Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Issue of corporal punishment
Issue of corporal punishment
Corporal punishment is the use of
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Issue of corporal punishment
Commonly thought within society and within the laws of Australia that to instill discipline and obedience particularly in children, parents feel justified in the use of corporal punishment. Corporal punishment, also known as physical discipline, is the act of physical force towards a child for the sole purpose of disciplinary control and/or correction (Holzer & Lamont 2010). It is used with the intention to cause pain and discomfort to the body of a child, however mild (Holzer & Lamont 2010). The laws surrounding the rights of practicing corporal punishment ultimately breachs the child’s rights in regards to their personal physical and emotional wellbeing. Currently parents can raise the defence of reasonable chastisement. The defence of
Punishment occurs to individuals who break the law. It is also used to maintain the level of crime and to protect community members in Australia. To determine that society is content with maintaining the crime rate, this essay will discuss punishment types given to offenders and how society justifies the use punishment. Additionally, providing a brief overview of the community correction and prions rates to show that communities prefer to incarcerate lawbreakers. Highlighting that crime rates are being maintained by looking at the personal crime rate for assault before concluding that Australian society feel safe enough to allow the criminal justice system to sustain the crime rate.
Children are like flowers, if well taken care of they will glow. If ignored or tortured, they will damage or die. Child discipline is one of the most significant basics of successful parenting. Today, many people have this belief that physical abuse is in no way a solution to helping children recognize between right and wrong. Since generations children have been learnt the art of discipline through physical punishment. Often this approach to disciplining has resulted in two consequences, one is where the child becomes more generous and is able to obey what he or she has been stated, or the other which more often results in children developing a sense of suffering and wish to revolution. I believe that sometimes parents are caught in a situation when children annoyed all boundaries of discipline and spanking is the only actual answer. Therefore, it is essential to do spanking for child discipline since it is the important element of successful parenting.
"All people have the right to protection of their physical integrity, and children are people too”(Hunt). Children are physically punished to correct their negative behaviors; however, there has been a dispute about whether or not it is acceptable for parents to spank their children as a form of punishment since children have the same rights to be respected like adults. Most adults would argue that it is acceptable for parents to physically punish their children with spanking because there are benefits to discipling children using this method, but even though the opposing argument is valid, spanking children as punishment has long term effects that can negatively change the child’s behavior. Documentation presents reasons why it is not okay for parents to spank their children as the only form of punishment.
If your family is like 90% of the population, then you have been disciplined using corporal punishment or have discipled your children with it. The topic of whether parents should use corporal punishment has been debated for years, and it is illegal in the United States to use physical punishment; however, each state’s law on corporal punishment varies and all allow some form of physical punishment. New studies greatly question whether corporal punishment should be used when discipling children. Parents or guardians should not be allowed to use corporal punishment because it causes anti-social behavior, it increases aggression, and it causes cognitive problems.
Dear Sir, I am writing in reply to the recent publication of an item on the topic of corporal punishment. I do not agree that it is needed to bring discipline back into our schools. It is assumed that a child who has been caned would be less likely to commit another offence , but this was never proved and , in fact , one theory holds that severe corporal punishment increases the likelihood of future offences. There are better ways to discipline students than hitting them. Some parents may believe that spanking a child may be beneficial but apart from being potentially dangerous physically, it can lower their self esteem, hinder their academic abilities and may even contribute to disruptive and violent behaviour. Some pupils may feel so afraid to go to school that they are tempted to play truant. Over the past few years we have become more and more obsessive over bringing our lives into the twenty first century and now , here you are telling us that we should bring back corporal punishment, a system which is looked upon as old fashioned ! Discipline should begin in the home . Parents have and should accept the task of instilling in their children respect for right and wrong, respect for others and all the other basic lessons of living, working, playing and learning with others. They should try to teach him to control himself and take responsibility for his actions and their consequences .Unfortunately, because some parents find it difficult to do this from infancy , the teachers role is all the more difficult. Still, restoring this rule is not the way to resolve theses difficulties. Get to children in infancy and their early years and their lives will be shaped more fully for future growth. Restoring their teachers’ power to hit them across the bottom or knuckles doesn’t fit that picture. Forget corporal punishment. Roald Dahl’s book entitled “Boy” tells about the times when corporal punishment was allowed to take place in all schools. A passage from the book tells of how , aged nine, Dahl was caned six times for talking during prep. Even though he had had a perfectly good excuse he got the same punishment another child would probably have got for defacing school property or stealing. I think that this reinforces my earlier suggestion that teachers may take advantage of their authority and harass pupils they may have taken a dislike to.
Hicks-Pass, S. (2009). Corporal Punishment in America Today: Spare the rod, spoil the child? A systematic review of the literature. Best Practice in Mental Health, 5(2), 71-88. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.lib.kaplan.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=93cflaef-aec5-458d-95f1-a1bd4631f607%40sessionmgr4005&hid=4208&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#AN=42857541&db=a9h
Corporal punishment has been a part of family life for thousands of years, taking its place in societies all over the globe. From wood switches to thick leather belts, all sorts of tools have been used to discipline naughty children. No one has ever really examined the question of whether or not this form of punishment is productive or counterproductive. In examining the situation of whether or not this form of punishment is warranted or even what one might consider proper, a sample situation must be examined. Let’s say, for argument’s sake that a little boy named Johnny just threw a temper tantrum and threw his bowl of Coco CrispiesÓ all over the kitchen floor. Now there are two things his mother could do at this point to correct him. She could either use corporal punishment, taking it’s form in nearly abusive words or a few backhand’s across his face, or she could simply have a talk with him and explain why his behavior was wrong and why he should not do it again. Now which one would accomplish more? Obviously, simply talking to little Johnny would ac...
