Understanding Dawkins' Controversial 'Selfish Gene' Theory

697 Words2 Pages

Dawkins and the Selfish Gene: A Summary

Richard Dawkins, an English evolutionary biologist and writer, is well known for his book The Selfish Gene. Published in 1967, his book provides a distinct view on the process of natural selection. Dawkins’ controversial selfish gene theory focuses on genes as the basis for evolution. It has received much criticism, however it contributed to a new way of viewing evolution based on genes. In Dawkins and the Selfish Gene, Ed Sexton provides an explanation for Dawkins’ commonly misinterpreted gene theory.
First, he establishes the concept of selfish genes with analogies to the functions of physical things, such as human beings. “The fundamental unit of evolution is the replicator…anything which can be …show more content…

In this sense, the parenting gene may risk or give up something to allow for more success of the offspring replicated gene. He compares this behavior to parenting, expressing how parents take risks in order to help protect their child. Altruism occurs between related and unrelated species, and the connection lies behind cooperation that will allow one or both parties to reap rewards. This concept is tied to the concept of the prisoner’s dilemma; where in cooperation, two individuals receive shorter sentences in prison, but if one acts selfishly, he receives reduced time and the other more time. In nature, the Tit-for-Tat strategy – where something is given in return for something received – reveals cooperation. And in these examples, Sexton illustrates Dawkins’ theory.
Opposing views to this theory include the idea that nature cannot directly affect genes, but instead their vehicles, our bodies and other organisms. Though, genes influence behavior of organisms and their environment. Sexton states: “Selection will act on entity that exists long enough for its frequency in the population to be changed.” He corresponds a gene with a behavior, then a trait, and to an organism, then questioning if it is not right to look at selection from a broader point, including more than just

Open Document