Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of doping of athletes in sports
Performance enhancing drugs and their effect on the athlete
Decriminalization of drugs and its effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of doping of athletes in sports
Nearly eleven percent of employed Americans have reported using illicit drugs in the last month. Illicit drugs include but are not limited to: marijuana, heroine, cocaine, and meth. Drug testing should be mandatory in sports and in the workplace. Performance enhancing drugs give an unfair advantage in sports, and illicit drugs may result in on the job accidents, and if an individual tests positive they should be faced with increased punishments. Drug testing should take place regularly in sports because Performence Enhancing Drugs give the user an unfair advantage over the rest of the playing field. (Shermer)Using drugs in sports commonly referred to as “doping” it is the deliberate act of taking controlled substances to increase ones potential, or overall ability. (Shermer) You can't detect most of these drugs …show more content…
If an employer tests all of their employees and some of them test positive for using drugs the employer could “weed out” these employees due to the fact that they could be much less productive, safe, and efficient as an employee who is “clean” so to speak of using these drugs. (Why Drug Test) If a individual tests positive they could have many different actions taken against them, depending on where they were tested. (Why Drug Test) Whether it be in the workplace or a test administered by coaches, or athletic officials. They could lose their job due to the fact that they just won't perform to the same standards as another employee that wouldn't test positive. The clean employee would be less susceptible to on the job accidents and many other complications. (Why Drug Test)In sports they could lose championships,eligibility, and their reputation to many of their fans and supporters. NCAA athletes lose twenty-five percent of their total eligibility if they test positive for any controlled substances. In varsity sports or other organized sports they can get suspended or even banned.
“It 's important that athletes can compete on a level playing field. And youngsters coming into the sport can know that if they are working hard and training hard, they 'll see a true reflection of where they stand and what they can achieve worldwide and not be swayed by people who are cheating.” This was said by Paula Jane Radcliffe, a long-distance runner and Olympian. Cheating in sports is considered to be immoral. In sports there are many different forms of cheating. Whether it is illegal taping, bribes, or foul play, it is never the way to go. Undoubtedly the most extreme and controversial form of cheating is through the use of PEDs, better known as Performance Enhancing Drugs. There are many different types of Performance Enhancing Drugs. The two most popular being anabolic steroids and
Doping is the use of illegal substances that is harmful to athlete's health and is capable of enhancing performance. Doping also refers to the presence of drugs in the athlete's blood or urine. So, doping in other words is cheating and can be detrimental to the individual reputation and the sport. There are two types of doping blood and chemical. Blood doping is when drugs are placed into red blood cells, oxygen carriers, and related blood products to enhance an athlete's performance (1 Anonymous). Effects of blood doping include kidney damage, allergic reactions, and blood clots (1Anonymous). Chemical doping refers to attempts to change samples used in drug testing (1Anonymous). Despite the many risks the use of drugs among athletes is still prevalent.
Each day, professional and amateur athletes and body builders thrive to achieve their goals and dreams of winning gold medals or representing their country worldwide. The sports or games in which they participate require physical strength, athleticism and stamina, and due to the tough competition they face, some of these athletes decide to take performance enhancing drugs, an act called doping.
Drug testing is designed to detect and punish conduct that is usually engaged on-duty and off the employer's premises - that is, in private. Employers who conduct random drug tests on workers who are not suspected of using drugs are policing private behavior that has no impact on job performance. Someone may test positive after taking a drug days, weeks or months before. People are not generally required to organize their lives to maximize their productivity at work, and employers do not have a direct law enforcement function.... ...
Not drug testing student athletes will affect the relationships that the student athlete has with others. The team that the athlete is on will be one of the largest groups of relationships that will be affected. Being on a team is like a family and a family requires teamwork. Family and teamwork requires every member to work together and get along. Younger athletes on the team look up to the older members of the team or the captains. “Many of these younger students revere the senior football player or want to be like that star sophomore on the soccer field,” (More Schools Should Drug-test Athletes). If these athletes are setting the example by doing drugs and playing sports, then the younger players will most likely pursue in their role models footsteps. Likewise, taking drugs during the season is prohibited, so if someone on the team is using drugs they will probably not advise the coach or other team members. This will lead to lying to others. and then later hurting the team. Fights and distrust among team member...
There are two ways people can be tested: urine and blood samples that will then be sent to a lab (“Olympic Games”). If the person being tested gets her or his positive results back there will be many consequences to follow. In a public high school, if one tests positive for steroid use he or she experiences the following consequences: suspension from activities for eight weeks, they must receive counseling, parents have to be contacted, and then they have to test negative on all other random drug tests given. In a private high school, if one tests positive for steroid use he or she experiences the following: meeting with parents and school administration, take a second drug test, and if they test positive on that one as well, they get taken out of the school and it goes on their record (Stinchcomb). Of course, people have come up with ways to try and trick the drug tests, and sometimes it does work. There are three ways that people try to trick the tests: tampering, which means people put household products in their urine to try to make it harder to detect the steroids, water loading, which is drinking tons and tons of water to water down the drugs and try to flush them out of their system, and finally, popping vitamins, which flushes out the toxins in their bodies
Some high schools require athletes to submit to random chemical testing for illegal drug use. On the other hand, other schools and coaches believe that random drug testing is stating that all athletes are guilty of wrongdoing instead of believing they are innocent. There can be advantages and disadvantages to both sides, although random chemical testing for illegal drug use is the smartest idea. Having random drug tests is used for precautions, influences some to not do drugs if they are considering it, and encourages students to be their best.
