Conodoguinet Creek Pollution

457 Words1 Page

Yesterday morning, my classmates and I went to the conodoguinet creek. We went to the creek to find out if there is pollution in the water. We took 3 tests to find out if the water was polluted or not.

My first experiment was on a critter count. The critter count involved us to take rocks out of the creek and count all the critters that are on the rocks we find. If we find a lot of group 1 critters, critters that can’t be by pollution, then the waters aren’t polluted. If we find a lot of group 3 critters, critters that can be by pollution, then the waters are polluted. Group 2 critters are critters that can be in both, but not a lot of pollution. My group and I found lots of group 1 critters(63) which was a good sign. We also found 26 group 2 critters, so the water was polluted, but not by a lot. We found 13 group 3 critters, so we know now that the water is slightly polluted, but it is still clean. …show more content…

Pennsylvania has the most acid rain in the country, so it is not a surprise if the creek was polluted, but it’s not. It could be because of limestone rocks, or rocks that neutralize pollution in waters. Are next experiment was a eutrophication Test. A eutrophication is an enrichment of an ecosystem with chemical nutrients typically compounds containing nitrogen, phosphorus, or both. In this test we took samples of water into clear measurable tubes. There is 3 things we tested with water, Phosphate, nitrate, and dissolved oxygen. Phosphates and nitrates are examples of polyatomic ion. Phosphates and nitrates are found in fertilizers and some detergents. We tested for them and we didn’t get big results, so we know that waters aren’t polluted. There was a lot of dissolved oxygen, which is good, because that is what fish need to

Open Document