Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Battle of little bighorn
Battle analysis little big horn
Battle of little bighorn
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Battle of little bighorn
A few United States Soldiers have attached to their names more controversy than Lieutenant Colonel George Armstrong Custer. An 1861 graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point, Custer became one of the Civil War’s generals at age 23 years old and received the nickname “Boy General.” His meteoric rise was based in no small degree upon his aggressiveness and reckless courage under fire.1 It was his reckless courage, however, that he was tragically defeated at the Battle of Little Bighorn, also commonly referred to as “Custer's Last Stand”. Custer failed to execute the operations process in which he failed to understand, visualize, describe, and direct his forces that ultimately resulted in his demise and cost the lives of …show more content…
The 7th Cavalry Regiment, led by Custer, advanced along the Little Bighorn pursuant to orders from Custer’s superior, Brigadier General Alfred H. Terry. Terry ordered Custer to pinpoint the location of the hostile Indians and wait for reinforcement before engaging in any battles. However, during a reconnaissance of the area, Custer’s scouts were spotted by a few Indians, which led him to believe that his position has been comprised. Custer believed he had lost his element of surprise, so he disobeyed Terry’s orders and rapidly devised and employed an assault on the Indians in hoping to still achieve his end state of capturing the Indians before they …show more content…
Custer’s faulty understanding of the environment, his preconceived notion of how his enemy would fight, his lack of certain critical information elements, as well as arrogance, and complacency led to poor decision-making and direction. Had he paid more attention to his scouts, he might not have divided his force to the point that no single element thereof could withstand the enemy onslaught. While the dispatch of Captain Benteen and his battalion to block the enemy’s avenue of escape was not itself unusual,17 dividing his forces to conduct the entrapment he had visualized and then ordering Reno’s element to attack was ill considered, if not foolhardy.18 Thus, Custer did not task organize his force in a way that it could be successful under the
The purpose of this paper is to perform a mission command analysis of the Battle of Gettysburg, honing in on Pickett’s Charge. The Battle of Gettysburg took place on July 1st through July 3rd in 1863 in the town of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. The belligerents were the Army of the Potomac, led by MG George G. Meade and the Army of Northern Virginia, led by GEN Robert E. Lee. The goal is to analyze the decisions of GEN Lee using the six mission command principles described in the Army Doctrine Publication 6-0 and then assess the outcome of those decisions.
Custer’s failure to exercise the operations process had strategic consequences. His initial understanding was incomplete and precipitated the chain of decisions that led to his defeat. He did not visualize a realistic approach, and failed to thoroughly describe his plan of attack to his subordinates. Finally, he was unable to effectively direct his forces during the battle due to poor communication and a complicated chain of command. Had he taken the time to develop a full understanding of the situation, Custer would have lost the opportunity for a decisive engagement but may have survived to fight in more favorable conditions. Instead of accepting prudent risk, he gambled his entire force and lost.
COL Prescott’s role in the Battle of Bunker Hill, or more correctly know as the Battle of Breed’s Hill, is a great example of how to properly execute mission command. An overview from The Cowpens Staff Ride and Battlefield Tour (Moncure) reveals a number of operation and strategic objectives that the American militia had to consider. In this instance, COL Prescott takes charge of 1200 men with instructions to defend against incoming British forces that were seeking to occupy the surrounding hills during the Siege of Boston campaign. COL Prescott utilized a variety of steps in the operations process that contributed to his expert utilization of mission command over his forces. Through various sources from published works by experts on the subject, COL Prescott’s mission command demonstrates its effectiveness in his understanding of the situation against the British, his visualization to create an end state for t...
It is far easier for us in the present than it was for those at Gettysburg, to look back and determine the path that the leaders should have taken. As students, studying battles such as this, we have the advantage of hindsight, knowing the outcome. Nonetheless, we can still learn valuable lessons from it. To do so, this analysis will explore some of the decisions of the leaders at Gettysburg, and how they were affected by the operational variables. This essay will scrutinize some of the leaders at Gettysburg, and the impact of their actions. The outcome of this analysis will show that what was true in 1863 is still true today. While many variables are vital to a successful army on the battlefield, none should be neglected. Each variable discussed in this examination will prove to be important, but the information battle will be paramount in the battle of Gettysburg.
LTC George Armstrong Custer did not effectively apply the concept of mission command as a warfighting function during the Battle of Little Bighorn. While it is important to understand the context in which Custer made his decisions, those circumstances offer little in terms of excusing the fiasco that was Little Bighorn. Custer failed to follow orders, did not take pertinent intelligence into consideration, did not adequately plan or execute protection of his forces, and fought without essential fires equipment available to him. Custer did exercise good sustainment, but it was for naught, as the battle was brief.
