Essay On Self-Driving Car Swerve

1077 Words3 Pages

If I was the programmer, I would instruct the vehicle to continue on its intended path, regardless of the situation. If, after making a turn, I noticed a group of people in the road, I would hope that the car would make an effort to stop. However, I would not allow the self-driving car to swerve into a wall or a sole pedestrian. By changing the path from which the car originally intended to go, you make the car become a leader in this situation, not just a bystander. In order to make the car swerve, it would need an external factor to deviate from the original design. This decision carries responsibility as well. There is a difference between the vehicle choosing to swerve into a wall and choosing to hit the group of people. In fact, the vehicle would not be choosing to hit the group of people at all, the group was in the vehicle’s way. If the autonomous vehicle possessed the predisposition to drive straight after completing a turn, the vehicle should not have outside influences affect its decision. By doing so, …show more content…

“Playing God” by deciding who should live and who should die is not spiritual and is thus unethical by religious standards. The autonomous vehicle should not interfere with fate, or it will run the risk of playing God. This supports the purposed solution of allowing the self-driving car to continue on its path. Additional, religious followers would not support a car programmed to kill. While shopping for an autonomous vehicle, proponents of the Divine Command Theory of Ethics would rather support vehicles that made the attempt to save lives. The opportunity to safely apply the brakes with enough time to avoid all casualties resides. So long as this remains a possibility, ethics based on religion would not support a vehicle programmed to swerve. Similarly, I would not want to take such a risk and would program the autonomous vehicle to remain on its predetermined

More about Essay On Self-Driving Car Swerve

Open Document