine allowed for U.S. intervention in South American countries if something was threatening to other nations. Due to this section, one could justify multiple U.S. interventions in South America most of which were unsuccessful. One example of U.S. intervention that could be justified by the Monroe Doctrine is the extradition treaty of 1980 between the U.S. and Colombia. What this treaty did was to allow the extradition of Colombian criminals the the U.S.. In this specific instance the U.S. tried to indirectly police Colombia. Although the treaty successfully extradited criminals, it did not successfully resolve the source of issues in Colombia (Winn 504). Therefore, this treaty was unsuccessful. …show more content…

These U.S. backed coups are perfect models of the Monroe Doctrine. They occur when U.S. government witnesses a great amount of flaws within a foreign nation, and decides to inspire a change in government authority. This exact event can be seen in the 1973 coup to remove socialist president Allende (Winn 482). This resulted in the start of the Pinochet dictatorship in Chile. Because the coup caused the start of a dictatorship it is safe to say that once again the use of the Monroe Doctrine was a

Open Document