Ethical Issues In Health Care: A Case Study

431 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: The four basic principles of ethics in healthcare

In the health care setting, ethical principles must be implemented to protect and preserve the rights of patients, and to ensure that practitioners remain professional during their clinical interaction with patients. Ethics does not only differentiate between right and wrong, it prevents providers from any malicious intent to violate the rights and integrity of every patient. Health care practitioners have a responsibility to treat every patient with utmost ethical practice and quality care. The purpose of this paper is to discuss whether patients have the right to refuse treatment and if their decision is based on health care rationing. Also, will be discuss is how the patient/ provider relationship will influence a patient decision to provide constant. Per Baillie, McGeehan, Garrett, and Garrett (2013), health care professionals do not have the right to a patient without inform consent, and full disclosure of benefits and risks involve with the procedure. …show more content…

It is essential that providers and patients have good communication, trust, and mutual respect. Health care professionals must always follow ethical principles of nonmaleficence, the providers have an obligation not to cause harm or make the patient condition worse (Baillie, McGeehan, Garrett & Garrett, 20013). Patients who maintain a good relationship with their providers are more likely to give consent because of trust. In conclusion, patients have the right to refuse treatment. And health care providers must respect the patient decision to refuse treatment regardless if they believe it was not the best decision. Lack of financial resource can play a significant role in patients refusing treatments. This refusal is a direct form of both health care rationing and self-rationing. There is also a strong patient/provider influence on the decision to consent for

Show More
Related

  • Medical Paternalism Analysis

    780 Words  | 2 Pages

    Not all cases is patient autonomy the most important thing to respect and honor. There will always be situations where Medical paternalism is justified. Justifiable paternalism in a medical perspective is prolonging patients’ lives allowing them to exercise their autonomy. Failing to respect a patient’s treatment requests or denials is a violation of the autonomy at that point in time during their illness. While the previous statement is true, the medical professional is violating a patient’s future autonomy. For this reason, medical professionals have the right to act paternalistically, therefore medical paternalism is justified by means of future autonomy and obligations to promote patient

    Read More

  • Terrence Ackerman Autonomy

    1330 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to Terrence F. Ackerman, as of the 1980s the American Medical Association had to include the respect for a person’s autonomy as a principle of medical ethics (Ackerman 14, 1982). This includes having the physician provide all the medical information to the patient even if the information could cause negative implication onto the patient. The physician is also expected to withhold all information of the patient from 3rd parties (Ackerman 14, 1982). Although it is seen as standard in today’s world, in

    Read More

  • Autonomy And Paternalism Essay

    1193 Words  | 3 Pages

    Within public health, the issue of paternalism has become a controversial topic. Questions about the ethics of public health are being asked. The role of ethics in medical practice is now receiving close scrutiny, so it is timely that ethical concepts, such as autonomy and paternalism, be re-examined in their applied context (Med J Aust. 1994). Clinically, patients are treated on a one on one basis, but public health’s obligation is toward the protection and promotion of an entire population’s health. So, based on this difference, the gaping questions targeting public health now becomes, under what conditions is it right to intervene and override an individuals’ autonomy? And if so, is the paternalistic intervention justified? Part of the concern

    Read More

  • Decisions from Health Care Providers

    579 Words  | 2 Pages

    Patients are ultimately responsible for their own health and wellbeing and should be held responsible for the consequences of their decisions and actions. All people have the right to refuse treatment even where refusal may result in harm to themselves or in their own death and providers are legally bound to respect their decision. If patients cannot decide for themselves, but have previously decided to refuse treatment while still competent, their decision is legally binding. Where a patient's views are not known, the doctor has a responsibility to make a decision, but should consult other healthcare professionals and people close to the patient.

    Read More

  • Patient-Physician Relationship: The Effects of Autonomy and Paternalism

    1710 Words  | 4 Pages

    Patients’ autonomy is the respect for the decision-making capacity of competent adults. This has now been fully integrated into the practice of medicine. This ‘patient’s right’ to accept or refuse medical care changed the balance of power in the patient-physician relationship and engaged the patient more in ownership of care plans and it is viewed by patient and physician, essential for honoring the individual and his or her dignity. (4)

    Read More

  • The Ethical Roles of the Government in Medical Practice

    1564 Words  | 4 Pages

    In conclusion, every patient is worried about their rights to care but not so much are focused on the rights of the physicians providing the care. It is hard to establish a respectable practice if you are required to perform care for instances in which you object or do not want to be a part of. This detracts from the ethical background of practice and procedure every physician should hold to the highest standard.

    Read More

  • The Ethical Dilemma Of Lane V. Candura (1978)

    1297 Words  | 3 Pages

    This paper will address the ethical dilemma of informed consent vs the right to refusal of treatment by the patient. I will show the

    Read More

  • Informed Consent

    1909 Words  | 4 Pages

    Informed consent is the basis for all legal and moral aspects of a patient’s autonomy. Implied consent is when you and your physician interact in which the consent is assumed, such as in a physical exam by your doctor. Written consent is a more extensive form in which it mostly applies when there is testing or experiments involved over a period of time. The long process is making sure the patient properly understands the risk and benefits that could possible happen during and after the treatment. As a physician, he must respect the patient’s autonomy. For a patient to be an autonomous agent, he must have legitimate moral values. The patient has all the rights to his medical health and conditions that arise. When considering informed consent, the patient must be aware and should be able to give a voluntary consent for the treatment and testing without being coerced, even if coercion is very little. Being coerced into giving consent is not voluntary because others people’s opinions account for part of his decision. Prisoners and the poor population are two areas where coercion is found the most when giving consent. Terminally ill patients also give consent in hope of recovering from their illness. Although the possibilities are slim of having a successful recovery, they proceed with the research with the expectation of having a positive outcome. As stated by Raab, “informed consent process flows naturally from the ‘partnership’ between physician and patient” (Raab). Despite the fact that informed consent is supposed to educate the patients, it is now more of an avoidance of liability for physicians (Raab). Although the physician provides adequate information to his patient, how can he ensure that his patient properly ...

