Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The doctrine of informed consent
What is informed consent in healthcare
The doctrine of informed consent
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The doctrine of informed consent
The meaning of informed consent according to Corey (2013) states: “Informed consent involves the right of clients to be informed about their therapy and to make autonomous decisions pertaining to it” (p. 40). Informed consent is a basic collaborative agreement between the client and their therapist that sets the guidelines of what is to be expected from both client and therapist. Informed consent details the possibilities of what the risks are in their therapy process, as well as the benefits. I think that one of the ways that the counselor used the informed consent was by letting Stan know it was a process, and that they would be working on it together. It was Stan’s belief that the counselor would tell him what to do, and that he would just
I believe the school psychologist was not acting ethically. According to Standard I.1.1, "parent consent is required if the consultation about particular child or adolescent is likely to be extensive and ongoing and/or if school actions may result in a significant intrusion on student or family privacy beyond what might be expected in the course of ordinary school activities." Since the counseling group would be considered "extensive", the school psychologist needs a formal approval or denial of the services she intends to provide. The school psychologist also decided to send a letter explaining what the counseling session. While the letter does seem to provide extensive information on the sessions, the school psychologist has no way to know if the parents received the letter, or if the
Is informed consent always necessary for randomized, controlled trials? The following sentences are different scenarios that answer the question. Informed consent should not be waived unless the treatment is offered inside and outside the trial. Treatment should not involve more than minimal risk compared to alternatives. Genuine clinic must value the treatments the same. No reasonable person should have a preference for one treatment or another (Truog et al. 1999).
As stated by Collins (2007), the privacy and openness to discuss intimate issues can stimulate vulnerability with the client. Another ethical issue with this theory can be a growing dependence with the counselor. An additional ethical issue with this therapy is for the client to know his or her vulnerability regarding emotional or sexual needs when it comes to counseling a client (Corey, 2007). An additional ethical issue for the Individual Psychology therapy is that there may be some confusion as times to what is to happen in the counseling
According to ethical codes, a psychotherapist must sign a consent form confirming following all ethical considerations (APA, 2018). For example, in 2014, a psychologist called Shelly Kerr (director of the University Testing and Counseling Center), responded to the Oregon Board of Psychologist Examiners concerning an alleged rape of three basketball players. This was considered an ethical violation though there is no clear evidence Kerr violated ethics by releasing medical records to the Board.
Regardless of what issues a client presents in session a counselor should first identify if the client’s issue will cause an issue for them. For example, if a counselor is in recovery from alcoholism and a client needs to address their own addiction issues this may be too close to home for the counselor to handle in an unbiased and professional way. Therefore a counselor should always ask themselves, ‘will this be an issue for me’ when presented with a client issue. Secondarily as counselor should identify if they are competent in their abilities to address the client’s issue. Is the topic something the counselor is comfortable with, educated on, or has experience with? It is unprofessional, unethical, and potentially harmful to the client to agree to address issues that one is not competent to address. If a counselor finds that they are competent and the client’s issue does not cause an issue for the them than the counselor can proceed to identifying new go...
In the video, Whose Records, the client demonstrated frustration with her current counselor and made a request for her medical records in order to transfer to another counselor. During the conversation, the counselor remained calm and respectful to the client regardless of the clients’ disrespectful approach. I do not agree with the challenge approach made by the counselor regarding the client seeing a different counselor every three to four weeks. That seemed to increase the level of tension on behalf of the client. I feel a better approach would have been to allow the client to express her concerns regarding her current treatment. After which, the counselor could explain the process of obtaining her medical records along with requesting the client to sign the appropriate release of information to acquire her records.
