Eye Witness Account Analysis

492 Words1 Page

There are many differences in the accounts given by survivors of the revolutionary war who participated in the Boston Tea Party. For instance, the first differences that was spotted is that only one of the three accounts given stated the age of the participant at the time of the act. The second differences is that in the “Eye Witness Account” by George Hews, he mentions that a committee met in order to negotiate whether or not the Boston Tea Party was really necessary, they went to work out other arrangements with a governor, however, the governor was not at the meeting place so they decided to take action, the other two accounts have no mention of this. David Kinnison states a specific amount of men and how many had which weapons and how many had dressed …show more content…

All the stories seem consistent with other accounts and historical textbooks of what happened and the people involved. Dresses up as an Indian, he joined 50 other men in the historical event known as the Boston Tea Party. While sources do not say he was in charge of anything in the event, I speculate Paul Revere did in fact play a large role in the actions that night. It is within reason to believe that he may have been a self appointed leader who told his acquaintances where to throw the tea in the harbor so it causes the most damage to it. The response to the Boston Tea Party from the British was to shut down Boston Harbor until all the crates of tea were paid for (Boston Tea Party Ship, n/a). They also enacted a few more acts, these acts have two different names. They are, the Coercive Acts and the Intolerable Acts. These acts contained The boston Port Act, the Massachusetts Government Act, the Administration Justice Act, the Quartering Act and the Quebec Act (Alchin, n/a). Because of these acts the colonists started openly rebelling more often to Britain's rule. They started to create their own governments and formed a continental

Open Document