Failure Of Reconstruction Essay

1337 Words3 Pages

The end of the Civil War in 1865 may have put an end to large scale military campaigns, but it put no end to the original discussions and debates that led to the war. The Nation was left just as divided at the wars end then when it had started. The questions pertaining to what should be done with the slaves (now former) still existed and had only grown from the Emancipation Proclamation. The nation lost Lincoln to an assassin and was left for a time with Andrew Johnson. These problems were compounded with new issues arising from the discussion of what should be done with the rebel states. The time after the war would usher in the age of Reconstruction as these questions were addressed and would eventually lead to many failures and successes …show more content…

Though Reconstruction was heavy handed on the south during its early years with the loss of slaves being a heavy economic hit and carpet baggers taking up positions of government. However, Southerners recovered rather quickly finding that to improve their situation they would just have to reclaim their previous positions in their state governments. Michael Perman in an essay about failures of Republican rule in the south write, “The defeat of the Republicans was essential, but the real objective was something larger. It was the ending of Reconstruction, a program and a regime that had been imposed on the South”. The first step to bring about the end of reconstruction was to reclaim everything the blacks and carpet baggers took. Southern Radicals began a reign of terror directed at Republicans and blacks through the rejuvenated Ku Klux Klan in 1866. Through this terror and an increasingly disinterested Republican government towards the South. Reconstruction began to fade away and eventually ended with the Compromise of 1877 which withdrew all Northern troops from the South. The Southerners despite starting the war could become readmitted to the Union under relatively lax terms, lost their slaves, but were able to force the freed blacks out of society once Reconstruction …show more content…

In the actual time frame of Reconstruction of 1865 to 1877 not so much. Reconstruction failed to uphold the nations fundamental beliefs in liberty when dealing with the freed black populace, but it was important that the slaves were made free. The true strength and success of Reconstruction comes from its role in laying the groundwork for the 20th century’s Civil Rights movement. The period of Reconstruction where blacks could vote and hold public office set a precedent for the future that was eventually picked up on during the Civil Rights movement and used for evidence that they were capable of being equal to whites. Reconstruction was never going to be able to sway the racist ideals of millions of white Southerners and even Northerners in thirteen years. While yes, the North could have kept troops in the South and continued to enforce black rights, but it would have only led to additional resentment and hatred towards the North. If anything, the optimal path was reached. The nation emerged reunified with the same constitution and ideals the country was founded upon and set in motion the eventual acceptance (generally speaking) of the black

Open Document