Corporal punishment is a controversial form of physical punishment used to deter crime or unsavory behavior. It was often used in the past, but is now discouraged or even seen as immoral, at least in Western countries. Corporal punishment is a morally unjust way to get students to act in an acceptable behavior.
Hyman (1989) says corporal punishment refers to intentional application of physical pain as a method of changing behavior. It includes a wide variety of methods such as hitting, slapping, punching, kicking, pinching, shaking, choking, use of various objects (wooden paddles, belts, sticks, pins, or others), painful body postures, use of electric shock, use of excessive exercise drills, or prevention of urine or stool limination (p.161).
The act of physical punishment such as spanking is defined as physical force used to cause momentary pain, but not to cause injury to a child in order to control or correct negative behavior(Straus, 2000 as cited by Rodriguez, 2010). Because physical punishment involves physical force by a parent, who is much larger and stronger, the potential to cause injury to a child is high; even when a parent does not intend for such to happen (Gershoff, 2010).
In South Africa it is still legal for parents to make use of corporal punishment in order to discipline their children. The reason therefore is that a defence exists in South African common-law for parents when a claim based on assault is raised. This defence is known as reasonable disciplinary chastisement and it is seen as ‘n ground of justification. Physical assault, such as corporal chastisement is seen as unlawful. In the following discussion current legislation on the subject, world views and the interpretation of the Constitution will be examined to determine whether or not this defence has a future in South African law.
Corporal and children punishment is the form of punishment which can include beating, branding, blinding, flogging and other physical pain to restrict unbearable behavior and reforming wrongdoer. Corporal punishment can be judicial corporal punishment, school corporal punishment and domestic corporal punishment. The effects of corporal punishment against children cannot be ignored. In most of the developed nations corporal punishments do not exists (Soneson, 2005). Despite corporal and children are adopted by some families to restrict their children for doing any unnecessary activity but the negative impact cannot be impact. The negative impact of corporal punishment moves beyond its advantages.Families often implement corporal and children punishment to teach their children lesson about any wrongdoings. But punishment can hardly teach children lessons as it can influence to violent behaviors from children (Bitensky, 2006). National surveys reveals that the methods that are used in United States such as pulling ears, shaking, kicking, swatting, pinching, using hair brushes and belts to stop children from doing any unwanted behavior. These methods are applied to the children who are less than 8 years of age (Hunt, 2001). Another survey show that 35% of the parents agree to implement any one or two strategies to babies who are one year old. For some of the parents the applications of these punishments arecruel which lead them to apply suitable punishment to children which would help to change the mentality and any wrong doings (Glenn, 2001). According the data release in United States, it is been revealed that more than 223,190 students are subject to physical punishment from faculties or teachers in the year 2005-2006 (Tunner, 20...
Corporal punishment defined by psychologists is physical force that inflicts pain without injury for correctional purposes (Donnelly) but children between the ages of four to twelve define it very differently. To them, it is the cane, the belt and the raised hand which has taught them discipline and fear. To them, it is the scars and the bruises which have become reminders of their wrong doings. To them, it is the measure taken by their parents to form the “model citizen”. With the well-being and moral internalization of these children as the top priority, many people have spoken against this practice and a few governments outlawing it. Nonetheless, the fight to ban domestic corporal punishment is not over on the grounds of which it can lead to abuse, is an ineffective form of correctional education and inhibits child development.
There is a controversy between corporal punishment and child abuse. Many people are left with the question, where does it draw the line? When does corporal punishment become child abuse? Each parent has different parenting ways and different ways in instilling discipline in their household. Some parents believe that the use of corporal punishment is necessary to instill discipline and moral to their child or children while others believe that it is considered child abuse. Corporal punishment becomes child abuse when it becomes disruptive and excessive to the point where it causes physical and emotional injuries to a child. The definition of corporal punishment and abuse needs to be clearly defined to avoid the misconception and confusion.
Corporal punishment makes many students feel helpless and humiliated, especially if the corporal punishment is administered publicly. Imagine if you were viciously spanked for simply being late to class or forgetting to do an assignment, and you got horrible marks and bruises from it which throbbed every time you sat down, bent over or reached out to grab things. It would hurt you even more if the discipline was administered in front of a lot of students, who are snickering or whispering about you behind your back. Corporal punishment also makes many students frustrated and angry. Additionally, it degrades the students’ self-esteem. According to “Corporal Punishment of Children in US Public Schools,” an article that was written by the Human Rights Watch, “Some students become depressed or withdrawn, while others become immune to the incessant violence, accepting it as a part of their daily lives.” Studies have shown that frequently