Do the good things out weigh the bad in this situation. After analysing the case study and doing my research on ethical normative theories and morals in business, my opinion would be for John not to take the risk and do what is 'right' and wait until the deal goes through before signing off on the order. Yes the company may not make it through but John will still be able to find another job where as if he commits fraud things may be a lot worse for him in the long run. In the end he will have made the right decision not breaking the company’s laws and regulations.
Student Name: Danielle Lott Case Number: 3-5: A medication Error on the Oncology Unit: Who Has the Final Word? Step 1: Respond to the Sense That Something Is Wrong – Where in the case is the first indication that an ethical problem/issue is developing? Why? (250 words or less) There were many ethical issues within this case; the first indication of an ethical problem was the administration of an incorrect medication to the patient. The doctor, administration, and providers involved in the care of the patient must decide what is ethically moral when informing the patient.
It only takes one unethical choice to start a pattern of dishonesty; so one needs to be prepared to face any ethical situation with a plan of action. As the second level manager of the company, I would first find out the fact and the truth of the matter. Having established the fact, I would raise the issue with him and at this point, decision would be made on whether to report the purchasing manager’s conduct to my superior. It is possible that other companies by the vendors made similar offers, reporting the purchasing manager 's conduct to his company may help to reestablish fairness in the bidding process." Ethical conflicts like this leave the vendor with four primary options: engaging in
Nurses' Responsibility to Patients Requesting Assistance in Hastening Death. Oncology Nursing Forum, 34, 763-764. Pavlish, C. (2009). Oncology nurse's perceptions of nursing roles and professional attributes in pallaitive care. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 13, 404-413.
The traditionally moral logic, business ethicists more often than not expect that there is an ethical perspective from which ethicality of a choice can be assessed. It is comprehended that the ethical perspective can be translated in an unexpected way, contingent upon the particular background philosophy, yet they share the presumption that there is a target and unprejudiced line that individuals can use to measure contentions and achieve an answer. An example of this would be that some managers use different philosophical lenses when making a decision – reflecting
Moral choices vary on all people and how they see the moral issue. Most moral choices include the decision between both expense caused and profits gained. The business' morals will figure out whether the association will decide to profit in the "wrong" way or profit the "right" way. There are numerous elements in a business that impact morals, and it is essential that the wrong moral choices may cause the business to come up short and not maintain a benefit. It can additionally cause an awful nature's domain.
Reasons for MAE may include individual factors, organizational factors or system factors. This paper will discuss the root causes analysis of MAE and strategies to prevent them. Root Causes – Fishbone Diagram Communication Wieman TJ and Wieman EA (2004) demonstrates communication factors that result in MAE. They say that nurses’ failure to question unclear orders or pursue concerns because of intimidation by prescriber (physician or pharmacist) contributes to these errors. Illegible handwritten orders and ambiguous orders written in MARs or patient profiles further contribute to these medical errors.
Then again, when consideration is declined the doctor must guarantee the patient has the ability to comprehend his or her decision, and that the dangers, advantages, and options have been properly disclosed to the patient. Also, the choice to reject care should not be the aftereffect of wrong weight or compulsion. At the point, when confronted with a patient who declines mind, the doctor must evaluate and report the persistent choice making. It is not sufficient to just clarify the dangers of declining the care and request that the patient rehash these dangers or to sign a structure. A full limit appraisal is a complex undertaking, and it is illogical for crisis, doctors do this in an occupied ED with a patient who may be uncooperative.
If Owen knew about the decrease in value, he would accept the offer, but how will he find out if Luke doesn’t want to breach the information? In this case there is an issue between being honest to your company and being loyal to your brother. This case depicts an issue regarding Personal ethics, which are “principles that a person follows in order to uphold his/her morals,” (GENB4350 Online Lecture, Ethical Reasoning 1), because Luke might believe that it is right to tell his brother regardless if it is viewed as unethical. The reason this situation is an ethical issue is because Luke can betray the trust of his employers, while helping his brother make an easy decision, given the fact that he knows the value of his property will decline drastically in the near future. ETHICAL LENSES AND ANALYSIS In this meticulous case Luke can use two Ethical lenses that can help with his decision, the Utilitarianism and Universal Ethics (Categorical Imperative) approach.
After studying and analyzing the competitors offerings, the company can go ahead and decide which differences will create more utility for customers, and what are the disadvantages of competitors’ offerings. Then, the company can maximize the advantages of the product’s value. However, using this approach has a downfall which is called “value presumption,” this make the managers believe that the product has the desire differences that customers want, yet the features are unimportant or worthless for