Compare And Contrast The Hindu Caste System

679 Words2 Pages

The social structures of the Hindu caste system, The Bantu peoples of Africa and medieval Europe differ greatly in their social structure. The role of top class of three systems are different as well. However, there are also similarities in the way that medieval Europe and India treat lower class people. The Hindu caste system had four major classes which they gave different names based on their creators’ body parts, the Bantu people only had one ruling class, while the medieval Europeans had three classes which they called estates. Hindu tradition relates that the system of castes to different body parts of the creator god Brahma. On the top is Brahmin, or priests, then warriors (of the Kshatriya class), traders (of the Vaishya class) and laborers (of the Sudra class). The early Bantu social structure is simply based on kinship due to the low population, usually the higher status will bring higher power to the family, the man of the most prominent family would become the chief. As the population grows more complex political system was formed and the idea hierarchy was …show more content…

For example the lowest class of caste system is the Shudras, as Rigveda described, they were emerged from the feet of Brahma, mostly consisted of workers and peasants, Shudras were forbidden to touch people of upper classes and their jobs were considered the dirtiest and most disliked. There’s basically no social mobility for Shudras which means if a person was born a Shudra, he is very likely to spend his whole life being his role and interacting with people of the same class. The same goes peasants during medieval Europe. Adalberon, the bishop of Laon described peasants as an “unfortunate group possesses nothing without suffering”, indeed, they were require to work very hard on the lands that do not belong to them and most of their agricultural production would be taken away by their

Open Document