Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
British imperialist policies in india
British imperialist policies in india
British imperialist policies in india
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: British imperialist policies in india
The first thought that comes to mind when India is mentioned is its overwhelming population. India is such a big body of land and is home to over one billion residents. Then one also realizes that it is considered a third world country. This paper will attempt to describe how a nation with so much growth potential could not catch up to the western world in terms of national wealth and prosperity. The primary reasons that India is lagging in terms of wealth compared to first world countries include the trade/business policies created by the British, the institution of the caste system of India, and the phenomenon known as brain drain. The British imperialism and the caste system have been in place for a while now, and they are both factors that led to India’s brain drain problem.
Since the eighteenth century, the British began coming into India on business ventures, seeking any opportunity they could to make money. This influx of British foreigners continued and started to influence India as a whole. This persisted for some time and eventually led to India being declared a colony of Britain. This period is known as the British Raj, and took place starting in 1858 and extended until 1947 (Muczyk, Holt pg. 278). While the British Raj was present in India, they were the ones that controlled all the inflows and outflows of trade.
Britain had been one of India’s main trading partners, along with China. The main commodities that these countries traded amongst each other were textiles, tea, and opium. Opium was India’s greatest export by the middle of the nineteenth century (Maddison pg. 16). Although Britain had taken over India, they were two vastly different countries. Britain had experienced the European Revolution and ...
... middle of paper ...
...ooks,
(http://www.vedpuriswar.org/book_review/India%20Unbound.pdf)
Friedman, M. (1963). Indian economic planning. First Draft,
(http://www.ccsindia.org/ccsindia/pdf/friedmanindia/03%20Indian%20Economic%20Planning%20-%20Milton%20Friedman.pdf)
Kohli , A. (2001). The success of india's democracy.Cambridge University Press,
(http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam031/00067439.pdf)
Maddison, A. (1971). The economic and social impact of colonial rule in india. Class Structure and Economic Growth: India & Pakistan since the Moghul
(http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/articles/moghul_3.pdf)
Saxenian, A. (2005). From brain drain to brain circulation: transnational communities and regional upgrading in india and china. Studies in Comparative International Development,, 40(20), 35-61
(http://www.abdn.ac.uk/sociology/notes07/Level5/SO5512/Week%2010%20(4).pdf)
Though the world economy as a whole has grown in recent years, a factor that is not taken into account is that the number “of the poor in the world has increased by 100 million” (Roy 3). In other words, the gap between rich and poor is widening. For India, this has startling implications. Though it is a nation that is developing in many ways, it also is a nation blessed with over one billion citizens, a population tally that continues to grow at a rapid rate. This population increase will greatly tax resources, which can create a setback in the development process. The tragedy, of course, is that the world is full of resources and wealth. In fact, Roy quotes a statistic showing that corporations, and not even just countries, represent 51 of the 100 largest economies in the world (Roy 3). For a country struggling to develop, such information is disheartening. However, there is also a more nefarious consequence of the growing disparity between rich and poor, and power and money being concentrated in the hands of multinational corporations: war is propagated in the name of resource acquisition, and corruption can reign as multinationals seek confederates in developing countries that will help companies drive through their plans, resulting in not only environmental destruction but also the subversion of democracy (Roy 3).
Marshall, Peter. "The British Presence in India in the 18th Century." http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/empire_seapower/east_india_01.shtml (accessed June 8, 2014).
James, Lawrence. Raj: The Making and Unmaking of British India. New York: St. Martin's, 1998. Print.
The 190 years of Imperialism in India by the British were over all a negative experience for the country. However, a few good things did come out of imperialism like transportation. Britain became selfish and inconsiderate towards the Indian people and only did what helped their country and their economy. Because of the imperialism India’s people became hostile towards each other and later, after being freed from British rule, broke out into a civil war.
" India was where the riches of the world came from, the jewel in the crown of the British Empire. The British needed to dispel the threat of other Europeans in Africa to maintain control of India, and they did so efficiently. They quickly gained control of both the major sea routes to India and then turned their eyes to the rest of the continent. Whether the British were trying to foster public support or prevent another nation from becoming a threat, all British actions in Africa were directly or indirectly linked to India. The British were motivated by their desire to become powerful, and they skillfully combined enterprise and conquest to create a globe spanning empire centered around the wealth of India.
