Millenial Stein The New Greatest Generation Summary

1526 Words4 Pages

Millennials VS. Joel Stein Argument Analysis Rough Draft According to the article, “The New Greatest Generation”, Millennials are described as a person reaching young adulthood around the year 2000. The author argues that Millennials are lazy, over-confident or narcissistic. For example, Kim Kardashian, a high profile television reality star and famous entrepreneur understands that she is devoid of having any real talent and she recognizes this fact; she knows that she doesn’t have talent but she’s very open with her life. In the learner’s opinion, Kim Kardashian West works extremely hard to achieve the things in life she has worked to attain. Therefore, the student tends to disagree whole heartedly with Stein’s views concerning our …show more content…

Narcissism is defined as the pursuit of gratification from vanity or egotistic admiration of one’s own attributes. Stein describes a narcissistic millennial as someone who’s constantly taking pictures and being on their phone and has a huge ego. Statistics say that narcissism can’t be cured, but treatment may help. Narcissism is said to be a chronic condition that can last for years or be lifelong. According to Joel Stein, in his article “The New Greatest Generation”, he states that “The problem is that when people try to boost self-esteem, they accidentally boost narcissism instead. The writer disagrees with the above statement, because one can boost someone’s self-esteem by simply giving a compliment or showing affection. The evidence that Joel Stein uses in his article is insufficient and he is only generalizing. Joel Stein gave an example saying “When they’re little it seems cute to tell them they’re special or a princess or a rock star or whatever their t-shirt says”. He feels when you reach a certain age group then it should be stop completely. I disagree with that, because in my opinion if one doesn’t motivate and show your child how great they are then chances are they won’t amount to anything. According to Stein’s article, he states that “The media give substance to, and thus intensify, narcissistic dreams of fame and glory, encourage common people to identify themselves with the stars and to hate the ‘herd’, and make it more and more difficult for them to accept the banality of everyday existence”. I feel this statement may have a point, but if you don’t give someone something to dream for or dream about then they won’t be able to see themselves with fame and glory. I do not agree with him saying it will be more and more difficult for them to accept everyday existence, because I read magazines and keep up with the Kardashians, but I know I work and go to

Open Document