Life comparison: North Vs. South
Way back in the early 1800s and late 1800s life in the North was completely different than life in the South. Southern states would have rows upon rows of beds of cotton and the North, every few miles is a textile mile. The economy in the North was completely different from the South. So is the society, it differs where you are at in the North and in the South. Both life styles may be different but are very similar in their own way. First of the economy for both North and South are very different. The North would get raw material from the South such as cotton and make in into string in textile mills along the banks of rivers. By that time they (Northerners) would have shipped the finished product to any place
…show more content…
Yes that was, and still is, true . They same were , in some aspects. They both had high class, middle class, and low class. In the North and South high class were to aristocratic but, in the South the wealthy people were called the “ the cottonocracy”. Middle class which were business owners and farmers who made money to by some expensive things. And then the lowest class would be the poor. In the south the poor were known as poor whites. But the one thing that made their societies remarkably different would be that in the South slavery was still around. Four million( more than ¼ of it’s population) were enslaved blacks. The surprising thing was the slaves had their own social class system. According to one of the former slaves in the documentary The Slave Narrative the slave said “ If you was a house slave, you’d be treated much betta’ than the field hands”. Maids, Butler, cook, child care takers, were at the top of the list in the slave society. The field hands were the lowest class. Slavery was a huge part of the society in the South , but in the North it was not. The Northern states had abolished
In “Antebellum Southern Exceptionalism: A New Look at an Old Question” James McPherson argues that the North and the South are two very different parts of the country in which have different ideologies, interests, and values. Mcpherson writes this to show the differences between the north and the south. He gives perspectives from other historians to show how the differently the differences were viewed. These differences included the north being more industrialized while the south was more agricultural. He gives evidence to how the differences between the north and south came together as the south produced tobacoo, rice, sugar and cotton, which was then sent to the north to be made into clothing or other fabrics. Mcpherson analyzes the differences
Because of the way that the New England and Chesapeake regions set up their colonies, they became entirely different societies. One was community based, while the other sought gold and wealth; in one region a poor person had the same opportunities are a wealthy person, while in another place they could not; and one came seeking religious freedom while the other came for gold.
The average slaveholder was a =capitalist continually on the move and trying to improve one’s self. Slaves were a commodity to be used, as were the slaveholders ' democratic politics and the expansion south and westward in the United States. The differences between North and South were less prominent than the similarities. The master-slave relationship made the South different. Southerners enslaved black people, while white Americans from North embraced anti-black racism. There was a constant tension characterized through slavery between slaves and masters. Slaves made the world of the masters and constantly threatened to unmake
The economies of the two regions are still very different. The North tends to be more pro-union and workers rights. Whereas the South, tend to have more right-to-work states, which embraces more of corporate rights stance.
Geographically, North and South were very different places. The pastures of New England were similar to those found in England, suitable for a variety of uses. Hot Southern prairie lands were perfect for cotton growing, a lucrative business at this time. Following the invention of Eli Whitney's Cotton Gin, the South became increasingly dependent on this crop, and an entire society grew out of it. The society was one of wealthy planters, who led a life similar to the landed gentry of England, controlling politics and society of the day. In the fields laboured Negro slaves, usually only a handful per plantation, though larger farms were occasionally seen. In addition, there lived poor whites, tenant farmers or smallholders, who eked out a living from the land. This contrasted sharply with Northern society, where industrialisation flourished, creating wealthy entrepreneurs and employing cheap immigrant labour. Given the localised nature of media, and difficulties of transport two cultures grew up in the same nation, remarkably different and often suspicious of one another.
The most important difference between the north and south was the issue of slavery. The South was primarily agricultural, and the southern economy was based upon the existence of large family farms known as plantations. The plantation economy relied on cheap labor in the form of slaves to produce tobacco and cotton. Farmers on the plantation did not do the work themselves; they needed slaves in order to make the largest amount of money possible. The North, however, was primarily industrial in nature. The North believed that all men should be able to work and support themselves and their families, regardless of color. They also felt that if a man were happy doing his job, then he would be more productive. Therefore, both he and the business would make more money.
Secondly, the demand for cotton grew tremendously as cotton became an important raw material for the then developing cotton industries in the North and Britain. The growing of cotton revived the Southern economy and the plantations spread across the south, and by 1850 the southern U.S produced more than 80% of cotton all over the world. As this cotton based economy of the south grew so did the slave labor to work in these large scale plantations since they were more labor-intensive...
