Epicurus Paradox

1070 Words3 Pages

Throughout the span of human existence, we have continually possed certain vices. The vice labeled as Evil, is the most nebulous of these. Not only do humans have problems with evil, so do supernatural deities such as God. Religion has faced several strides since its infancy, yet none is more strenuous to solve then the Problem of Evil. The problem of Evil occurs when there is a deity that is omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient. Although the deity has these formidable traits, there is still evil in world. This is a paradox, so we must ask ourselves does that deity truly have those powers? Some might claim we might have to bite the bullet one of the “trinity” Epicurus was an ancient greek philosopher who constructed the Epicurean Paradox. This paradox starts with the premise that God is omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient.
“If God is willing to prevent Evil, but not able. Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?” …show more content…

There have been several approaches to solve this problem. The Theist might claim that there is evil in the world in order to bring a greater good, but J.L Mackie in Evil and Omnipotence meticulously displays why that theodicy is faulty. Mackie asserts God cannot claim omnipotence and be unable to create a universe containing moral good while simultaneously lacking moral evil. Alvin Plantinga brings forth a formidable theodicy, called the The Free Will Defense. Plantinga asserts that God created us with free will so consequently it is not within the sphere of omipotentness to bind the will of an inherently free creature. I, shall be writing nor about Mackie or Plantinga but rather the erroneous assumptions entangled in

Open Document