Film Analysis Of Django Unchained

700 Words2 Pages

Quentin Taratinos’ Django Unchained (2012), is a bloody, eccentric, and revenge filled western, which exploits the abdominal chapters in American history. A pre-civil war western that explores what slavery might have been like during the mid-1800. The movie is partially based on the films Django (1966) and Mandingo (1975). But Taratino incorporates his own style, with excruciating gore, action, wit, cinematography and eccentric characters. Incorporating it all into a solid plot makes the movie believable and makes it the most unique western every made. The movie opens with a line of slaves chained to each other walking in a dark forest. A dentist named Dr. King Schultz (Christopher Waltz) appears and asks for the slave named Django (Jamie Foxx). Dr. King Schultz negotiates with the slave owner to purchase Django since he is valuable for finding people of interest. After acquiring Django, they horseback across the country passing the beautiful mountains of the mid-west, the star filled sky of Wyoming, the desert in the west, snowy mountains of the Rockies, and then making their destination to the plantations of the south. Where they meet one of the biggest slave owners of Kentucky. Django meets some of the slaves there where majority of them are uneducated and speak
Such as the director Spike Lee who said “I cant speak on it cause I 'm not gonna see it, All I 'm going to say is that it 's disrespectful to my ancestors. That 's just me...I 'm not speaking on behalf of anybody else.” Spike makes a valid point here, the movie uses the n-word excessively. But the movie is about slavery in the 1800’s a time when that word was frequently. Taratinos’ goal is to make realistic movies and often focuses on touchy subjects in history. In his movies he rewrites history with revenge and that is why Django Unchained is

Open Document