John Hick And Richard Swinburne: The Problem Of Evil Argument

1651 Words4 Pages

Throughout the world, most people believe in some type of god or gods, and the majority of them understand God as all-good, all-knowing (omniscient), and all-powerful (omnipotent). However, there is a major objection to the latter belief: the “problem of evil” (P.O.E.) argument. According to this theory, God’s existence is unlikely, if not illogical, because a good, omniscient, and omnipotent being would not allow unnecessary suffering, of which there are enormous amounts. In this paper, I will use the writings of John Hick and Richard Swinburne to dispute the problem of evil argument. After I first elaborate on the P.O.E., I will give support for God’s existence with regards to the problem of evil. Then, I will address further counterarguments …show more content…

This thesis is shown by John Hick in his article Evil and Soul-Making. As Hick explains, humans already exist in God’s image but have “not yet been formed into the finite likeness of God . . . Man is in the process of becoming the perfected being whom God is seeking to create. However, this is not taking place – it is important to add – by a natural and inevitable evolution, but through a hazardous adventure in individual freedom . . . this involves an accumulation of evil as well as good” (Hick 1-2). In other words, humanity is slowly progressing toward a world in which evil does not exist, as implied by the term “finite likeness of God,” but in order to reach that state, we must first deal with acts of evil, in order to learn what good truly is. On a personal level, this is known as soul-builder …show more content…

Given my first argument about the good, pleasurable feeling that comes from acting responsibly, this statement probably seems pretty contradictory. However, feel-good experiences serve large purposes than just increasing dopamine levels; they also encourage responsible behavior. In his article Evil and Soul-Making, John Hick uses the metaphor of parenting to show how God is leading humanity to act responsibly. “A parent who loves his children and wants them to become the best human beings they are capable of becoming does not treat pleasure as the sole and supreme value,” he says, “. . . a child brought up on [this principle] would not likely become an ethically mature adult or an attractive or happy personality” (Hick 3). Similarly, Hicks suggests that as the “children of God,” we are given the opportunity to act irresponsibly and have to endure suffering in order to learn responsibility, which God encourages through feel-good experiences (Hick

Open Document