Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep Essay

1183 Words3 Pages

In Philip K. Dick’s novel, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, PKD elaborates upon the existences of social elitism and consumerism that commodify animals. PKD uses the protagonist Rick Deckard to examine the impact of superficiality on society, including the unifying factor of social-conditioning that a higher social status signifies greater empathic capacity. In Androids, Earth has been decimated by a world war, killing almost every animal and creating a high demand for the ones that survived. Owning an animal evolved into a social necessity, since maintaining and caring for the animal connoted empathy. The rarer the animal, the higher the price, the subsequent social status, and the empathy. Therefore, the abundance of cheaper, electric animals flourished as a means to appease others. At the beginning of the novel, Deckard owns an electric sheep and remains dissatisfied, but various encounters with different animals, including …show more content…

PKD uses Sidney’s Catalogue as a function of further deepening in social order for Deckard, as Jill Galvan says, “the high rate of interest compels him to continue bounty hunting” (Galvan). Deckard’s inclination to continue bounty hunting to purchase more expensive, rare animals serves as a further commodification of animals, and proof of a transactional relationship rather than an empathic one. In theory, the purpose of owning an animal is “to participate in an ethic of care for precious living beings,” but commodification corrupts the purpose, so the real point “in owning an artificial animal is… to demonstrate to your neighbours that you have the capital to own an animal” (Vint). Due to the commodity relationship outweighing the spiritual relationship, the ability to connect with one’s animal is hindered and is the reason why Deckard is dissatisfied with his electric

Open Document