In the history of slavery in the South was not unique and escort the founding of the United States, but escort with the hope to gradually decline in use. The abolished of slave trade from Africa was happening in early 1800s and North decadent the region of undergo began to have many changes, especially the increase in works for immigrant in the factories. The Southern States depend on a plantation economy based on crops, such as tobacco and cotton by using slave labors in the fields. In Northern States they were changed by giving works to immigrant workers in industrialized society. Well they are apart North and South, in the book by Shaara, she said “dissimilar men fighting for the union,” fighting against the rebel volunteers, “an army of remarkable unity, fighting for disunion.” Shaara talks about Conflict between the North and South in his novel few times, he talks about Fremantle and then the Englishman who is a companion the Longstreet. Shaara said in the book, “The North has those bloody cities and a thousand religions and the only aristocracy is the aristocracy of wealth. The Northerner doesn’t give a damn for tradition, or breeding, or the Old Country. He hates the Old Country…. In the South…by
Up north all blacks were free. The population of blacks in the north was about 1% in 1860 after the American Revolution. The blacks up north had minimal rights. The blacks could not vote, because of stipulations or they were just told that they could not vote by laws of their area. The New York Convention created one stipulation that was created to exclude blacks from voting in 1821; the law stated that blacks could not vote if they did not own property. Most blacks were having a tough time getting jobs in the south. So if a black person could not generate income how were they supposed to buy a home?
This economy, like many other agricultural economies, did not allow for a great deal of social mobility. The South also lacked factories, or much industry. However, this is not the main difference between the North and the South. Most troubling to Northerners was that the South used slaves as its main source of labor. Obviously, Northerners would be appalled by the barbarism associated with slavery, the beatings, the separation of families; but they were not.
The North and South were forming completely different economies, and therefore completely different geographies, from one another during the period of the Industrial Revolution and right before the Civil War. The North’s economy was based mainly upon industrialization from the formation of the American System, which was producing large quantities of goods in factories. The North was becoming much more urbanized due to factories being located in cities, near the major railroad systems for transportation of the goods, along with the movement of large groups of factory workers to the cities to be closer to their jobs. With the North’s increased rate of job opportunities, many different people of different ethnic groups and classes ended up working together. This ignited the demise of the North’s social order. The South was not as rapidly urbanizing as the North, and therefore social order was still in existence; the South’s economy was based upon the production of cotton after Eli Whitney’s invention of the cotton gin. Large cotton plantations’ production made up the bulk of America’s...
There are many differences between Antebellum America North and Antebellum America South. Some of the main differences consist of farming style, social classes, industry, transportation, cities, and view of slavery. The North’s farming style consisted of small farms that families would work on; crops and livestock were the main profit of these farms. It was unusual to see slaves working on these farms b...
In the south, cotton was becoming a huge success for the southern farmer. Cotton, being a very laborious crop, required the ownership of many slaves per plantation. Unlike the immigrants of the north, slaves were property. Slaves were also much less of a profit. When a slave became ill he could not simply be replaced, he needed to be cared for, after all, this was the plantation owners property. On the other hand in the north if a worker became to ill to work, there were several immigrants waiting for the job.
...lived, but that didn’t just change a little, it changed a LOT. In the south it was a custom to have a maid and people to do your farming for you, a stay in nanny, a cook, etc. All of that was “slave work” and since generation after generation was used to seeing slaves doing things for them, it stuck around and became a part of the culture. On the other hadn there was the north, which had become more industrialized and more self reliant and independent and, more educated and growing and moving forward kind of people, so to them slavery was far from being a part of culture it was just something horrible to anyone a part of their community. This huge divide between the two communities/societies is what led to the ultimate clash in all the US history, it was a huge deal and it itself was one of the biggest examples of sociological imbalance between a society/societies.
The social differences between the North and the South were extreme; the North was highly populated, industrial and far more forward thinking (Schultz, 2009). The South, however, remained sparsely populated, agricultural, and desired little, if any, change. The South’s lack of desire for change led the North to believe they were regressive and wanted to halt the progress of the nation. However, the South perceived the North as arrogant, pretentious and wanting to end the Southern way of life. Socially, the North was progressive and industrial, while the South was traditional and