Analysis Of 'Greasy Grass Premonition' By David Paul Bradley

578 Words2 Pages

Another example of how art represented in the Native North America exhibit is a painting by David Paul Bradley, a Chippewa artist, titled Greasy Grass Premonition #2. It depicts a scene from the Battle of Little Bighorn, but the tombstone explains that Native Americans know it as the Battle of Greasy Grass Creek. By providing that information for the audience, the MFA is allowing them a glimpse into the minds of Native Americans and their culture instead of presenting it as another example of Western bias.
The painting itself is an incredible combination of colors, texture, and style. The scene includes a line of general white warriors all dressed identically in the foreground. They wear military clothing appropriate for the timeline of the Great Sioux War of 1876, including white gloves, a brimmed hat, and an ascot. The military men are …show more content…

Their body proportions are realistic, and while not many details can be seen in their faces, one assumes it is proportionally based on the size of the facial hair and outline of the eyes. The naturalism lends the foreground of the painting a quality of "realness" especially when compared with the slightly more cartoonish depiction of the thought bubble hovering over the military men's heads. The figures depicted in the thought bubble are much less realistic to the military men. Some of the thought bubble characters are Native Americans, some are the enemy they fight. Many colors are used in contrast to the solemn blue of the military men. The Native Americans are portrayed with feathers in their hair, brandishing guns or spears while atop a horse. The white enemy wears blue uniforms similar to those of the men in the foreground of the

Open Document