How Charismatic Leaders Obtain Powerful Influence

1871 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Power and leadership

An illustrious man by the name of Dwight D. Eisenhower once defined leadership as “The art of getting someone else to do something you want done because he wants to do it.” This is precisely the type of manipulative thinking that certain narcissistic charismatic leaders possess, which often allows them to have a powerful influence over others. In this paper, I will examine the charismatic leadership style and discuss how charismatic leaders can obtain a resilient and persuasive influence over others in certain social situations. In particular, I will concentrate on charismatic leaders whom are personalized charismatic leaders, and whom possess the additional trait of narcissism, because when the three qualities are coalesced, the result has the potential to be extremely hazardous to everyone around.

Primarily, let us explore behaviors and traits that are associated with a person being viewed as a leader. Leaders are likely to be somewhat smarter, outgoing, motivated by their craving for influence and control, charismatic, very capable socially, fearless of change, certain of their guidance capabilities, and often have reduced neurosis (Aronson, Elliot, Wilson, Timothy D., & Akert, Robin M., 2007, p. 293). The contingency theory of leadership contends that leadership success is dependant upon the degree of how task focused or relationship focused the person who is leading is and the measure of power and influence the leader possesses over the followers (Aronson, et al., 2007, p. 294). There are several different leadership styles, such as autocratic, charismatic, exchange, situational, strategic, Laissez Faire, transformational, facilitative, and more. Each of these styles is unique, and often a leader may encompass more than on...

... middle of paper ...

...& Balthazard, P. (2010). Visionary communication

qualities as mediators of the relationship between narcissism and attributions of

leader charisma. Personnel Psychology, 63(3), 509-537. doi:10.1111/j.1744-

6570.2010.01179.x

Jacobsen, C., & House, R. J. (2001). Dynamics of charismatic leadership: A process

theory, simulation model, and tests. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(1), 75-112.

doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00065-0

Sankowsky, D. (1995). The charismatic leader as narcissist: Understanding the abuse of

power. Organizational Dynamics, 23(4), 57-71. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(95)90017-9

Shalit, A., Popper, M., & Zakay, D. (2010). Followers' attachment styles and their

preference for social or for personal charismatic leaders. Leadership & Organization

Development Journal, 31(5), 458-472. doi:10.1108/01437731011056461

Show More
Related

  • The Trait Approach To Leadership Theory: Are Leaders Are Born Or Made?

    1915 Words  | 4 Pages

    The basic premise behind trait theory was that are leaders born or made. Leaders trait research examined the physical, social as well as mental aspect of a individual. In general these studies simply look for significant associations between individual traits and measure of leadership effectiveness. The initial result was that leader trait was that there were no universal traits that consistently separate effective leaders from other individual but in final result explain that that early research considered the impact of situation variables that might moderate the relationship between leader trait and measure of leader effectiveness. Therefore due to lack of consistent findings l individual traits to leadership effectiveness, studies of leader traits were largely abandoned in 1950. Contingency approach is also an important approach in leader subject, this approach was first to specify how situational factor interact with leader traits and behavioral which influence leadership quality and its effectiveness of a person. According to theory leader should make contact with subordinates goal attainment, strengthen subordinates ' expectancies that improved performance will lead to valued rewards, and provide coaching to make the path to payoffs easier for subordinates. Path-goal theory suggests that the leader behavior that will accomplish these tasks depends upon the subordinate and environmental contingency factors. But this approach has not been successful as it has been criticize on both theatrically and method approach However, it remains one of the better-known theories of leadership and offers important in stories of the interaction between subordinate and

    Read More

  • The American Presidency: Evolution in Time

    2445 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...atter? The Role of Charisma in Public Leadership." Congress & the Presidency 29 (2002): 25-47.

