Lack Of Communication Among Program Officers

887 Words2 Pages

The problem of communication among program’s officers can affect the development an stability of the organization. The lack of communication between officers or professional staff can be reflected in the creation of proposals or implementation of innovative ideas. In addition, the lack of communication allows of different perspectives for the management and use of budget, in which the program officer might believe that is a correct idea to make changes without consulting others. For instance, the program officer consider to make personnel changes without consulting or communicating with others. This can bring a negative impact by changing the personnel with extensive experience in one area and to make them work in another area that they might …show more content…

Program officers’ can make significant changes through the process, such as management or personnel changes. As a result, program officers’ should be able to maintain constant communication to others about the changes made on the departments to clear any misunderstanding that the other person might have. Moreover, changes in the finances are important since the entire organization depends on specific amounts provided by the program officers. Keeping informed the professional staff, grantees and personnel is essential to the development of the organization, for this reason, program officers should be able to maintain constant communication with others. Moreover, following the format required by the organization is a responsibility that program’s officer are in charge with. Making changes about the format of the proposal or budget are important modifications that should be communicated or approved by others. The collection of information or renewal of grants is a process that should be specifically reported in a document so it could make it easier for other employees or grantees in the procedure. According to Miner and Miner (2013), “Collecting information on an ongoing basis to document accomplishments will make it easier to develop a grant progress report (p. 247). The program officers are entitled to follow an impotent process that should be …show more content…

For instance, by communicating with past grantees, officers can obtain information about the type of format utilized by the other organization or about the likes and dislikes about the contributor. The second step is following the application guidelines which is essential for grant seekers to be aware of the rules, regulations and time frame required by the organization. Step three is maintaining interaction with proposal contacts is essential for the organization to continue having communication about the process or any additional question or concerns that the grant seeker can have. Moreover, the four step is “submit an excellent, not good ideas” the importance of completing all the information required by the contributor in a way that explains the purpose of the foundation in an innovative way is crucial to secure a grant. Step five is mention any methods that the proposed project will make an impact on people. By carefully explaining how the project will bring benefits to the lives of others will make donors to be aware on the importance of investing in a project that can make a significant change around the community. In addition, step six is “recognize that part of the program officer’s job is sometimes saying no”, by being aware that competition is continuing rising and that

More about Lack Of Communication Among Program Officers

Open Document