General Lee did not establish clear commander’s intent when issuing orders to his cavalry commander. After entering Pennsylvania, General Lee gave the cavalry commander wide latitude in his orders to screen the main column, and did not establish a clear intent. General Lee’s cavalry began a skirmish with the Union Army while traveling beyond their lines of communication. Outlined in ADRP 6-0 the commander must provide a clear and concise expression of the purpose of the operation1. General Lee’s cavalry was absent from the first days of the battle because he did not use clear and concise communication. General Lee’s poor use of mission command deprived him of his cavalry, an important asset.
Epple J. C. (1970). Custer’s battle of the Washita and A history of the Plains Indian Tribes
In 1858, warriors from the Spokane, Palouse, and Coeur d’Alene tribes routed an expeditionary force commanded by Colonel Edward Steptoe. The running battle resulted in seven soldiers dead, two soldiers missing, two howitzer cannons buried, the complete loss of the pack train, and three interpreters killed. Colonel Steptoe and his command escaped in the middle of the night nearly out of ammunition and in desperate condition. The mounted infantry known as Dragoons rode through the next day covering approximately seventy miles to the relative safety of the Snake River.
The Battle of Antietam could have been a devastating and fatal blow to the Confederate Army if Gen. McClellan acted decisively, took calculated risks, and veered away from his cautious approach to war. There are many instances leading up to the battle and during the battle in which he lacks the necessary offensive initiative to effectively cripple and ultimately win the war. This paper is intended to articulate the failure of Mission Command by GEN McClellan by pointing out how he failed to understand, visualize, describe and direct the battlefield to his benefit.
While Terry and Gibbon were meeting in Rosebud, Custer was already dividing his regiment into three separate battalions. Sergeant Windolph, from Reno’s battalion, recalls:
The Battle of Antietam on September 17th, 1862 was the single, most bloodiest day in American History, where more than 23,000 men became casualties of war. General George Brinton McClellan’s inability to use Mission Command, as a warfighting function was a key reason this battle did not end the American Civil War. An analysis of General McClellan’s Mission Command operational process will show how his personality, bias, and fear were detrimental to the outcome of the Battle of Antietam.
With buffalo numbers decreasing fast, Native American tribes faced starvation and desperation. There were many different actions the Americans did to destroy the land of the Native Americans. Western expansion caused a shift in the lives of Native Americans because many tribes, including women and kids, were being murdered by the new settlers. S.G. Colley, a U.S. Indian Agent, writes in a Report for the Committee on the Conduct of War, “That notwithstanding his knowledge of the facts as above set forth, he is informed that Colonel Chivington did, on the morning of the 29th of November last, surprise and attack said camp of friendly Indians and massacre a large number of them, (mostly women and children,) and did allow the troops of his command to mangle and mutilate them in the most horrible manner” (Colley, 1865). This quote shows the Americans were exterminating innocent American Indians for no justifiable reason.
Frederick Benteen, a three company force(140) commanded by Maj. Marcus Reno and a 5 company force (210) commanded by Custer.(10) Benteen was to march southwest to cut off any indians they found and “pitch into anything” he found and report to Custer. Reno was ordered to advance into the village from the south with the assurance from Custer that he would be supported by the regiment. Reno crossed the river about two miles south of the village and began advancing downstream toward the southern end.(11) the surprised warriors quickly rushed to fend off Reno’s assault. Reno halted and dismounted his troops to form a skirmish line which began firing at the advancing warriors. Mounted warriors pressed their attack against the skirmish line and endangered Reno’s left flank. Reno withdrew to a stand of Cottonwoods beside the river, for better protection. A second retreat was ordered to the bluffs east of the river. The warriors pursued the fleeing troops and killed many at close range. Reno’s shattered command recrossed the river and struggled up the steep bluffs to regroup atop high ground, to the east of the valley fight. In just 45 minutes Reno lost half of his command in dead , wounded and missing. Benteen having found no evidence of indians or their movement south, had returned to the main column, and met with Reno’s demoralized
This was the first time that diverse Native American tribes had united together to fight in such large numbers against a common, non-Indian enemy. Though fighting was intense and casualties for both sides totaled about one hundred dead, and 200 wounded, the US Army failed to recognize the skill and willingness-to-fight that the confederation of Indian Nations displayed (US history). Despite the Battle of Rosebud Creek, the Indians continued their Sun Dance Ceremonies. The night of June 24-25, the Sioux Warriors stayed up until after daylight the next morning, and were asleep in their teepees for most of the day when Custer led his troops into the Little Bighorn Valley (History
We begin this thrilling expedition with a few steps from the hero’s journey in Arkansas, post-civil war. Our Author lived in Arkansas also and he served in the Marine Corps during the Korean War, he also was a writer for The New Yorker. He may have a little bit of grit himself. Let’s start when a young teen sets out to kill the man who killed her father. She hires U.S Marshal Rooster Cogburn who has tough grit. [Mattie say’s] “Rooster was one of the last ones out… His hands were shaking and he was spilling tobacco” (Portis 58-59). This was her first encounter with the man who would eventually become her friend and savior. They are later joined by a Texas Ranger named La Beouf who helps them track down, Tom Chaney the