Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Value of life
Autonomous vehicles will be an element of the not-too-distant future. While legal, ethical, security and policy issues abound, automakers continue to develop autonomous technology. Many fear ceding control to new technology, but the positives are too great to pass up. Companies see the opportunity to make money and in the process save lives and make other’s lives better. Ethically speaking, autonomous vehicles impact individuals positively. People that never had the possibility of driving would now be mobile (Stenquist, 2014). Whether a person is too old to drive safely, disabled, seizure-prone or any other reason someone might be unable to drive, they will find autonomous vehicles provide them with freedom (Ramsey, 2015). If the technology …show more content…
The legal system will no longer be bogged down with traffic citations and impaired-driving legal proceedings (Zagorsky, 2015). The legal system then inherits the ability to concentrate on serious infractions of the law. It is not too difficult to imagine crime rates going down and urban areas become more livable. From the perspective of security, society will likely experience no change with the implementation of driverless cars. One may wonder how difficult it would be to hack into the technology behind autonomous vehicles. Many things are hackable. That does not mean that we avoid the implementation of innovative technology. To protect society, those in the technology business must strive to stay ahead of those who seek to break the law for personal gain. Developing laws that govern the use of driverless technology will be a hurdle that society must clear. We, as a society, must continuously develop and amend these policies. As new problems pop up, new solutions develop. The realm of technology is always changing and the laws will change with …show more content…
Autonomous vehicles will have to make real-time life and death decisions. If one reaction can cause one death, and another reaction will cause more than one, the technology will choose the smallest amount of life lost (Auto Insurance Center, 2017). What if the computer chooses to run over a child that chased a toy into the street rather than swerve into oncoming traffic risking many lives? Would we be okay with entrusting a logical and unfeeling computer program to make these kinds of decisions? Computer programs do not react emotionally, but they also do not have to live with their decisions. The people using, operating and developing the technology live with the decisions made by computers. The U.S. Department of Transportation ascribes each human life a value. That value is $9.2 million (Auto Insurance Center, 2017). This seems a rather arbitrary number. Should an 80-year-old life be valued the same as a child of only 8 years? Driverless cars ultimately save lives and money. People will enjoy the benefits of this new development in technology. While the ethics are still cloudy, the fact remains that a computer can judge dangerous situations more effectively than a person. The potential growth can only be hampered by man-kinds illogical
Now, I am very intrested in cars and I love almost every aspect of them, but did you know, that each year 1 million, people die each year from car accidents? And 81% of these accidents are caused by human error? 1 million people, gone like that. Fortunately, there's a new technology that dramastically decrease this number. This technology is self-driving cars. A self-driving car is a car that is capable of sensing its environment and navigating without human input. Currently, about 33 companies including Tesla, BMW, and Google, are working to create self-driving cars that can prevent human errors and change the way people view driving. Self-driving cars, have other benefits besides preventing human error, such as less traffic congestion, and less fuel consumption. However, with these benefits come some costs such as cyber security problems and ethical dilemmas. So, should we have self-driving cars, or not?
Imagine having your life flash before your eyes while you were still wearing diapers. And imagine having a hot hunk of metal crash into you and shatter your sense of everything. When I was just three years old, I was the victim of a very scary car accident. While waiting to make a turn into my nursery school, my mom’s car was rear-ended by a car driving at 50 miles per hour. I remember how incredibly loud the collision was and even how the windows seemed to shiver in their rubber holders. Seeing my mom's head fly back and feeling the car swerve into the opposing traffic, I thought I was going to die. And why did this happen? Because the person driving behind us was texting on her phone and was not focused on the road. All of this, the emotional, physical, and financial damage, and the possibility of losing my mom's or my own life, could have been prevented if the car behind us was a driverless car. Briefly, a driverless car is capable of driving itself via an intricate system of cameras, sensors and computers. I propose that human drivers should be replaced with driverless cars because driverless cars are safer and more efficient.
Since the advent of autonomous technology, self-driving cars have been expected to be the best solution to optimizing daily commuting efficiency meanwhile significantly reducing or even preventing traffic accidents and fatality by rectifying and removing possible human errors on the road. As the deeper research goes on, however, the ethics of driverless cars become a major concern: self-driving cars must make their own decisions at any circumstances, which also means that such vehicles must be pre-programmed to respond ethically to certain emergencies. Concerning quite broad range of ethical issues, such algorithms should be rather convoluted. Without any perfect solutions so far, social expectation of ethical principles should be a logical
While many people are all about autonomous cars and the benefits that they will bring to society, there are people who oppose driver less cars. Google has faced major censure from critics that are uneasy with the method that the automobile will u...
Are driverless cars really needed in today's society? Many people and big businesses think so. Going on a road trip? click a button, sit back relax and wait until you arrive at your destination. Many, however, are skeptical of these driverless cars, Both sides have very good reasons for their beliefs but most people believe this is going to give the government too much control.
Driverless cars have 360 degree monitoring and have the potential to save billions of dollars and thousands of lives (Brown).
