Essay On Hall Of Fame

869 Words2 Pages

People overlook many things while determining whether players should be inducted into the Hall of Fame. There are many that deserve it more that others and there are some that do not deserve that it at all. Players are usually determined more on their numbers of statistics. Doesn’t it feel awful to be overlooked or underrated? Well, players should be recognized by their statistics, strategy, and their style – not by how many titles or games they have won. There is a saying that says you can’t win for losing but that winner might not be as good as the loser might be. On that note, players are imminent to become a hall of famer or inducted into the hall of fame should be recognized only by their statistics, awards, and their style or innovation of the game Unfortunately, many pro athletes that haven’t done too much in their careers are likely to be inducted into the hall of fame simply because how fan react to some remarkable actions that are, in reality, only an illusion. Former New York Jets quarterback, Joe Namath, was inducted into the NFL Hall of Fame in 1985. …show more content…

However, it’s not just about exactly what was won but how many awards of that category as well. Many pay too much attention to what her player does on the field rather than read about it. There are many players that have won championships but there some that have only done it one time and had been inducted in the Hall of Fame. For example, should Wilt Chamberlin be inducted in the Hall of Fame? He was the only person that was seven feet at his time. Not to mention, he only had one 100 point game as well as only two championships. There are same people that do not even get that, but couldn’t that just be luck? Players like this do not deserve to be into the Hall of Fame and unfortunately there are many like this. Despite all of the one-time awards, one award should not get a pro athlete everything or at least something this

Open Document