Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of cooperative learning
Impact of cooperative learning
The importance of cooperative learning methods in the classroom
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of cooperative learning
Breanna Martin
Raybuck-Bonilla
English 12
10 April 2014
Maintaining Ability Grouping in Schools
By trying to teach children of varying abilities in one classroom, the American society is undermining and under-developing some of its brightest young people. One of the oldest and most controversial forms of education is ability grouping or “tracking” of students. It has always been a topic of debate among academic researchers and child psychologists whether students should be differentiated and grouped according to their academic skills and abilities. Students should be integrated according to their academic skills and abilities because the concept of ability grouping can have an increase on pace, provide individual attention and boost confidence.
To begin with, by integrating students according to their strengths, students are not forced to wait or rush and the pace of a classroom setting or an individual’s learning process can increase. When students are grouped together based on their skill level, the pressure is lessened of when or how fast the topic must be covered. The students that grasp the concept are able to move on when they have reached the appropriate understanding. Likewise, students with learning styles where they take longer to understand concepts are not falling behind because the class needs to move on; they simply take the time they need to learn and then progress at the appropriate time. In modern day classrooms, there are thirty to forty some-odd students, who all have a slightly different, if not completely different, learning style than another and one teacher to teach each individual. In most cases, the teacher wants and tries to help the students who are struggling, but in the process, they end up “leaving ...
... middle of paper ...
...nly achieving up to the teacher’s expectations. If students are placed in a grouping where learning is done at a slower pace and concepts are understood in a longer period of time, then some students may work to that level even though they are capable of achieving more. There is the possibility of pigeon-holding students into how “smart” or “intelligent” they are and some may only work to the level they are grouped in. Even if they did not do so consciously, teachers may treat students in the different groups as superior of inferior based on their groupings, leading to the perception by the students that they are not talented enough to do as well as their peers in other groups. If your school is considering the possibility of using ability grouping as an educational tool, help them to consider the above advantages and disadvantages before making any policy decisions.
...ting them choose their own groups to be in during class, as offering multiple ways to complete projects, different assigned reading topics, and etc. The student can only get out of the class as much as they put in. Even though the students may wish the teachers would give less homework or let them read Sports Illustrated in class, there is a fine line between academic learning that incorporates “street smarts” and academic learning that lacks on the academic part. Teachers must insure their students are learning the required material and that they are not taking detours from learning about topics and ideas that students need to be successful after college.
Hopkins, G. (2003). Is ability grouping the way to go---or should it go away? Retrieved April 10, 2004, from http://www.education-world.com/a_admin/admin009.shtml
...ualized plan due to time constraints, it is reasonable to treat each student as they do have an individualized education. Teachers should know their students well enough to individualize the classroom activities so all students have strengths in each lesson. Through collaborative efforts, teachers can gain knowledge about the students and new ways to teach according to different learning styles. Working together, each student can receive an individualized education where their full potential is used.
The idea behind ability grouping, or tracking, is that “many school practitioners assume that grouping by ability promotes student’s achievement because, it is argued, all students learn best when grouped with students of similar capabilities or levels of achievement.”(Perceptions) There are many arguments for either side, thus begging the question “is ability grouping an efficient way to handle differences in student abilities?”(Education World) Contrary to today’s popular opinion, which naturally runs against the current educational structure of our schools, I believe ability tracking is an effective and worthwhile means of educating our youth, for a variety of reasons. Ability tracking promotes academic achievement, quality instruction, and is a means of student motivation. Unfortunately, those who do not participate willingly in the tracking program can easily become lost or distraught with the system. This having been said, I don’t deny the fact that many improvements can be made to the existing system as a means of expanding and providing opportunities to all those who desire success.
The issue of ability grouping has caused controversy in the education community. Some education scholars say that ability grouping. A study by Dallas Independent School District found that ability grouping not only helped the top groups of students, but the entire spectrum of students learned more than mixed-ability classrooms (Garelick 2). This is not a practice that benefits only the white, rich, or intelligent, but a practice that helps the entire student body. Joann DiGennaro reminded us that mixed ability groups hurt almost everyone involved because the top students are bored and unchallenged and the bottom students are left behind (DiGennaro 2). Ability grouping insures that every student in every school is challenged yet prepared, and prevents anyone from being left behind or ahead. It is the duty of the education to meet the needs of every student, and ability grouping is a medium to insure that the goal is met.
Homogeneous tracking has not yet shown any positive long term effects. When one middle school in 1992 mixed students of high achieving and average achieving ability, the high achieving students ?suffered no decrease in computation or problem-solving achievement? (Mills 2). The students also scored higher in concepts than their peers from years prior (Mills 2). Robert E. Slavin, author of ?Achievement Effect of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Best Evidence Synthesis?, argues that since homogeneous tracking has no long term effects on the higher achieving students, there is no more reason to keep the practice (Sl...