Have you ever been on your way to work, and traffic holds up and tests not only your patience, but your sanity. More than likely, there was someone on the road or highway who has gotten into an accident.Now what if I were to tell you google has mass produced a vehicle that drives itself? Well, why should that interest me?, you may be asking yourself. But wouldn’t it be great if you did not need to pay compensation for an accident that was wrongfully blamed on you, because of smart computing. Or how about having a chauffeur that drives safer and more precise than any human has. If things like safety or efficiency doesn’t grasp your attention, maybe the simple fact that anyone can get in one of these cars,sleep and relax as the car drives to your destination. So now allow me to convince you why driverless cars should be allowed on roadways.
With self-driving cars on the horizon for the average consumer, an ethical dilemma is made apparent. Who is to blame in the advent of an accident involving a car that drives itself? There are many situations in which the car could make a “wrong” judgement call based off of its internal decision models. The problem occurs when the decision the car makes differs from what the average person would consider a good moral choice. A current issue relates to who is responsible for an assisted driving accident, when the car attempts to save the driver or a pedestrian, and the other issue involves self-driving cars and the responsibility of computer model decisions.
Driverless cars do hold potential in reducing the amount of accidents on the road. One article states that human mistakes make up more than 90 percent of car accidents and that no matter what problems the autonomous vehicle (AV) possesses, it will still reduce this percentage (Ackerman 3). Humans sometimes make blunders that create an accident
Self-driving cars are the wave of the future. There is much debate regarding the impact a self-driving car will have on our society and economy. Some experts believe fully autonomous vehicles will be on the road in the next 5-10 years (Anderson). This means a vehicle will be able to drive on the road without a driver or any passengers. Like any groundbreaking technology, there is a fear of the unforeseen problems. Therefore, there will need to be extensive testing before anyone can feel safe with a vehicle of this style on the road. It will also take time for this type of technology to become financially accessible to the masses, but again alike any technology with time it should be possible. Once the safety concern has been fully addressed
Inventors hope to help people with autonomous cars because “autonomous cars can do things that human drivers can’t” (qtd. in “Making Robot Cars More Human). One of the advantages that driverless cars have is that “They can see through fog or other inclement weather, and sense a stalled car or other hazard ahead and take appropriate action” (qtd. in “Making Robot Cars More Human). Harsh weather conditions make it difficult and dangerous for people to drive, however, the car’s ability to drive through inclement weather “frees the user’s time, creates opportunities for individuals with less mobility, and increases overall road safety” (Bose 1326). With all the technology and software in the car, it can “improve road traffic system[s] and reduces road accidents” (Kumar). One of the purposes for creating the driverless car was to help “make lives easier for senior citizens, people with disabilities, people who are ill, or people who are under influence of alcohol” (Kumar). It can be frightening to know that that we share share our roads with drivers that could potentially endanger our lives as well as other people’s lives. How can people not feel a sense of worry when “cars kill roughly 32,000 people a year in the U.S.” (Fisher 60)? Drivers who text while driving or drink and drive greatly impact the safety of other people, and Google hopes to reduces the risk of accidents and save lives with the
First, driverless cars cannot currently function in extreme weather such as snow. Thompson points out in his article, “No Parking Here” that this limitation makes it unlikely that they will pass safety standards in various regions of the United States and around the world (Thompson 22). Additionally, the advent of autonomous cars will have significant economic ramifications because, as noted by Biba in his article “Carmageddon,” this transition will displace almost all driving related occupations. Despite the massive scale of such a displacement, Biba contends that its consequences are still “unclear” and its exact implications will remain unknown until its occurrence (Biba 31). Another commonly held concern is that self-driving cars will be used to collect data on passengers’ transportation habits that will be sold to advertising companies. The Trends E-Magazine article “Driverless Cars: Coming to Your Streets Sooner Than You Think,” comments on this concern, specifying that passengers will need to accept “giving up some privacy in exchange for convenience” (Trends E-Magazine
The self-driving car would cause many people to lose their jobs. The careers that would no longer be needed due to the self-driving car include but are not limited to those who drill oil, taxi drivers, and personal injury lawyers. If self-driving cars were electric, oil drillers would be needed less and a majority could lose their jobs. If there’s self-driving cars, there could easily be a self-driving taxi service. If self-driving cars reduce accidents a majority of personal injury lawyers’ business would disappear. Also the gasoline industry would suffer, affecting stockholders, and there would be no need for drivers’ education
Automotive executives touting self-driving cars as a way to make commuting more productive or relaxing may want to consider another potential marketing pitch: safety (Hirschauge, 2016). The biggest reason why these cars will make a safer world is that accident rates will enormously drop. There is a lot of bad behavior a driver exhibit behind the wheel, and a computer is actually an ideal motorist. Since 81 percent of car crashes are the result of human error, computers would take a lot of danger out of the equation entirely. Also, some of the major causes of accidents are drivers who become ill at the time of driving. Some of the examples of this would be a seizure, heart attack, diabetic reactions, fainting, and high or low blood pressure. Autonomous cars will surely remedy these types of occurrences making us
Many feel that driverless cars are the future of the automobile industry. When someone hears “Robot cars hitting the road soon” is that a guarantee that the roads will still remain safe? With the rapid growth of technology through the centuries, more specifically computer software, the issue arises of whether or not roads and other drivers will be safe behind the wheel. Currently there is very little knowledge on how driverless cars will be engineered, which brings concerns to peoples eyes. Subsequently, driverless cars can be prone to hacking, which leads to out of control situations for drivers behind the wheel.