Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Basic process of conducting psychological research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Basic process of conducting psychological research
Lilly was a psychoanalyst and neurophysiologist who set out to create an environment in which he could conduct scientific research on the brain and explore its electrical activity. He was seeking to answer questions which had evaded him thus far in the several decades of his prior research. After concluding that he could go no further in his research of the correspondence between brain and mind without harming or changing the brain, Lilly began seeking answers in a different realm, the brain’s consciousness. In particular, he was curious about what was required for the brain to remain in a conscious state. At the time, science had two contrasting theories on this matter. The first was that the brain required external stimulus to remain conscious. …show more content…
With his associate, Jay Shurley, MD, Lilly created a rubber mask and breathing contraption as their first attempt at sensory restriction. The mask and tank combination proved to be very effective but quite different from the floating experience of today; the floater was suspended dangling in an upright position, submerged underwater. With the mask, Lilly and Shurley were able to block out many of the biggest contributors to sensory stimulation, including: light, sound, much gravity, temperature fluctuations, and the risk of encountering another person. The two tested their invention on themselves and quickly concluded that the brain did not need external stimuli to stay conscious, and instead relied on its own internal systems. Finding their sensory deprivation experience to be extremely relaxing and restorative, rather than what many had assumed would be stressful; they had great motivation to continue exploring the therapy. The scientific community of the time did not embrace his discoveries, but Lilly continued his floatation
Women have faced oppression in the literary community throughout history. Whether they are seen as hysterical or unreliable, women writers seem to be faulted no matter the topics of their literature. However, Anne Bradstreet and Margaret Fuller faced their critics head-on. Whether it was Bradstreet questioning her religion or Fuller discussing gender fluidity, these two women did not water down their opinions to please others. Through their writings, Bradstreet and Fuller made great strides for not just women writers, but all women.
In year 1969 Dr. Malcolm Sayer, a neurologist, was accepted at the Bronx Hospital, wherein he was ask to deal with patients with mental problems. He had a problem dealing with communicating with patients, which was reprimanded by a nurse named Eleanor. He then noticed the catatonic patients, who survived the epidemic, Encephalitis Lethergica. He noticed that there were responses through their stimuli in the patients that they can still catch a ball even with no direct knowledge about it. Dr. Sayer then work intensively to accomplish the goal of waking the patients in their catatonic state. He then encountered a patient named Leonard Lowe, who was a patient who suffers the Encephalitis Lethergica at young age, who was able to communicate with
Newman, J. B., Banks, W. P., & Baars, B. J. (2003). Essential Sources in the Scientific Study of Consciousness. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
To conclude this essay, I like to emphazise that Rosenthal's HOT is more of an empirical hypothesis, rather than an analysis of the term ‘consciousness.’ His aim is precisely to explain the phenomena of consciousness in relation to other mental states, such as thought and perception, and while achieving this, he has elaborated a theoretical structure for comprehending the functions of our mind.
Before coming up with the main experiment, Dr. Limb asked the question, “How can the brain generate that much information spontaneously?” He then came ...
Hicks, Brain. The Holdouts. Smithsonian 41.11 (2011): 50-60. Academic Search Premier. Web. 8 Nov. 2013
Renner, T., Feldman, R., Majors, M., Morrissey, J., & Mae, L. (2011). States of Consciousness. Psychsmart (pp. 99-107). New York: McGraw-Hill.
A methodology that I believe has some chance of providing us with a better understanding of the nature of consciousness – or of how it could be that consciousness does not exist, if the eliminativists are right – is one in which we study our conception or picture of consciousness. Specifically, I am referring to our conception or picture of phenomenal consciousness – what one has in mind who, e.g., "gets" the mind-body problem, understands the inverted spectrum or absent qualia examples, or Nagel’s phrase that it is like something to be conscious, and so on. Such individuals, arguably, are thinking about consciousness in a more or less similar way, exploiting a similar conception or picture, similar conceptual structures. Studying such a conception should be, to a reasonable degree at least, just like studying any other conception in cognitive science. And, as with other conceptions, the effort can be a multidisciplinary one, one to which philosophers can contribute. As I said, I think following this route might lead to progress in our understanding of consciousness itself; but even if it does not, characterizing our conception of phenomenal consciousness has importance at least as a piece of psychology. In any event, it is how I am inclined to pursue the study of consciousness these days. This talk describes a small study within that broader project.
Ramachandran, V. S., and Sandra Blakeslee. Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind. New York: Quill, 1999. Print.
[4] Guven Guzeldere (1995) 'Consciousness: What it is & how to study it' Journal of Consciousness Studies vol.2, no.1; pp. 30-51
Consciousness is a difficult term to grasp; so much so, that many scientists will not even attempt to define the term, much less search for it’s evidence. Most however, do agree that consciousness must include certain aspects; specifically cognition, self-awareness, memory, and abstract thought.
The idea of consciousness has been contemplated throughout the course of neurobiology and behavior. When does it begin or end? And what, precisely, is consciousness? Though researchers may only approximate the answers to these questions, a few things may be inferred. Since the subconscious mind is the sleeping mind, the conscious mind can be thought of as the awakened mind, the mind which shows itself to others most often. (1) This is not to say that the conscious mind is reality, because (as will later be explained) reality is quite subjective. (1) It is just that the conscious mind is the one most people associate with reality. For example, people who experience an event while dreaming will refer to it as a dream, because it occurred in their subconscious. Whereas, if the event had occurred while they were awake-in their conscious mind-frame, then it would be considered as an actual experience.
...n, convergent evidence indicates that animals have neuroanatomical, neurochemical,a nd neurophysiological substrates of consciousness stets together with the ability to show intentional behaviors. Therefore, humans are not the only one in possessing the neurological substrates that generate consciousness.
While it is the common belief and understanding that consciousness is dependent on the functioning of the brain, philosophers and resea...
To fully understand what we currently know about consciousness, we need to take a look at what scientists have uncovered about the human brain and its role in it.