It is important to understand the many different methods of educating gifted and talented students. Most people, whether as teachers, students, or parents, will at some point be faced with the many options of educating the gifted and talented. In the United States today, 3-5 percent of students are considered gifted. Defining whether or not a student is gifted can be quite difficult, but many would agree that gifted students “are able to learn material rapidly and understand concepts deeply” (Lynch, 1999). Within this paper I will discuss the process of identifying gifted and talented students and the different methods of educating them including tracking, grade advancement, and cooperative learning. Of these three methods I believe the most effective method used to teach gifted and talented students is tracking.
When a school or teacher groups students “based on their ability or achievement,” the school is practicing between-class ability grouping (Santrock 125). In many cases, between-class ability grouping is used in a high school setting as a way to group students with similar goals and skills. On the surface, between-class ability grouping appears that it benefits all students because it allows teachers to better teach students in a more focused manner. However, researchers have determined that this form of grouping harms those that are in a lower ability group (125). Recently, when I was helping out at a lower achieving high school this form of grouping was clearly evident. Students were clearly divided into classrooms based on their abilities. Each classroom was going over the same material but each classroom teacher was teaching the material differently to meet the needs of that group of students. The history classroom that was deemed an advanced placement class worked a lot smoother and the students had a good understanding of the subject as well as appropriate behavior. However, the “average” history
Meeting the needs of academic diverse learners is the responsibility of their instructor. These diverse learners may include students who are one or more grade levels below classmates and the gifted student who is that much above. How can educators meet the needs of these students when their learning abilities are found at opposite ends of the instructional spectrum? The answer is planning successful lessons involving engaging activities, a variety of texts, technology implementation, and flexible grouping. The following is a lesson I implemented covering these key components.
Research on the social and cognitive effects of grouping students in mixed-abilities versus same-abilities classrooms is gaining increasing interest among practitioners and researchers. In hopes of attaining higher scores, many schools have adopted homogeneous ability grouping. Unlike them, our school has adopted the policy of mixed ability classes where students of different academic abilities study together in the same class. Indeed, there is a lot of research in favor of heterogeneous ability grouping, but is this beneficial to us?
How do teachers enable all students of varying abilities to reach the same goals and standards established for their grade level? Instruction begins with a concept of treating each student as a unique learner whose strengths and weaknesses ha...
First, it reduces patterns of discrimination and gives relative equal opportunity to students regardless of race, socioeconomic standing, etc. and creating a different classroom environment. This, in my humble opinion, makes peers be able to be more cohesive and work together both in and out of the classroom regardless of any preconceived prejudicial thoughts or actions. Second, the concept of “ability grouping”, from my understanding, is similar to what I experienced in my time as a student in middle and high school; the practice of placing students on certain levels based on ability in a particular subject. Personally, math was not a strong suit, however English and reading comprehension was, thus the staggering of placement in those particular areas. One area of an individual’s intelligence should not automatically place them in a low-level track for all subjects, and it seems as though that train of thought (pun intended) is gaining momentum as it rightfully
Another factor that could lessen the greatness of ability grouping is determining what strategies to use when grouping these children. Testing the children on the subject would be a great way to find out what learning level they are on, but not all students test scores will be precisely accurate of what education level they are actually on. Putting each student into the proper group is virtually impossible but with the right technique and enough thought each child can be put in the right group, giving them the chance to broaden their learning
There are several ways in which a teacher can accommodate every learning style by doing simple things in the classroom. Examples of this would be a certain seating arrangement or even just changing all the time to reach each students style. Knowing and learning styles might be one of the most important things to learn from your students at the beginning of each school year. There are several tests out there that can help with this, but know each style is also important. Knowing your own learning intelligence as a teacher will also help you and is important. This allows you to know in which way you will best be able to absorb information that is important in our teaching. Multiple intelligences are a vital part of any teacher’s lesson plans and are especially necessary in the ever-changing diversities of the schools. Learning styles will bring out the strengths and weaknesses.
When a lower tracked student is placed in the low-ability class, the placement can destroy a child’s confidence as well as promote inequality (Enns 2015). As the lower tracked education quality is much lower than a higher tracked classroom, there is a disadvantage for students who actually want to learn. There is not much encouragement for the lower-ability students because expectations are significantly reduced (Enns 2015). Despite being in a high-ability class, a child may feel pressure because he or she has to compete with other kids with the same intellect. When a child feels the need to compete, it could harm his or hers confidence level as well (Holloway 2003). A homogenous approach creates inequality within society because tracking is based off on an individual’s social background. Therefore, tracking will create a divide between the minority and majority groups. The majority dominant class has the upper-class advantage meaning that their children are most likely to be in the high intelligent class due to the extracurricular within their lives. While the minority is placed in the lower tracked class, they are given the lower quality education that they do not deserve (Enns 2015). Nevertheless, according to Paton (2012), the mixed approach was thought to have a its disadvantage because it might put high-ability children at a disadvantage. Parents were scared that the lower-ability children would hold their high-ability children back academically (Paton 2012). Having said that, the parents are wrong, as it is not another child’s fault in why their children are not pushed to their full potential. It is the teacher’s responsibility to provide more challenging lessons for the more intelligent children. The teachers are the ones who should push their students to their full potential (Paton