Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of international organisations and human rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of international organisations and human rights
Introduction
This essay aims to look at how international multilateral treaties shape the Singapore State discourse on protecting the rights for migrant workers, specifically Foreign Domestic Workers (FDW) from a perspective of maintaining state sovereignty in controlling migrant flows to a more humanitarian view of FDWs as a vulnerable group to exploitation and trafficking. I would conclude that recently, the international community succeeds in pressurising Singapore State to start making some efforts to ensure FDW righFramework
Finnermore (1996) argued that UN create norms and legitimised actors to engage in multilateralism for humanitarian intervention. I borrowed his framework of analysing how international community as a collective actor, Singapore State as the state actor, share different norms and values, have differing interests. Hence, they behave and impact FDW rights differently.
Significance of this essay to the concept of Global Governance
Koser argued that states often try to solve migration issues on a "unilateral approach" that is unproductive. International consensus on migrant workers rights are difficult to achieve as many states refuse to ratify conventions as the conventions "contradicts or adds no value to existing national migration laws." (Koser, 2010, pp. 301--315) Hollifield built upon Ruggie's argument (Ruggie, 2002 cited in Hollifield, 2000) that multilateralism will only work wh...
... middle of paper ...
...&mtdsg_no=IV-13&chapter=4&lang=en [Accessed: 8 Apr 2014].
UN. 1948. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. [online] Available at: http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/ [Accessed: 8 Apr 2014].
Unodc.org. 2014. Signatories to the CTOC Trafficking Protocol. [online] Available at: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/CTOC/countrylist-traffickingprotocol.html [Accessed: 8 Apr 2014].
Varia, N. 2005. Singapore. New York, NY: Human Rights Watch.
Www2.ohchr.org. 1990. International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families. [online] Available at: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cmw/cmw.htm [Accessed: 8 Apr 2014].
Yeoh, B. S., Huang, S. and Gonzalez III, J. 1999. Migrant female domestic workers: debating the economic, social and political impacts in Singapore. International Migration Review, pp. 114--136.
In order to solve this problem, the ICC needs to adopt a separate provision for trafficking of humans and adopt one of the definitions of human trafficking already in use via the TVPS or the Palermo Protocol. An ascertainable and broad definition regarding human trafficking will help bring such atrocities before the ICC and render actual meaning to the Rome Statute’s enslavement provision.
Foreign policy and Immigration since 1945”. Threatened Peoples, Threatened Borders: World Migration Policy. Eds. Michael Teitelbaum and Myron Weiner. New York: Columbia University, 1995. p.123-124.
Though immigration is not a new phenomenon in the world’s history, it has been notice that now days immigration has increased more than ever. This is mainly caused because of better ways of communication and transportation, which it makes it possible to people to move and enter other countries. However there are many types of immigrations such as economical, retirement immigrants or even ‘natural disasters’ immigrants. People sometimes seek a new life to save themselves from poverty and misery, thus they decide to enjoy the benefits of another country. Still there are other immigrants who are forced to leave their countries because of wars or even natural disasters, such as the tsunami in Japan 2011. Some philosophers consider closed borders to restrict people freedom of movement and that global justice is been violated. On the other hand Miller and other philosophers argued that immigration causes more disadvantages than advantages into the country they enter. Also they agree that states have a moral right to limit immigrations in order to prevent any changes in their culture, as immigration affects several things, even if this means that they will violate human rights. Another concern for the states is the welfare state where sometimes it may be limited and countries cannot afford any immigrants. However, is it right to oppose people rights of freedom, or is it correct for states to limit immigration?
Mohajerin, S. K. (2006). Human trafficking: Modern day slavery in the 21st century. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 12(3), 125-132.
From the above it is quite evident that what the US Government has been doing through its application of immigration laws is the exclusion of specific races from its borders. Despite the reasons that may be given for these actions, it is clear that the author raises valid points regarding the disturbing similarity between immigration laws and institutionalized racism (Ngai, 78).
Most of the human trafficking in the world takes the form of forced labor, according to the International Labor Organization estimate on forced labor. Also known as involuntary worker, forced labor may result when employers take advantage...