“A medical dictionary defines a drug as ‘any substance that when taken into the living organism may modify one or more of its functions’” (Newton 12). However, when speaking of drug testing for abuse a person is usually thinking about illegal drugs or drugs that can alter athletic performance in sporting events. Mandatory drug testing was not allowed in public schools until June 2002 when the Supreme Court allowed for public schools to do random drug testing (Carroll 23). This decision allowed for drug testing in all schools throughout the United States not just for athletes but also students who are in any activities within the school, for example clubs and competitive events (Carroll 23). Even though drug testing is now allowed by the Supreme Court many schools do not yet have mandatory drug test policies. Mandatory drug testing for high school athletes should be required because it decreases drug use in schools, is relatively inexpensive, and can prevent drug use and or abuse that can lead to a lifelong addiction.
The ethics of drug testing has become an increased concern for many companies in the recent years. More companies are beginning to use it and more people are starting more to have problems with it. The tests are now more than ever seen as a way to stop the problems of drug abuse in the workplace. This brings up a very large question. Is drug testing an ethical way to decide employee drug use? It is also very hard to decide if the test is an invasion of employee privacy. “The ethical status of workplace drug testing can be expressed as a question of competing interests, between the employer’s right to use testing to reduce drug related harms and maximize profits, over against the employee’s right to privacy, particularly with regard to drug use which occurs outside the workplace.” (Cranford 2) The rights of the employee have to be considered. The Supreme Court case, Griswold vs. Connecticut outlines the idea that every person is entitled to a privacy zone. However this definition covers privacy and protection from government. To work productively especially when the work may be physical it is nearly impossible to keep one’s privacy. The relationship between employer and employee is based on a contract. The employee provides work for the employer and in return he is paid. If the employee cannot provide services because of problems such as drug abuse, then he is violating the contract. Employers have the right to know many things about their employees.
The debate over the legalization of performance-enhancing drugs, also known as PEDs, has been on the rise. Performance enhancing drugs are the illegal drugs or substances that are taken by athletes to improve their performance. The term doping is used to describe the act of using PEDs. In the recent years, many famous athletes have been convicted of PED abuse. Among these famous athletes is Lance Armstrong, a famous cyclist who won multiple Tour de France titles.
When employees get hired, they get a drug test due to the fact that the drug testing can prove if the person they are hiring is a good person for their business. For an example “Approximately eighty-one percent of companies in the United States administer drug testing to their employees.” Drug testing also proves that people who passes it are clean and responsible people who the company can trust on doing their job well done and showing overall percentage of the US using drug testing (Chodorow). People who cheat on a drug test and gets a job will later ruin their job of getting into accidents during working and or start a fight with the boss or coworkers unknowingly just because they were high on drugs. That is why companies strive to do drug tests every time they hire an employee now due to the fact that they don’t want to be reliable for an employee who isn’t responsible and trustworthy of their time at their company. Which it will affect the company financially once employees gets hurt on their job. An employee who is not a drug abuser can really benefit a company by not causing trouble for themselves getting hurt in the company and also the business not being reliable for anything that is caused by the employee; who was not responsible. Another example is that reports confirm that 80% of those injured in “serious drug related accidents are innocent coworkers.” And after it began requiring accidents drug
Drug use has led to an increased number of deaths and suspensions of athletes. Also, if this continues, all athletes someday will have to choose whether to compete at a world-class level and take drugs, or compete at a club level and be clean. In sports, athletes, coaches and trainers will try their best to find a way to reach the top level. They not only search for a way to enhance performance, but most of them have aspiring Olympians to train.... ...
Doping can be strictly defined as the consumption of any substance (whether food or drug) to improve one's performance. This definition can be applied in a variety of situations, from college students drinking coffee in order to stay awake to athletes who take steroids to make them stronger. The problem with doping is where one draws the line. The drugs used in doping often have detrimental effects to one's health, both mental and physical. In the short run these drugs improve one's performance, but in the long run they can kill.
Drug use in sports is considered cheating. Doping has many historical backgrounds, but now it is on a larger scale in order to maximiz...
To cheat is to act dishonestly or unfairly in order to gain an advantage. The use of performance –enhancing drugs in sports is morally wrong due to the fact that it is only a sign of cheating, impacts the future generation, and is deceiving to fellow audience. This goes against all the things sport fans theorize from athletes. People expect to see the individuals perform with the best of their abilities. It is what makes watching sports more interesting and creates competition. Performance enhancing drugs in sport should not be tolerated and should be illegal because it eliminates competition.