    Read More

  • Communication in Leadership Is Vital to an Organization's Success

    1145 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the contingency theory of leadership, the success of the leader is a function of various contingencies in the form of subordinates, task, and group variables. Fred Fielder advanced the first theory using the contingency theory of effectiveness. The main idea of the theory is that leadership effectiveness in terms of group performance depends on the proper match between the leader’s style effectiveness and the degree to which the situation gives the leader control. Fiedler created the least preferred co-worker (LPC) questionnaire to identify the style by measuring whether a person is task or relationship oriented. Where an individual with a favorable description, would have a high LPC score, suggesting a r...

    Read More

  • Charismatic Leadership Influence

    1482 Words  | 3 Pages

    “The key to successful leadership today is influence, not authority”. The idea of the quote can be explained by Charismatic Leadership that founded by Max Weber in the 1920’s. Sociologist Max Weber defined charismatic leadership as individuals who possess “a gift of grace”. Charismatic leaders have strong visionary qualities and the ability to engage others in action. Furthermore, he also defines charismatic leaders are like hero or people with extraordinary qualities (12Manage, 2016). Weber (1947) stated that leaders with high charisma often be viewed as they have endowed with exceptional powers.

    Read More

  • Charismatic Leadership Research Paper

    998 Words  | 2 Pages

    Goleman (1998) described charismatic leaders as being able to control their emotions as well as understand the emotions of the team, displaying an idea termed “emotional intelligence.” Using this knowledge, leaders have the ability to mold and influence a team. Teams react with high self-esteem and...

    Read More

  • Interview With a Human Resources Manger

    2809 Words  | 6 Pages

    The leadership is a result of a combination of traits, with special emphasis on the personal qualities of the leader, which he should possess certain personality traits that would be special facilitators in leadership performance. This theory shows that leaders are born as such, there is no likelihood of 'making' them later with personal development techniques.

    Read More

  • Leadership, Fear, Characters And Characteristics Of Effective Leadership

    856 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thus, a leader may be defined by certain qualities and skills, as well as the demonstrated ability to use certain task-oriented and relational-oriented behaviors that may be dependent on a situation, or simply the desire to accomplish a specific task or goal; furthermore, a leader may also be defined by power along with power’s use or misuse. According to many followers, the most desirable leadership traits are honesty, forward-thinking, competency, inspiration, and intelligence (Shead, 2016). Amongst the follower defined leadership traits, honesty was identified as the essential leadership quality that causes people to follow a leader; thus, the courage to admit failure is the most reliable sign that a leader is honest and accountable to the follower (Shead, 2016). Ultimately, in behavioral science a leader is defined by effectiveness, and, unfortunately, behavioral science is still attempting to define effectiveness by a single leadership

    Read More

  • Personality And Importance Of Personality

    2005 Words  | 5 Pages

    Leadership has been studied and defined since the beginning of times. Throughout history, the leadership theory was characterized by the idea of leaders being great men who were brave and sources of authority and Justice (Marsiglia). However, leadership theories have changed over time and new ones have been developed. Similarly, in today’s time, a leader’s leadership style is defined as the way a leader approaches action towards followers to accomplish a mission. Despite the fact that leadership styles are vital, it is concluded that the essence of leadership is actually an individual’s personality and what provides the motivation, purpose, and direction to lead efficiently towards accomplishments. Personality types are known to be important in leadership because they help a leader develop followers accordingly, make valuable and timely decisions, and have a different perspective to accomplish a job. Personality shapes leadership and therefore also leadership styles. Without personality, there would be no leadership styles. Personality types provides the base for leadership development, style, and the foundations for qualities needed for any leadership position.

    Read More

  • How Leaders Inspire and Influence Others

    896 Words  | 2 Pages

    To inspire and influence others, a leader must have many skills and abilities. As motivational speaker Jim Rohn, states, “ the challenge of leadership is to be strong, but not rude; be kind, but not weak; be bold, but not bully; be thoughtful, but not lazy; be humble, but not timid; be proud, but not arrogant; have humor, but without folly.” (2010) Moving an entire group of individuals toward a singular goal is a considerable undertaking. Without effective communication skills and a clear vision of what needs to be accomplished, one will feel like they are trying to herd cats rather than leading.

