Difference Between Greece And Hellenistic Cities

512 Words2 Pages

The movement from parochial Hellenic to cosmopolitan Hellenistic represents the move from a culture controlled by ethnic Greeks to a culture dominated by Greek-speakers of any ethnicity. They went from the political strength of the city-state to that of larger monarchies. Hellenic Greece refers to the people who lived in classical Greece before Alexander the Great's death. Greeks were isolated and their civilization was considered classic because it was not seriously influenced by outside forces. Hellenistic refers to Greeks and others who lived during the period after Alexander's conquests. They differ from Hellenic in territory, culture, and political systems.
Hellenistic cities were very large by Hellenic standards. They did contain the same public features as the polis. The economy produced large operations and more up-to-date financial systems. New crops and agricultural techniques were also introduced into the ruled areas. However, these changes increased difference between the rich and poor. This caused major social conflict. The international language became Koine. Hellenistic cities were also cosmopolitan. The lifestyle became private, compared to the public lifestyle of the polis. …show more content…

The library at Alexandria contained over 1 million books, as well as scientific research facilities. Philosophy started to change and was very different as well. Classical philosophy was worried about the Greeks relationship to the polis. The relationship changed drastically with the establishment of the Hellenistic kingdoms. Hellenistic philosophy also tried to deal with the new idea of Epicureanism. Epicureanism taught that happiness could be achieved through the pursuit of pleasure. Epicureanism was overshadowed by Stoicism. Stoicism taught that happiness could be obtained by accepting one’s lot and living in harmony with the well of God, thereby achieving inner

Open Document