Irina's Ethical Dilemma

831 Words2 Pages

#1 For a situation to be considered ethical dilemma, there are 3 conditions that should prevails. First, the clients must make a decision on the course of action that should be taken. However, uncomfortable situations that do not require choice are not considered ethical dilemma. The second condition is that several course of action should be available for the psychologist to choose from. The last condition that qualifies a situation an ethical dilemma is that no matter the course of action taken, some ethical principles will be compromised no matter (no perfect solution). Irina’s cases is an ethical dilemma because Dr. Mathew should choose either to discuss the sexual aspect of the assault with the daughter, or discuss assault in general. …show more content…

Thus, Dr. Mathew should get parental consent before discussing rape aspect of the assault. However, the law makes exceptions when a minor can be treated without parental consent. For example, in tines of emergency, a minor may be treated without parental consent. The law also allows minors to receive mental illness counselling without parental counselling. The HIPAA Privacy Rule gives clients rights in regard to the information obtained. However, The HIPAA permits for disclosure of information when deemed necessary. Dr. Mathew can choose to take the situation as an emergency. Dr. Mathew can also disclose the information to help the authority apprehend the person who raped Irina because he is a security threat to other minors. 3# According to APA Ethical Standards 2.01a b, and c, Dr. Mathew may evaluate. Evaluate the case, diagnose, or offer intervention services that may help her clients make a better decision. Dr. Mathew is obliged to provide reports and recommendations based on her finding either from the tests or interview or any other method used to obtain information. According to APA Ethical Standards 2.04, Dr. Mathew should only carry interventions or use assessment techniques that are reliable. She should understand the limits to the which judgments, diagnoses, or predictions can be

Open Document