Ethically and therapeutically building a relationship with Joe is important. All consents should be explained prior to signing, confidentiality should be addressed, and a warm, empathetic, and compassionate environment should be provided. All records are to be kept in an orderly fashion and moral and ethical values should be followed (American Psychological Association (APA), 2010). This is essential to initiating treatment with any client, especially one that has major depression with suicidal ideations; moreover, this relationship should be nourished with trust, honesty, as well as maintains the ethical and moral requirements of the American Psychological Association. This professionalism and trust will be vital to a working relationship with honesty from Joe, as well as his willingness to be honest, and open himself up to another individual, especially a
...r an affirmative consent standard, the law presumes that a woman does not grant consent unless she is asked. The responsibility will be on the male to demonstrate such consent if the woman, in her complaint, alleges no such consent was given; therefore, it will be his story of the events of the evening that is under examination by the court, rather than that of the woman. What affirmative consent represents, then, is a shift in the way society, and in particular the courts, look at the process of consenting to sexual intercourse. Affirmative consent recommends that sex should be viewed as an act that should be entered into willingly by both parties and that the opinion of both parties is equally valid in the eyes of the legal system. Affirmative consent marks a model of sexual interaction where both participants take responsibilities for their desires and actions.
While going through the informed consent, the therapist has the responsibility to provide the necessary understanding for clients about how therapy would work. Some clients are new to therapy, so the therapist has to educate them about the therapeutic process. For client who had previous therapeutic experience, the therapist has to educate them about how therapy would be similar and/or different from previous therapy. When verbally addressing with the clients the informed consent, it is important to go over various elements of the consent form.
In conclusion, obtaining informed consent is a vital part of respect for the patient and safeguarding of self-determination. The consent to participate in research or treatment should be informed, comprehensible, and free of coercion. There is not a clear black and white answer because no matter what is done to assure informed consent there is always a moment of doubt on the end of the patient as to whether what is going to take place is fully understood and their true wishes honored.
I think I went through a similar debate as you when trying to answer this question. On the one hand, like you, I read a lot of research that described the opt-out system as having a higher success rate of organ donations. Although, on the other hand, I think it is important for people to have a choice as to what happens to their body. I do recognize that you are still able to opt-out under the opt-out approach, but I think the more ethical system would be one in which you must choose to participate, not choose to not participate. With that being said, I agree that I too am not completely opposed to the opt-out approach. It's just that I too usually lean more towards the pro-choice side. The fact that, in the opt-out system,
Kuther (2017) defined informed consent as a clients’ “informed, rational and voluntary agreement to participate. Informed consent is important because it shows that clients are aware of what is happening and that clients are at services on their own accord. Without obtaining informed consent, clinical psychologists cannot treat clients or perform research on participants. While clinical psychologists need informed consent to treat and perform research on clients, they do not necessarily need informed consent from the person whom they are treating. Informed consent must obtain from the parents of minors because minors do not have fully developed brain and cognitive abilities (Kuther, 2017). Kalat (2016) states that adolescents do not have a
This organization was founded in 1989 to assist individuals in this association to support the mission of AMHCA; including students and educators. The mission of this organization states “Mental health counselors value objectivity and integrity in their commitment to understanding human behavior, and they maintain the highest standards in providing mental health counseling services” (AMHCA, 2015). It’s the counselor’s responsibility to disclose information and focus the session on the client. Information is also provided regarding client rights and contact information for the state counseling licensure authority. If written or given consent, you can communicate personal information as dictated by the state of law to emergency professionals or someone involved in the counseling
“The engineering of consent”, second episode of the BBC series “The century of the self”, is focused on the topic of mass society’s control seen from the point of view of Anna Freud. The dilemma is still between “control and trust”. The main argument offered is that people are driven by inner irrational forces. Therefore, for an healthy democracy, those instincts have to be controlled and eventually repressed. Anna Freud thought that the way to govern mass society was to teach people how to repress the “human barbarism”, that threatened democracy. Her main strategy is that of conformism, of linking the desires of the individual to the desires of society. The documentary provides also Herbert Marcuse’s point of view. Marcuse considered the true evil to be in society itself and its control of the unconscious. In his opinion,
In this experience, I saw a client ask the counselor what they thought they should do in a situation where both choices were not desirable. The counselor did not give their opinion and it seemed like the client left more frustrated and confused than when he had come in. I empathized with him and frankly was a bit annoyed with the counselor for not giving him advice or her opinion. After the session, the counselor had mentioned that it was necessary for the client to make the decision by himself. Although I could appreciate this, I was not completely satisfied with this