    Read More

  • Aspect Of Leadership Essay

    1811 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the contingency leadership theories both the task and the follower’s characteristics are used to determine which behavior is better suited for effective leadership. Within the contingency approach are several factors to consider: the quality of relationships, tasks and activities to be performed, perceptions of the leader based on history, the motivation of both the leader and the follower, and personal characteristics influencing the situation (Leadership Theories and Studies, 2009). The first contingency leadership theories studies were conducted by Fred Fiedler, a leadership researcher and the earliest pioneer in the field of contingency leadership, who focused on how situational variables interact with leader personality and behavior (Contingency Approach to Management, 2009); from these studies he developed the contingency leadership model. The contingency leadership model is used to determine whether a person’s leadership style is task– or relationship-oriented, and if the situation (leader-member relationships, task structure and position power) matches the leader’s style to maximize performance (Lussier & Achua, 2010). Fielder discovered that leadership effectiveness was dependent on the factors of the leader–follower relationship, task structure, and leader position.

    Read More

  • Charismatic Leaders

    989 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many great leaders have one thing in common and that is charisma. Charismatic leaders are those that have the capability to inspire and encourage people to do more than they would normally do, despite obstacles and personal sacrifice. (Daft, R.L, pg. 364) Charisma is what provokes energy and commitment out of its followers. These leaders possess the power to motivate their followers to do almost anything. They create an atmosphere of change and express an ideal vision of a better future. The most common characteristics of the charismatic leader involve maturity, communication, humility, and inspiration. These unique qualities impact their followers and conduct themselves in such a way that allows for remarkable results. Then one wonders, is charisma something you are born with? And if not, is it possible for it to be developed or even trained through life experiences?

    Read More

  • Narcissism In The Workplace Essay

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    Narcissist tend to think that they are better leaders than what they actually are according to their peers and coworkers. Proverbs 29:2 says "When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn" (King James Bible Online, 2015). Robbins & Judge (2009) describe narcissism as an individual “who has a grandiose sense of self-importance, requires excessive admiration, has a sense of entitlement, and is arrogant.” Poet Tony Hoagland brought up a valid observation in the textbook about the American culture When there came time for a big project, I noticed that he was always the one to be congratulated and rewarded by the management team for the work that the members of his team actually did. He really believed that he had done all of the work and only he should be credited for it, just because he was the team lead and senior member of the team.

    Read More

  • Charismatic Leadership

    1015 Words  | 3 Pages

    Has perception of charismatic leadership changed the playing field for the types of leaders that organizations are in search of? Many feel that the weight of the leader’s charisma as the focus of leadership needs to be re-examined. As a result, the charismatic leader may be viewed probably as one of the most contentious leadership styles because of the focus on the leader’s personal characteristics, often defining them as narcissists. Given the large number of narcissists at the helm or corporations today, the challenge facing organizations is to ensure that such leaders do not self-destruct or lead the company to disaster (Maccoby, 2000).

    Read More

  • Leadership Theory

    1819 Words  | 4 Pages

    Trait theories are „theories that consider personal qualities and characteristics that differentiate leaders from nonleaders." Early results aimed at confirming this theory were inconclusive. Many research studies were conducted and each identified key traits supposed to differentiate leaders from nonleaders. The problem is that they didn't get the same results, thus failing to discover common traits, which should have shown in each research study. When applying the Big Five Personality framework (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability and openness to experience) to the study and research of leadership traits, results were more encouraging. They showed that the most important trait for leaders was extraversion. Still, this founding sh...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Charismatic Leader

    842 Words  | 2 Pages

    “The important word there is inspire. The key difference between managers and leaders is that managers tell people what to do, while leaders inspire them to do it. Inspiration comes from three things: clarity of one’s vision, courage of their conviction and the ability to effectively communicate both of those things”

    Read More

More about How Charismatic Leaders Obtain Powerful Influence

Open Document