Model Animal Trial

2361 Words5 Pages

Research in the medical field has been an extremely large industry around the world for centuries. This research is used to find cures for diseases and illnesses which is necessary for the human population, but it costs millions if not billions of dollars annually and is a long process that can take up to ten years to finish one medical trial. All drugs and treatments have to pass a model organism trial before being tested on humans in a clinical trial due to ethics in medicine. Model organisms are usually mammals, reptiles, or amphibians. Due to their many pros as lab animals, rats and mice have become very popular in the medical testing industry. In his article “The Mouse Trap: The dangers of using one lab animal to study every disease”, …show more content…

The lab mice in his lab were over-eating and not exercising, which messed with his data. This was proven when a neurotransmitter called glutamate passed the model organism trial with success, but failed in humans (Engber). This was because his lab mice were chubby and unhealthy. When Mattson retried his glutamate-blocker trial on mice that were put on a strict diet, the trial failed just like the human trial (Engber). Due to this failed experiment, Mattson believes that other trials could have been invalid due to the health of the lab mice and those experiments should be re-examined (Engber). If it is known that the health of the mice messed up Mattson’s data and overall experiment then how are we to know that it hasn’t messed with more data. This could put human clinical trials in danger because the humans are going to react in a completely different matter than the mice did because their health, eating habits, and living arrangements weren’t in the correct conditions for an …show more content…

Mice can be bought for about five dollars, delivered in two days, and maintained for a nickel a day (Engber). Their genes can be altered, added, and deleted (Engber). The mice give similar results and data for scientists to compare; also, they are not very contagious. JoAnne Flynn, a microbiologist, said,” As for mice, "it's not that [they] aren't useful," she says, "or even that they're not the most useful possible system. Rather, it's that by focusing only on the mouse, we're running a grave risk." Although all of these are good points on why mice make good laboratory animals, the cons outweigh the pros. Mice and labs may still be useful in some studies due to these pros that they provide to the research world of science, but they shouldn’t be used in the every study. Flynn, a scientist that will be later discussed sees a place in research for multiple model organisms because different questions require different methods (Engber). Mice aren’t the answer for every

More about Model Animal Trial

Open Document