    Read More

  • Concept of Consent

    709 Words  | 2 Pages

    Consent is an issue of concern for all healthcare professional when coming in contact with patients either in a care environment or at their home. Consent must be given voluntary or freely, informed and the individual has the capacity to give or make decisions without fear or fraud (Mental Capacity Act, 2005 cited in NHS choice, 2010). The Mental Capacity Act perceives every adult competent unless proven otherwise as in the case of Freeman V Home Office, a prisoner who was injected by a doctor without consent because of behavioural disorder (Dimond, 2011). Consent serves as an agreement between the nurse and the patient, and allows any examination or treatment to be administered. Nevertheless, consent must be obtained in every occurrence of care as in the case of Mohr V William 1905 (Griffith and Tengrah, 2011), where a surgeon obtain consent to perform a procedure on a patient right ear. The surgeon found defect in the left ear of the patient and repaired it assuming he had obtained consent for both ear. The patient sued him and the court found the surgeon guilty of trespassing. Although there is no legal requirement that states how consent should be given, however, there are various ways a person in care of a nurse may give consent. This could be formal (written) form of consent or implied (oral or gesture) consent. An implied consent may be sufficient for taking observation or examination of patient, while written is more suitable for invasive procedure such as surgical operation (Dimond, 2011).

    Read More

  • Nursing Ethics Case Study

    1211 Words  | 3 Pages

    In critical and complicating medical cases, family members often find it tedious to decide as to what mode or procedure of treatment is idyllic for the recovery of their patient. In such cases, well-qualified and medically educated can play a pivotal role in deciding the kind of treatment that should be given to the patient to enhance its recovery. In a contrary situation a nurse may know that administering a particular drug may improve the patient’s condition, but may be refrained from conducting the required action due to doctor’s absence or non-permission. There are numerous cases through which ethical dilemmas in the profession of nursing can be discussed. Nurses in order to remain within the defined boundaries ...

    Read More

  • Patient Autonomy Case Study

    1163 Words  | 3 Pages

    Autonomy is a concept found in moral, political, and bioethical reasoning. Inside these connections, it is the limit of a sound individual to make an educated, unpressured decision. Patient autonomy can conflict with clinician autonomy and, in such a clash of values, it is not obvious which should prevail. (Lantos, Matlock & Wendler, 2011). In order to gain informed consent, a patient

    Read More

  • The Four Principles in Biomedical Ethics

    1549 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this diverse society we are confronted everyday with so many ethical choices in provision of healthcare for individuals. It becomes very difficult to find a guideline that would include a border perspective which might include individual’s beliefs and preference across the world. Due to these controversies, the four principles in biomedical ethic which includes autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice help us understand and explain which medical practices are ethical and acceptable. These principles are not only used to protect the rights of a patient but also the physician from being violated.

    Read More

  • Nursing Capacity And Consent Paper

    1290 Words  | 3 Pages

    If an adult patient refuse to give their consent and are deemed to have the mental competence or ‘capacity’ to do so, health professionals are not permitted to provide care or treatment, even in the event that this may cause the person lasting, preventable health damage, or result in death. Capacity and consent are important issues in contemporary healthcare, and issues of which nurses in all fields of practice need to have a good understanding. This paper discusses what is meant by the terms ‘capacity’, ‘consent’ and ‘informed consent’, and explores the legal, ethical and professional obligation to obtain patient consent for all healthcare treatments. What is Consent?

    Read More

  • Nursing Ethical Dilemmas

    1757 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to (Hurst et al., 2007), a challenge in the application of ethics for doctors, in the clinical setting is making a decision for the patients. Decisions making is a complex process for a doctor because different cultural have a different health status, disease and rate of death. Moreover, how people consume the medicine also consequently effect to decisions making because they do not have enough knowledge in medicine. Besides, they have to refer the hospital rules and work more hours in a week to handle the patient. All this can cause burden among doctor, thus effect their quality of care.

    Read More

  • Patients' Rights

    1624 Words  | 4 Pages

    The American Medical Association (AMA) developed a Code of Medical Ethics which includes: the patient has a right to obtain and discuss health information related to benefits, risks, and costs of treatment alternatives; patient’s can make decisions pertaining to healthcare suggested by the physician; the patient has the right to courtesy, respect, dignity, and attention to healthcare needs in a timely manner; and the patient has a right to confidentially, continuity, and adequate health care. (emedicinehealth, 2011). Communicating openly and honestly between the patient and doctor will allow both parties to make decisions to properly take care of needs.

    Read More

More about Ethical Issues In Health Care: A Case Study

Open Document