The dimensions of culture came as a result of a research conducted by Greet Hofstede. The study investigated how culture in a workplace can be influenced by values of the people. In his view, culture is defined as the collective programming of the human brain that helps in distinguishing a group from another one. Moreover, the programming of the human mind influences the patterns, values and perspectives that define a certain community or nation. Hofstede developed a model of the national culture that is made of six dimensions. In addition to that, the cultural dimensions demonstrate the personal preferences on affairs that can be easily distinguished from that of individuals from another nation. Using the model, it is easy to identify systematic differences between the selected nations in terms of values (Hofstede). This paper discusses the cultural dimensions to compare the United States of America and China. The dimensions include Power Distance, Masculinity versus Femininity, Uncertainty Avoidance Index, and Individualism versus collectivism, Indulgence versus Restraint and long-term orientation versus short term normative orientation.
The discussion and information were provided by 22 seniors managers which is 17 males and 5 females were employed at multinational corporations in China. This discussion also included 10 western, 4 Chinese and 1 Far East multinational companies. This study is discuss on the cultural value...
There is not one universally accepted definition of culture; a number of key cultural concepts and debates are needed to clarify this term. Chinese culture is considered to be different in many ways from that of the West (Carlisle and Flynn, 2005; Buckley, Clegg and Tan2006; Tung, 1986). Kwon (2012) argued that Asian culture involves Confucian dynamism, collectivism and high institutional orientation. This suggests that the nation encourages group performance and reward, and people feel pride and loyalty towards their organisations and families. Similarly, Anderson and Lee (2008) draw attention to the Confucian value which remains relevant in our day. Fan (2002) claims that Chinese business culture can be character...
Understanding a country’s culture is critical to success as business is conducted on a global scale. Each country has its own culture or shared beliefs, values, and customs that shape their behaviors. Despite how influential as organizational culture may be managerial practices, the country’s culture may be even more influential. Geert Hofstede created what he called cultural dimensions to help managers understand the differences in cultures. His research showed that culture impacts employees’ work-related behaviors and attitudes (Robbins and Coulter, 2002). Those five dimensions are: power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism, masculinity, and time orientation (Grewel and Levy, 2013; Javidan and House,
According to Hofstede the influence of national culture is important to management for three reasons. The first is political and institutional. There are differences between the countries in formal institutions such as government, legal systems, educational systems, labour and employer’s association, and the way they are used. The secon...
These dimensions were developed after conducting a study at IBM. These four dimensions help to understand the behaviour at the workplace. Taking the example of Newzealand and China , the comparison can be made for Hofstede four dimensions(Eileen Crawley).Power distance is at 80 in China and 22 for Newzealand. In China, the society accepts inequality and believes that power is centred with top management, but in Newzealand, the hierarchies are just framed for convenience, there is an informal relationship among the managers and employees. Newzealand has a score of 79 and is known as an individualist culture; here people take care of themselves and self-sufficient in their work. China with a score of 20 is a collectivist country. People prefer to act according to the interest of group (family) and there is always biased behavioural due to this. Both China and Newzealand are masculine societies with a score of 58 and 68 respectively. Both these societies work towards their goal and for the success of the same. China has low uncertainty avoidance score of 30 and Newzealand has an intermediary score of 49.This reflects the importance of rules and regulations to controls risk in the society. Long or Short Term Orientation was another concept added to Hofstede’s study. Newzealand has a low score of 33, which implies that people are more focused on achieving quick results and save less for the future. China has a high score of 87, which implies that it is very pragmatic culture.("Greet-
Hofstede (1980) have developed the theory of Cultural Dimensions establishing five principal elements to measure the society culture clout on the values of its members. This influences the behaviours of the individuals inside the organization and often determines the group interaction and its outcome. Those five dimensions are, power distance (PDI), individualism/collectivism (IDV), uncertainty avoidance (UAI), masculinity/femininity (MAS), and long-term orientation (LTO). In th...
Country-by country differences are so prevalent of a world team scholar that have propose to create and validate a theory of relationship between culture and societal. (Mason Carpenter) The GLOBE project research had identified 9 dimensions of culture. A couple of the cultures for the business is Uncertainty Avoidance and Assertiveness. Avoidance is part of unpredictable evens and anxiety. You want to establish rules and laws in order to control the unexpected. Do managers need assertiveness? It is encouraged, managers may set up incentives that may boost their employee’s
Culture is the most important reason to influence an international company. Culture different can be nightmare to manager who do not know how to work with international employees (Passport to Trade, 2015). Three different management styles for manager to use in managing a team that are ‘Authoritarian style’, ‘Democratic style’ and ‘Laisses faire style’. In Hofstede’s study, he created five different dimensions that are ‘Power distance’, ‘Uncertainty avoidance’, ‘Individualism’, ‘Masculinity’ and ‘Confucian work dynamism’. Culture different and language become an important reason of conflicts while international people are working together (Mullins, 2010).
Geert Hofstede, a Dutch psychologist, was hired by the International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) in the 1960s and 1970s to examine the values and concerns of their employees around the world. While performing this task, Hofstede intentionally explored values related to individualism to understand and compare various cultures. By observing significant differences between cultures, Hofstede was able to formulate the cultural dimensions theory in an attempt to understand cultural trends between cultures, incorporate cultural contexts, and compare individual’s ways of thinking socially. Personally the attempt to quantify culture through various dimensions intrigues me, as I believe that it may be possible. However, I believe that Hofstadter’s current model lacks the proper controls necessary to account for the complex nature of culture.