There are many ways used to communicate ideas and beliefs using methods such as paintings, sculpting, written compositions and the like. The of two drawings being compared are depictions of the October 1867 Treaty Signing at Medicine Lodge Creek, one done by John Taylor, a journalist hired by Leslie’s Illustrated Gazette and the other done by the Native American artist Howling Wolf, son of the Cheyenne chief Eagle Head. The signing of the peace treaty was between the Cheyenne, Arapaho, Kiowa, and Comanche peoples and the United States government. John Taylor’s illustration is based on sketches done at the scene and Howling Wolf’s depiction was done nearly a decade later while imprisoned at Fort Marion in St. Augustine, Florida. Both drawings, …show more content…
It is done in what looks to be charcoal and paper, emphasizing the foreground portion while gradually shading lighter the mid ground and above ground, producing atmospheric perspective. In contrast, Howling Wolf’s drawing is known as ledger art because the texture he used was ledger paper along with crayons. He utilized great color depicting the different tribes in attendance. There is asymmetrical balance in both drawings, where neither side reflects or mirrors the other. Wolf’s form is abstract and has no linear perspective; no clear focal point. Both artists depict the same overt content in distinct ways. Taylor draws many trees within and surrounding the gathering, in contrast, Wolf draws an almost even number of trees as dwellings, tipis, but he also includes a connecting …show more content…
In contrast, Howling Wolf’s drawing is an illustration of the story being told of the events. He portrays the diversities within the Native-American culture, different tribes and sects and also depicts the symbol of water and its need to co-exist with life, trees, humanity. The illustration of a Native-American with bound hands from behind, while surrounding Anglo-Americans trying to corral a horse, is very telling of the perception the Native-Americans have about the events that occurred. It allows the viewer to conclude that this event was not deemed by the Native-American peoples as a peaceful treaty but instead as take over. The horse being corralled and tied symbolizes the controlling of their freedoms and all that that
The dispute over whether Native American mascots should be used as a team symbol dates back to the 1970’s (Price 2). People differ on the basic issue, but there is a more important underlying principle. It is called freedom. Determining whether or not someone is harmed by a practice can reveal whether that practice can or should be morally justified. Wherein lies the truth about exercising the use of American Indian mascots? The reality is that they cannot be morally justified. The certainty is not ascertainable by way of any comparison to other similar phenomena. No such comparison can be made as none exits. Then, are not the only relevant voices those of the Indians themselves? If so, the truth regarding this imagery can only be discovered by conferring with the groups that are depicted. Only those portrayed should have a voice. Or at the very least, be heard louder and more clearly than those who are not mirrored in the representations.
The art work of Howling Wolf, Treaty signing at Medicine Creek Lodge and John Taylor, Treaty Signing at Medicine Creek Lodge as you can tell from the titles are both from the identical occasion. Both art works are from the same event but is portrayed by two cultures and their point of views (Sayre, Pg. 40). The drawer John Taylor was a journalist, and Howling Wolf was a Native American artist (Sayre, Pg. 40). These art works are concerning what occurred on
...d Native Americas in a negative light, such as Carl Wimer’s Abduction of Daniel Boone’s Daughter, George Caleb Bingham’s Concealed Enemy, and Horatio Greenough’s The Rescue. These two paintings and statue in particular should be included because they depict the views of people in that era. The view of Native Americans was that of savagery. In the painting by Wimer the woman is depicted a fair skinned maiden, due to the white dress who is being brutishly taken away. The statue by Greenough, which depicts a man protecting his family from a savage Native American, was outside of the United States Capital for nearly a hundred years before it was taken down. These views of indigenous people during the 19th century have lasting impacts on our country. It is our job to tell the real story of what happened to the Native Americans as victims of our view of manifest destiny.
In the introduction, Hämäläinen introduces how Plains Indians horse culture is so often romanticized in the image of the “mounted warrior,” and how this romanticized image is frequently juxtaposed with the hardships of disease, death, and destruction brought on by the Europeans. It is also mentioned that many historians depict Plains Indians equestrianism as a typical success story, usually because such a depiction is an appealing story to use in textbooks. However, Plains Indians equestrianism is far from a basic story of success. Plains equestrianism was a double-edged sword: it both helped tribes complete their quotidian tasks more efficiently, but also gave rise to social issues, weakened the customary political system, created problems between other tribes, and was detrimental to the environment.
In “An Indian Fathers Plea” written by Robert Lake , Wind- Wolf tries to become part of the American Culture when “he came home crying and said he wanted to have his haircut” (Lake 75- 79) just so he can fit in with his American peers. This text is a good example of how Wind- Wolf is trying to become a part of American Culture when really he is part of the Indian Culture. If Wind- Wolf would embrace being Indian he would be not just immersed in the American Culture by the time he graduates from that school,
The stress of this caused their once coveted friendship to wither and morph into an ill hatred. The English began a campaign of the demonization of Native Americans. The image of Native Americans was described in Red, White, & Black as friendly traders who shared a mutually beneficial relationship with one another. Evidently, a very different image started to appear when land disputes arose. The new illustration the English painted was that Native American people were “comparable to beasts” and “wild and savage people, that live like heards of deare in a forrest”. It was sudden change of heart between the two societies that supports Waterhouse’s claims of the changing relationship of the English and Native
There is a lot of repetition of the vertical lines of the forest in the background of the painting, these vertical lines draw the eye up into the clouds and the sky. These repeated vertical lines contrast harshly with a horizontal line that divides the canvas almost exactly in half. The background, upper portion of the canvas, is quite static and flat, whereas the foreground and middle ground of the painting have quite a lot of depth. This static effect is made up for in the immaculate amount of d...
