Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Medieval England
Chapter 14 the high middle ages
The high middle ages
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Medieval England
The earliest stages of European “nation building” occurred during the High Middle Ages. Unfortunately, it was a very slow process due to the European kings encountering difficulties in their attempts to increase their control over their territories and subjects. Using the French and the English monarchies as examples, we can see what difficulties they faced in trying to increase their control and what strategies they used that yield gains and losses. In England there were more instances of kings encountering difficulties in their quest to increase their control over their territories and subjects more so than the French kings. In England, William of Normandy was crowned King of England in 1066. Under his reign, he merged Anglo-Saxon and Norman …show more content…
The power of the Capetian kings was limited to their territory around Paris but because they were anointed kings and represented the idea of unity inherited from Charlemagne, they had high prestige. These kings overcame the old Frankish custom of partible inheritance by anointing their successor in their own life time. Their title and property was then passed down in tact from generation to generation. This was a successful strategy that kept the power in the hands of the kings. King Philip II came to reign in 1180. Philip II conquered many lands and increased the income of the French monarchy and its power. He governed his territories by appointing royal officials to administer justice and collect royal revenues. By doing this he created the French royal bureaucracy (Spielvogel).” Philip II picked his royal officials from the ranks of knights and clerics to lessen his reliance on the Barons which allowed him more power. The Capetian kings maintained a close relationship with the Catholic Church with the only exception of the circumstance with Philip IV. Philip IV insisted on his right to tax the French Church and to judge the French clergy in civil Courts. This forced the Church to back down and grant Gallican Liberties to Philip to tax and judge the French clergy. He convened the first French Parliament to gain the approval of his subjects for his actions. In this way Philip IV effectively strengthened the French
John Merriman, A History of Modern Europe, Volume 1, (London, New York). Class Notes Class Documents HI 4712 Class Readings HI 4712
The European monarchs and rulers of the 17th and 18th centuries wanted to increase their power both domestically and globally by adding to their territories and populations. Both in merging their power internally and expanding their power externally, they employed three features of state-building: control, extraction, and integration. In the late 1700s, both the Industrial revolution and French revolution of 1789 strengthened the idea that Europeans were different from the rest of the world. It also strengthened that Europeans were “succeeding” promptly while the rest of the world seemed to be declining, that Europeans were somehow extraordinary and better than the rest.” (Robert Marks page 10).
A second piece of evidence that supports the argument in the passage that the New Monarchs of Western European states during the 16th and 17th centuries consolidated their power by centralizing their government is Philip II’s creation of an effective bureaucracy. In the mid 16th century, Philip II organized the nobility in
In the little kingdoms or principalities, the lands over which a King ruled were regarded as no different from other property. Among the Franks, all sons were entitled to a share. Therefore, when a King died, each son became a King over his own little kingdom. Thus, many political units became small so there were no uniform laws or policies. This lack of unity made them vulnerable to enemies as well as conflict from within. Bullough points out that the loyalty of a warrior or subject to his chosen leader was not a light matter. The author does not contrast that concept of loyalty however, with our present ideas of loyalty to the homeland or institution.
For instance, in 1481, the “Catholic Kings” were what Ferdinand and Isabella were known as. The kingdom of Castile and Aragon were ruled together, but not as countries. It was a union of crowns (Isaacs). “The two kingdoms maintained their separate l...
Throughout the middle ages, many empires were working on expanding their territory, but it was not always a success unless they had the appropriate leadership to guide them in the right direction. The main empire that grew to extraordinary lengths is that of the Roman Empire. Through many conquests and battles and with an amicable government, it attained its fortune. However, on the other hand, there was another government that shared similarities with that of Rome; this was the empire of Charlemagne, otherwise known as the Carolingian Empire, but it failed to have a prosperous eternity.
Rulers of the High Middle Ages overcame challenges to their power and began the process of recentralization by removing power from other nobles and the Church and by increasing their own power. These changes were not liked by the people that the rulers were taking power from, but that did not stop rulers from continuing to pilfer power from others. Rulers of the High Middle Ages did anything they could to increase their power and decrease that of their opposition, such as requiring their vassals to declare loyalty to the king and by declaring themselves a higher power than church officials and their nobles.
Not only was France’s taxation system unethical and dishonorable but it was one of the main causes of the French Revolution. The King not only spent a large portion of France’s money on military expenses but the nobility and the King as well as his family spent money on themselves, just to maintain their luxurious living. Meaning the third, poorest estate was basically paying for everything they couldn’t afford, “…the peasants paid taxes to the king, taxes to the church, taxes and dues to the lord of the manor, as well as numerous indirect taxes on wine, salt, and bread (Kreis, 2000, pg. 4). Due to the massive inease in taxes the Third Estate found it very hard just to survive and be able to feed their families. Prices due to taxes always continued to increase, “…wages had increased by 22% while the cost of living increased 62%” (Kreis, 2000, pg. 4). Not only did the relentless tax laws lead to the eruption of the French Revolution but it also caused many other conflicts.
The main goal of new and absolute monarchies was the centralize the state. War, civil war, class war, feudal rebellion, and banditry afflicted a good deal of Europe in the middle of the fifteenth century. Various rulers now tried to impose a kind of civil peace. They thus laid the foundations for the national states. Similarly, in the early part of the 17th century, wars pertaining now to religion and dynasty had a profound impact upon the western European states. As military spending increased, monarchs realized the importance unifying their state possessed.
The Reformation spurred a wave of political devolution throughout Europe in the early 1500s, the most obvious example being that of the Holy Roman Empire. Although the nobility of the Holy Roman Empire had managed to keep hold of its power throughout a time of political unification, the Reformati...
Originally when feudalism was 1st forming in the Carolingian Empire, the king divided his empire among his counts, who were directly responsible back to him. It is known as the king-lord contract; where a king grants the lesser with land and in ret...
Many things effected society in Medieval Europe, some having a more profound effect than others. Europe in the Middles ages was a time of learning and of cultural growth, but it was also a time of more serious things such as the Black Death. The way Europe coped with these unforeseen challenges, helped shape their society and culture, and we still learn about them today.
In 1066 when his claim to the English throne was threatened by Harold Godwinson. Due to the fact that Harold Godwinson overlooked the dead king's wishes. Edward the Confessor, sworn his loyalty to William of Normandy when he died not to Harold. Harold Godwinson promptly had himself proclaimed king. It was only a matter of months before William, Duke of the large and powerful duchy of Normandy in France, paid Harold a visit to bring to his remembrance his own claim to the throne. William raised an army of Normans by promising them land and wealth when he came into his rightful kingship. October 14th 1066 he and William fought at the famous battle of Hastings. William and his army of Normans came, saw, and conquered. True to his promise to his fellow warriors, William systematically replaced the English nobility with Norman barons and noblemen who took control of the land, the people, and the government.
Rice, Eugene E. and Anthony Grafton. The Foundations of Early Modern Europe, 1460-1559. 2nd. ed. New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1994.
The King is dead and Lord Tywin is asking Tommen, his grandson (the new King) what he thinks what makes a good King. Tommen lists off attributes such as; holiness, just, and strength. Lord Tywin, agrees that these are all good qualities to have. However, he says holiness is a naïve characteristic to have as a King [leader]. Tywin, explains that being a just King [leader] can leave you in a vulnerable place if you are not careful. Furthermore, having strength as a King [leader] is a very powerful characteristic to have when you have some many others looking towards to lead. But, all of these King [leader] attributes are nothing on their own, you can not have one without the others, but there is something missing in this picture. Tommen points out that they (pervious Kings) all lacked wisdom.