Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Decision making and its consequences
Decision making
Understanding the decision making process
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Decision making and its consequences
Warren G. Bennis and Robert J. Thomas’ book Geek and Geezers (2002), provides a unique look at cross-generation of leadership, the ability to succeed, and how a leader defines success through the crucible. Bennis and Thomas originally started the study on young and old leaders to show the influences of era on leadership, but it became obvious that there was more. They interviewed a total of 43 leaders of which one group was over 70 years of age, the “geezers’ and the second group consisted of leaders under the age of 35, the “geeks”. From their study, Bennis and Thomas believe that they have identified the “process an individual makes meaning out of often difficult events which is called the crucible” (W. Bennis; R. Thomas, pg. 4). Bennis …show more content…
Eras happen every eighteen years and can be defined by an event that falls within them, but the challenges or opportunities that happen within those eras can be different for each person based on their leadership abilities. The geezers that were surveyed grew up during the time of “era of limits” which meant it was: time of cautious optimism – a period in which men and women alike were encouraged to play the game hard but to play it by the rules, to be loyal to company and country with the expectation that such loyalty would be rewarded (48).
The geezers are linear narrative thinkers which believed in an organized chain of command and a hierarchy within the command (11). The geeks grew up during the time of “era of options” which meant unlike the geezers, the geeks were about “making history” by being over ambitious and exploring all opportunities, but wanted balance in their life too. Geeks want to “change the world” or make it a better place to live in instead of focusing on money. Geeks see many opportunities for jobs and growth, but loyalty to one company was not something they thought about. Geeks said the main feature of their era was speed because “it was the digital world which was nonlinear and had ditched the corporate pyramid for the flat organization” (11). What had taken the geezers 20 years to learn, the geeks could do in a couple of
…show more content…
Leaders with adaptive capacity have confidence, optimism, can handle situations without uncertainty, explore technological ideas versus ignoring them; they are flexible and determined to find resolution within problems, and most of all, the leaders “are not paralyzed by fear or undermined by anxiety in difficult situations” (101-102). Bennis and Thomas learned that their leaders who sought out expertise information when needed always understood the benefit of using someone else’s wisdom for their own growth. The crucible transformed these leaders and becomes a turning point where each leader felt different than they had prior to the crucible. Bennis and Thomas asked what made each leader make the decision to change and the results where the same; they had come to a crossroads where they could either stay or “jump to the next plateau” (105). The geeks and geezers choose to make choices, to take responsibilities, to do something new, or do the right thing (105). Both groups of leaders understood that they may not always get what they want when they took a risk, but they did learn from the risk they took. “Learning how to learn was one of the most valuable tools they took away from their crucible experience, and it was one of the all-purpose tools, along with creativity”
The Geeks Shall Inherit The Earth is a book by Alexandra Robbins which summarizes the story of seven different teenagers that have many different problems, which many of todays teenagers also have. I found myself having many similarities to the teenagers in the story, for example, when with her group Whitney, the popular bitch, thinks “You didn't day that when we were alone, but now that you're in front of a group you do” (Robbins 21). I can relate to this because I feel as though many people are pressured to say or do things they normally wouldn't whenever they are with their group or ‘clique’. Robbins has this idea that the freaks and geeks, or “cafeteria fringe” will someday grow up and use what they are criticized for to become more successful than the other peopler people. She calls this the ‘Quirk Theory’ (Robbins page 11). This helped me to learn that right now, in high school, not being ‘popular’ may seem like the end of the world, but the reality of it is that after these four years, it wont even matter, but what will be important is how you learned to grow as a person and the true friendships that were made. This makes me want to focus more on my education and learning to grow as a person instead of focusing on how many friends I have or who I sit with at lunch, because truthfully it wont matter once high school is over.
“Leaders have always been generalists. Tomorrow’s leaders will, very likely, have begun life as specialists, but to mature as leaders they must sooner or later climb out of the trenches of specialization and rise above the boundaries that separate the various segments of society.” (Gardner, 1990, pg. 159).
The geeks grew up during the time of “era of options” which meant unlike the geezers, the geeks were about “making history” by being over ambitious and exploring all opportunities, but wanted balance in their life too. Geeks wanted to “change the world” or make it better place to live in instead of focusing on money. Geeks saw many opportunities for jobs and growth, but loyalty to one company was not something they thought about. Geeks said the main feature of their era was speed. “It was the digital world which was nonlinear and had ditched the corporate pyramid for the flat organization (11).” What had taken the geezers 20 years to learn the geeks could do in a couple of
A leader’s age and generation plays a significant role in the way they communicate. When different generations come together they bring with them their own worldviews and expectations. An effective leader is able to step out of their generational preferences and customize the way they communicate to the other generations. By effectively addressing and taking advantage of those unique generational differences they can bridge the generations together to create a collaborative, innovative and exciting work environment resulting in a highly productive and performing workforce.