Sara Rose begins her story For All the Tea in China by saying, “There was a time when maps of the world were redrawn in the name of plants, when two empires, Britain and China, went to war over two flowers: the poppy and the camellia.”(Prologue). The purpose of this book is to explain the growing tensions between Britain and China and how that tension then shaped the world. Sarah Rose stresses the importance of the opium and tea trade to the British Empire in this story. When the Chinese began the process to stop the sale of the opium to its citizens and closed the port of Canton to the India Tea Company, the British reacted with anger. They then decided it might would be a smart business move to create a source
The British considered Indian civilization to be inferior and implemented their western ways, overriding ancient Indian customs. Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that British imperialism in India resulted in both positive as well as negative reforms in political, economic and social aspects of its new colony. To begin with, one can observe that the British colonizers did indeed improve Indian civilization by developing means of communication and transport. They built a great number of bridges, over 40,000 miles of railway and paving an astounding 70,000 miles of road (Doc. 4. The adage of the adage.
Iyer , L, 2004, The Long-term Impact of Colonial Rule: Evidence from India. [Online] available at [accessed on 12 November 2010]
Throughout the years Britain had always tried to use the Chinese markets to their advantage. This is what was seen as the biggest and only cause towards starting the First Opium War. Although the British were gaining a profit from selling their own goods to Chinese consumers, they were not making enough to counter the massive amount of spending they were doing on Chines...
India, the second highest populated country in the world after China, with 1.27 billion people currently recorded to be living there and equates for 17.31% (India Online Pages 2014) of the world's population, but is still considered a developing country due to it’s poverty and illiteracy rates. As these nations continue to grow at rates that are too fast for resources to remain sustainable, the government’s in these areas wi...
2 Stein, Burton (2001), A History of India, New Delhi and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. xiv, 432,
...an HDI of 0.36. These discrepancies in levels of development have led to an exodus of people, from less developed areas to the areas that have been benefitted by development. This situation seems to depict that predicted by the Dependency theory in which the developed countries progressed due to the exploitation of peripheral nations; the same seems to be happening in India. The states that are wealthier are exploiting the poorer states. It would be difficult to imagine India having the economic status that it now has, if it was not for the terrible working conditions and wages at which the Indians are willing to work and the massive work force available in the country. Now that India has seen economic growth the government should start taking care of its citizens by implementing policies that protect the labor rights of the workforce.
Gender and race discrimination are major causes which have led to income inequality in these countries. India has caste system, which is s...
With major control over India, the British used a combination of firepower & guile to consolidate their power over the country by expanding from their base areas along the coast into the interior (Duiker 31). Some territories were also taken over the privately run East India Company, which at the time was given authority to administer Asian territories under British occupation, while others were ruled by local maharajas (Duiker 31). British governance brought order and stability to a society that had recently been wrecked by the wars from the different empires (Duiker 31).
in relation to development. Development is explained by the Oxford Dictionary as the process of developing or developed in a specified state of growth or advancement. Underdeveloped as according to the Oxford Dictionary is ‘not fully developed or not advanced economically’ which is meant for a country or a region. We can certainly see the difference between underdeveloped and developed where the changing situation emerges from the economic point of view. To be more specific, worlds within world were created i.e. the nomenclature of First World and Third World came into picture. The First World is said to be the industrialised, capitalist countries of Western Europe, North America, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand who are developed (as explained in the definition). The Third World includes the developing countries of- Asia, Africa and Latin America who are still in the mode of developing. Normally we understand the situation of underdevelopment is because the third world was under the colonies or the colonial rule for a certain period of time and lags behind the first world in every aspects like- social, economical, political, technological advancements which are yet to be seen in the third world fully like the first world. In this paper we will talk about various theorists from - Karl Marx (capitalism and class conflict), Kay and Amin (merchant capitalism, colonialism and neo-colonialism), Vladimir Lenin (imperialism), Andre Gunder Frank (third world dependency), Lipton (urban bias) and dependency theory. Here in this paper we will try to explain and understand the relevance of the various underdevelopment theories and different attributes related to it terms of the Indian Context.