Connidis And Mcmullin: Article Analysis

162 Words1 Page

Ingrid Connidis and Julia McMullin argue that ambivalence must be reconceptualized to help get a better understanding of family relationships. Connidis and McMullin’s main argument is that ambivalence is created by conflicts attached in sets of structured social relationships that clash with one's attempt to test individual's influence in relationships. How does the author conceptually develop his or her argument? Connidis and McMullin report four components of their critical theory in order to analyze how sociological ambivalence appear. First Connidis and McMullin argue that ambivalence is best conceptualized as a feature of structured sets of social relationships that include class, gender, age, race, and ethnicity. Second, they argue

Open Document