However with these differences, there are also similarities between the generations. There is a reason that these different generations with dissimilar perspectives are within the same organization. All generations in the workforce value rewards. They look for the same job features, which are a job that is stimulating, where there are opportunities for growth, and additionally where the salary and management of the association is respectable. It is a known notion across generations that technology is needed to increase efficiency, effectiveness and productivity, however the biggest difference is in the application (Srinivasan, 2012). The best way to have all means met by the diverse generational workforce is by implicating a high-performance work system where the organization has the best possible fit between their social system (people...
What often is overlooked is that the demands on today’s leaders have become incredibly complex broad in scope. Contemporary society is less responsive to the appeal of great man leaders and is less willing to play a docile follower role,...
Upon entering the workforce, this generation worked for organizations that had “clear lines of authority, strict assignment of responsibilities, rank based on seniority, and an implied work contract; they expected to work for the same company until retirement and valued job security and stability” (Fore, 2013). However, because this generation was often absorbed with the past, “technology represented an unpleasant change that required training and adjustment, as it affected both their work and personal lives” (Fore, 2013).
Stereotyped in popular media as whining, self-absorbed, narcissistic, overindulged and tech-addled, the Millennial generation - born 1980 through 2000 - is generally considered to be the epitome of spoiled unreasonableness. Now that Millennials are making strides in the workplace, it is evident that those stereotypes are based more on anecdotes rather than reality. In fact it now appears that they very much echo their Boomer parents, which is why they are often referred to as Echo Boomers. Simply put, where Boomers have an optimistic outlook of the world, Millennials are hopeful; where Boomer work ethic is driven, Millennials are determined; where Boomers have a love / hate relationship with authority, Millennials treat authority with politeness; where Boomers believe in leadership by consensus, Millennials believe in leadership by pulling together; and where personal gratification is the impetus for Boomer relationships, Millennials have no personal motivation for relationships which are inclusive and with no boundaries (Zemke, Raines & Filipczak, 2013).
The distinctions and interrelationships of Psychology and Business pose important questions and deepen our understanding and potential for solutions and breakthrough ideas. Being Wrong by Kathryn Schulz is about our obsession with being right and how the relationship of error and transformation can teach us about who we are. Good To Great by Jim Collins analyzes the histories of twenty-eight companies discovering the key elements of greatness and why some companies make the leap and others do not. The challenges individuals face when they err are vital towards their understanding of the importance of searching and learning from our mistakes. The internal, emotional component of disparity, surprise, confusion, embarrassment, amusement, anguish, remorse, and delight may result from wrongness, but the force to face up to error is ours alone. By studying every area of management strategy and practice, Collins believes the transition from good-to-great lies within having the right people who will do the right thing to deliver the best results for the common good of the company. Level 5 leaders are ambitious, disciplined, and diligent but “first and foremost for the company, not themselves” (Collins 39). Error is central to our lives and “our mistakes are part and parcel of our brilliance” (Schulz 121). One must “face up to [their] wrongness in the faith that, having learned something, [they] will get it right the next time” (Schulz 339). “Managing your [individual] problems [by confronting error] can only make you good where as building your opportunities [based on the mistakes one has made] is the only way to become great” (Collins 59). Acceptance, openness, and reliance of oneself offer the potential of one to evolve into a Level 5 ...
These three generations: Baby Boomers, Gen X and Gen Y all bring their own share of values, beliefs, thoughts and opinions, perspective and experiences to the workplace. The dynamics of the workplace is directly affected by the differences among these three generations. Today’s current managers need to understand how to efficiently manage and lead a multigenerational workforce in order to increase productivity and meet organization goals and objectives. Recently, there has been changes in the general management. From 2008 to 2013, there was some serious shift in Gen X and Gen Y moving into managerial roles. According to Matthew Golden from Biz Journals, the most prominent change was 87% of Gen Y moved into more managerial roles compared to
The vision of leadership that leaders are born made, and not learn to be leaders is still considered but not popular among researchers (Avolio et al, 2013).
Have you ever had a leader that inspired you to develop your own leadership traits? “A leader is someone who demonstrates what’s possible” (Mark Yarnell, 2015). There are numerous leadership styles. Each of the numerous leadership styles can be beneficial if utilized in an appropriate means. I have chosen three leaders and their unique leadership styles to discuss in this paper. The unique styles that will be discussed are situational leadership, transformational leadership, and laissez-faire leadership. I will also discuss each leader’s approaches, their fundamental leadership principles, and how each leader used their style within their profession.
P. (1999). What Leaders Really Do: Motivating people vs. controlling and problem solving. In What Leaders Really Do (pp. 59-62). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
The monumental consequences of strategic decisions call for individuals with unique performance abilities who can navigate the volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity. inherent in the nature of those decisions. Aspiring leaders can rise to the challenge by undergoing self-assessment and personal.
Leaders are those who have a great influence on the lives of many people. This is especially relevant in today’s organizations, which face extreme time changes and an increasingly growing complexity (Yukl, 1998).