At first glance, John Taylor and Howling Wolf’s visual representations of the treaty signing at Medicine Creek Lodge appear very different from one another. It is more than apparent that the two artists have very different interpretations of the same event. This paper will visually analyze both works of art by comparing and contrasting the compositional balance, medium, and use of color, as well as how the artists narrated their views using different visual elements.
The art work of Howling Wolf, Treaty signing at Medicine Creek Lodge and John Taylor, Treaty Signing at Medicine Creek Lodge as you can tell from the titles are both from the identical occasion. Both art works are from the same event but is portrayed by two cultures and their point of views (Sayre, Pg. 40). The drawer John Taylor was a journalist, and Howling Wolf was a Native American artist (Sayre, Pg. 40). These art works are concerning what occurred on October 1867 when Cheyenne, Arapaho, Comanche, Kiowa and the United States government signed a peace treaty (Sayre, Pg. 40). The treaty was signed at Medicine Lodge Creek on Arkansas River in Kansas (Sayre, Pg. 40). John Taylor’s art was created off of sketches that was completed shortly after the events (Sayre, Pg. 40). While Howling Wolf art work was created many years later, while Howling was in incarcerated (Sayre, Pg. 40). Wolf and Taylor images have similar art components while they also have different features.
In Green Grass Running water a narrator and trickster Coyote come together to oversee the two entwined plots: one based on the myth of establishment of the world, the other on the realistic events on a Native American reservation. The title of the novel itself “Green Grass Running Water” exemplifies King’s dependence on the readers capability to illustrate the signs from the mythical and realistic world. This metaphoric title indicates that the main themes are going to play a major role in the tricky defitionion of the real and mythic world, and righteousness and unjustifiable; which are somehow linked to trickster Coyote. King tries to show the reader the underlying message of traditional
Graeme Base uses lines of different thicknesses to make the drawing look more realistic. He also uses different tones of colours. An example would be from ‘Six Slithering Snakes Sliding Silently Southward’, the main snake’s body and tail contains at least four different colours. He also repeats the way the books are place in the library.
In Thomas King’s novel, The Inconvenient Indian, the story of North America’s history is discussed from his original viewpoint and perspective. In his first chapter, “Forgetting Columbus,” he voices his opinion about how he feel towards the way white people have told America’s history and portraying it as an adventurous tale of triumph, strength and freedom. King hunts down the evidence needed to reveal more facts on the controversial relationship between the whites and natives and how it has affected the culture of Americans. Mainly untangling the confusion between the idea of Native Americans being savages and whites constantly reigning in glory. He exposes the truth about how Native Americans were treated and how their actual stories were
Another example of how art represented in the Native North America exhibit is a painting by David Paul Bradley, a Chippewa artist, titled Greasy Grass Premonition #2. It depicts a scene from the Battle of Little Bighorn, but the tombstone explains that Native Americans know it as the Battle of Greasy Grass Creek. By providing that information for the audience, the MFA is allowing them a glimpse into the minds of Native Americans and their culture instead of presenting it as another example of Western bias.
In a land that was being reshaped by American expansion, stood two men, who would fight to save their lands and tribesmen. Cochise and Crazy Horse were among the fiercest and bravest Native Americans that have ever lived. These two men, while having clashing personalities, both showed strength and courage, in their pursuit to remain free.
Louise Erdrich’s short story “American horse” is a literary piece written by an author whose works emphasize the American experience for a multitude of different people from a plethora of various ethnic backgrounds. While Erdrich utilizes a full arsenal of literary elements to better convey this particular story to the reader, perhaps the two most prominent are theme and point of view. At first glance this story seems to portray the struggle of a mother who has her son ripped from her arms by government authorities; however, if the reader simply steps back to analyze the larger picture, the theme becomes clear. It is important to understand the backgrounds of both the protagonist and antagonists when analyzing theme of this short story. Albetrine, who is the short story’s protagonist, is a Native American woman who characterizes her son Buddy as “the best thing that has ever happened to me”. The antagonist, are westerners who work on behalf of the United States Government. Given this dynamic, the stage is set for a clash between the two forces. The struggle between these two can be viewed as a microcosm for what has occurred throughout history between Native Americans and Caucasians. With all this in mind, the reader can see that the theme of this piece is the battle of Native Americans to maintain their culture and way of life as their homeland is invaded by Caucasians. In addition to the theme, Erdrich’s usage of the third person limited point of view helps the reader understand the short story from several different perspectives while allowing the story to maintain the ambiguity and mysteriousness that was felt by many Natives Americans as they endured similar struggles. These two literary elements help set an underlying atmos...