Migration has been a major part of human living and also animals, people migrate for various reasons such as seeking better lives, family, job opportunity, availability of social amenities etc. immigration policies were put in place to monitor and decide who immigrate to a country and these policies have been present since 1906, and these polices have had different reasons for their enactment and these reasons change as time and era changes (Baglay, 2014). The early policies were racially based restriction, economic growth, multiculturalism, restriction on refugee and economic immigration (Baglay, 2014). The Communitarian approach used by Michael Walzer to explain immigration policy is similar to Canadian immigration policy. This paper seeks to discuss and analyze the articles by Joseph Carens and Michael Walzer, explaining the different perspectives of explaining immigration policies. The paper would summarize and contrast the author’s main arguments. It would take a stand on which argument is more persuasive in explaining immigration policy and give reason for this position. It would also use other articles to support or refute each argument made by Joseph Carens and Michael Walzer. Lastly this paper would explain and come to a conclusion of if any of these arguments apply to Canadian immigration policy and give examples of these similarities. Carens and Walzer had very different view on immigration and open border, Carens used the Liberal perspective of explaining open border.
By the end one should be able to understand why child labor is in violation of human rights and should not be accepted and what is currently being done to put an end to it. Many people want to put an end to this plight, but they feel overwhelmed by the complications and the enormity of it that it becomes difficult to find a the right way to tackle it. There have been many implications that have succeeded in aiding this predicament and enabled progress to be ma...
...m as an emergency political problem and citizens should become aware of the negatives that have been an inhumane result of racial profiling and anti-immigration laws in recent years. It is also necessary for the nation to become informed and concerned on the positives of immigration reform. The necessary facets to begin with,which can be backed by sociological and statistical data, include the application of a pathway to citizenship for nearly 12 million undocumented immigrants, execute family reunification in various situations, and provide a safe haven for victims of international human trafficking. After all, is it not the nation’s utmost desire to be capable of building and providing The American Dream? If so, building a foundation of these ingredients is absolutely necessary in order to maintain great opportunity beyond any either country.
The fourth way to solve the problem of human trafficking is state intervention at all levels of trade. Governments of the sending and the delivering countries should confirm their position with respect to all types of agreements and programs to combat human trafficking and take steps in promoting and implementing their commitments. Unfortunately, until such cooperation is not introduced in the majority of countries, the responsibility for the results of foreign travel is imposed only on the immigrating citizen (Shelley,
The question of why we are to have open borders has been constantly asked and is the consternation of many ‘flourishing’ countries that are seen to be the popular destinations for many seeking to escape the struggles of their own countries. The reason for migration includes political reasons, the need for work, and the need to fight poverty among numerous other reasons. The arguments for the duty to have open borders have come from various ideologies; most tend to focus on the ethical reason for an open border; that of recognizing a fundamental human right. There are two central at stake here constantly asked: (i) what can morally justify a state in restricting immigration, and (ii) what gives a state the right to control immigrants?
On December 10th 1948, the General Assembly adopted a Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This declaration, although not legally binding, created “a common standard of achievement for all people and all nations.to promote respect for those rights and freedoms” (Goodhart, 379). However, many cultures assert that the human rights policies outlined in the declaration undermine cultural beliefs and practices. This assertion makes the search for universal human rights very difficult to achieve. I would like to focus on articles 3, 14 and 25 to address how these articles could be modified to incorporate cultural differences, without completely undermining the search for human rights practices.
It is therefore no longer is it credible for a state to turn its back on international law, alleging a bias towards European values and influence. All that humankind now requires to bring about the elusive, but eternal, dream of perpetual peace is a global citizenship based on a strong commitment to principles of equity and democracy grounded in civil society.
Cholewinski, R. I. (1997). Migrant Workers in International Human Rights Law: Their Protection in Countries of Employment. Clarendon Press.
Martin, P., 2008. Another Miracle? ManagingLabour Migration in Asia.Bangkok, 20-21 September, 2008, Bangkok: United Nations.